Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net -230. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,554–6,853 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 15:18
6,588
-23
13 Sept 2026, 02:20
6,611
-43
8 Sept 2026, 17:38
6,654
-31
3 Sept 2026, 09:52
6,685
-21
30 Aug 2026, 22:24
6,706
-10
27 Aug 2026, 23:03
6,716
-29
24 Aug 2026, 14:57
6,745
-16
20 Aug 2026, 18:14
6,761
-4
17 Aug 2026, 20:44
6,765
-19
14 Aug 2026, 15:36
6,784
-23
11 Aug 2026, 00:42
6,807
-9
8 Aug 2026, 10:12
6,816
-2
7 Aug 2026, 14:31
6,818
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:26
6,818
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 31 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5s
Average length
3s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,754 reactions across 22 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,376
50.0%
❤
602
21.9%
💯
157
5.70%
🎉
151
5.48%
🤩
114
4.14%
⚡
102
3.70%
🐳
72
2.61%
🏆
60
2.18%
😍
22
0.799%
🍓
18
0.654%
😈
18
0.654%
💘
15
0.545%
🤯
14
0.508%
🥰
10
0.363%
🍾
9
0.327%
❤🔥
5
0.182%
💔
4
0.145%
😘
3
0.109%
💋
2
0.073%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,754 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
115
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 22 we hold a reading for · 36%
Most on one post
70
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alexandrovartem. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 March 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Знаете, кому хочется платить деньги? Вот прям всегда…
Людям, которые увлеченные своим делом ❤️
Им хочется дать деньги, в них инвестировать, им хочется помогать и всячески поддерживать
А знаете почему?)
Ощущение. Как будто они знают что-то, чего не знаешь ты. Как будто они очень уверены в том, что делают. Как будто знают, что всё будет так, как они хотят.
А что если секрет больших денег — это решить, что ты ох*ен…
Что ОНА творит? Заработала $7 000 000 на простых Reels и набрала 400к подписчиков
— видео-расследование
Эта девушка превратила кризис среднего возраста в идею блога, который принес ей миллионы 💰
Я изучил каждый шаг от 0 до $7 млн — вот 6 приёмов контента, которые помогли ей превратить внимание в деньги ⭣
>>> смотрите здесь
Вы узнаете так же как украсть её стратегию для Telegram-блога, даже если вы интроверт и не …
Я встретил девушку, которая взорвала мой мозг 🤯 и заставила тайно следить за ней
короче, ей 30+ лет, она проживала карьерный кризис, не знала кем быть и где работать
от безысходности, девушка заводит новый блог в соц сетях, чтобы делиться своим жизненным путём…
спустя 7 месяцев она бесплатно (!) набрала 400 тыс подписчиков и сделала запуск на 7 млн$
я в ахуе…
я изучил весь её контент,
воронку и запуск
смотрите в…
Как я сделал 1 324 290 рублей за 28 дней через переписки в Telegram
— полная схема новой воронки
РАЗОБЛАЧАЮ популярный миф:
«с низким чеком невозможно стать миллионером» 😠
Ха-ха-ха
Я через переписки и одну статью продал на 1.3 млн курс по маркетингу с чеком 20-30 тыс БЕЗ личных созвонов, вебинаров и рекламы
В этом видео вы увидите:
▪ как я собрал 300 чел в воронку и продал на миллион + 💵 с помощью статьи и диало…
Никогда бы не подумал, что 1.000.000₽ / мес дохода начнется с тупой покупки на Ozon
серия 16 из 100
серия 15 тут ⭠
Напомню, что я 1 месяц назад бросил себе вызов — заработать 1 млн за 28 дней на мини-курсе
Причём сделать это на среднем чеке 20-30 тыс БЕЗ продающих созвонов, вебинаров, вложений в рекламу…
28 апреля
я показал кассу 0 рублей
⭢ вот здесь
29 мая у меня 1.040.000₽ в кассе
⭣ пруфы в комментах ⭣
Я весь…
МЕНЯ ЗАСЫПАЛО ДЕНЬГАМИ (опять)
Традиционная рубрика каждый месяц в моем блоге 😅
20 мая я запустил новую воронку
— на 1 день выложил статью
— 100 чел прочитало статью
— за 1 день раскупили продукт
— уведомления трещат об оплатах
Касса близится к миллиону
Скоро напишу разбор запуска,
а пока что тыкни реакцию 🔥
чтобы твой Телеграм канал
тоже засыпал тебя деньгами
Рано или поздно ты понимаешь, что успех в жизни сводится к твоей способности придерживаться плана, несмотря на любые эмоции, кризисы или тревогу, которые ты можешь испытывать
Бл*ть, вот заходишь в соц сети, все такие CEO, founder, продюсер на миллионы. Ну хоть бы один честно написал: «Я ИП / самозанятый, ебашу один в поле, у меня блог на соплях, ООО «Помогите, я заебался»
😂😂😂
Кстати, для вас как раз сегодня начинаю показывать реалити 👈
0₽ ⭢ 28 дней ⭢ 1 млн ₽
Как любому спецу запустить онлайн-продукт с прибылью в миллион без контента в блоге 24/7
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @alexandrovartem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Егор Пыриков @egorpyrikov · 43,688 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Артём Алекс” (@alexandrovartem), 6,588 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alexandrovartem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.