Channel
@alexgnews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,043subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001260496418 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alexgnews |
| Created | 7 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alexgnews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 1,043 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 1,041 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 1,040 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 1,040 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (27 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,951 |
| Reactions total | 135 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
135 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 30 | 22.2% | |
| 💯 | 20 | 14.8% | |
| 🤣 | 18 | 13.3% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 10.4% | |
| 💩 | 13 | 9.63% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 8.89% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 4.44% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 3.70% | |
| 🙈 | 5 | 3.70% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 3.70% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 2.22% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 1.48% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.741% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.741% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alexgnews. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
SWH, EHR, Дельфятник, Твнет и прочие буквально бьются в истерике. В кои-то веки они заметили и ксенофобию, и ущемление прав, и разрушительную нелогичность действий, но не правящей верхушки, а Нацобъединения. Моя чуйка подсказывает, что всё дело в кормушке, а не в правах человека. И это ровно тот момент, когда мне не слишком жалко уже сильно обмороженные уши. Сгорел сарай – гори и хата. @degikarayev
👍7
Благодарности пост. Вот два , прости Господи, блогера. "Мутный глаз", и собственно, "Паша Эмилевич"))) Ввиду невероятной компетентности, "Паша Эмилевич" возвел меня в ранг совладельца партии Суверена Вара. Поклон вам, Паша Эмилевич, за доверие и будущность))) Второй, который "Мутный глаз", присвоил мне звание офицера запаса, ну и заодно ждуна) Тут сложнее, ибо звание офицера нужно заслужить службой, а я увы.. Ну д…
😁4🙈2👍1🦄1
Сейчас появилось, а может и завелось, очень много блогеров, пищущих, снимающих, вещающих и т.д. И порой ты видишь их продукт, и начинаешь смеяться. Почему? Потому что непроверенная информация выданная в эфир не только обманывает читателя, но и позорит самого автора. Золотое правило журналистики, блогерства, публицистики - проверь сто раз из разных источников, напиши текст, и проверь еще сто раз перед публикацией. Д…
💯4👍2❤1
Один день неглобальной политики. Просто наблюдаем) Министр МВД закрывает единственный КПП с Беларусью. Во имя национальной безопасности. Езжайте, мол, через Литву. У Литвы нацбезопасность другая, поэтому там можно) Возбуждается Росликов(он, к слову, всегда возбуждается, по любому поводу, тем более когда безопасно) Мол верните всех на Родину, а то я вас харкаться заставлю(хорошо не пердеть) Суровый премьер собирает …
👍7
–"Патерниеки" не закроют, но у границы разместят силы НАТО– А в остальном - все сами)) Но в целом, прекрасный плевок в министра внутренних дел.
🤡4👍3
Мал клоп, да вонюч.. Вы знаете, сколько людей проголосовало на Национальное объединение? 84 939 человек. Или 9.2 процента 4 министра в правительстве. Цифры то скромные. А вреда на миллионы..
💩5💯3🍾1
#блогерскиевойны Помните бой Челубея и Пересвета? Не помните, конечно. Даже Плинер не помнит)) Но ведь историю то в школе учили? А историю харитоновских против пардаугавских?)) Тут не только Плинер, тут даже Урбанович помнит. Но врядли Никитин)) Так вот, друзья, наблюдая за всем безобразием, таки нахожу параллели) Нанятые, ненанятые, идейные и просто дурные, занимаются одним общим делом. Мочат друг друга. Не коалиц…
👍4
И Жог он их глаголом праведным) И мальчики, кровавые в глазах) Ну и конечно, все испугались, а может харкаться не захотели, и границу открыли. Росликов победил, как и обычно))))
🤣8🤡1
Radio SWH теперь протестует против законопроекта, обязывающего коммерческие станции отдавать не менее 30% эфира музыке, созданной в Латвии, и называет это ограничением редакционной свободы. Жаль, что я плохо запоминаю людей, встреченных на своём пути. Иногда это мешает вовремя поблагодарить. Иногда — вовремя припомнить. Когда-то какая-то диджейка с Radio SWH вполне отчётливо отказала мне в информационной поддержке …
🔥11👏4💯3👍2❤1
Глава KNAB подал в отставку; он покинет должность уже завтра. Официально - на пенсию. Но я отрою вам правду - он испугался возвращения Росликова😂
💯3
Не опаздывайте сегодня, Владыка долго ждать не будет))))
😁6🙈3💩1🫡1
"То тарелками пугають, дескать подлые летают, то у вас собаки лают, то у вас руины говорят" Чот меня все постоянно пугают. То Росликов угрожает вернуться, то мутный глаз стращает эфирами Шлессерса, то какой то косноязычный "Паша Эмилевич" требует отчитаться о моей недвижимости, вдруг тоже 40 у меня)) Вот сегодня выступил смелый Дан Титавс, например))) –В Латвии уже сейчас нужно готовиться к приезду Росликова – пол…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alexgnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 156,570 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПОЛИТabuser” (@alexgnews), 1,043 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alexgnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.