Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🅰️🅻🅴🆇 🅸🅽🆂🅸🅳🅴🆁

Channel

🅰️🅻🅴🆇 🅸🅽🆂🅸🅳🅴🆁

@alex_bookmaker

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

3,472subscribers

+95 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001740966261
TypeChannel
Username@alex_bookmaker
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/alex_bookmaker

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,3673,5253,4467 August 2026 — 3,377 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,377 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,374 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,376 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,373 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,370 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,367 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,432 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,525 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,516 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,512 subscribers12 September 2026 — 3,500 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,472 subscribers3,4727 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net +95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,343–3,549 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 19:213,472-28
12 Sept 2026, 00:383,500-12
7 Sept 2026, 09:193,512-4
3 Sept 2026, 01:063,516-9
30 Aug 2026, 18:473,525+93
28 Aug 2026, 05:133,432+65
24 Aug 2026, 23:433,367-3
21 Aug 2026, 09:493,370-3
15 Aug 2026, 00:583,373-3
11 Aug 2026, 17:563,376+2
8 Aug 2026, 08:463,374-3
7 Aug 2026, 17:323,377no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:303,377first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

371 reactions across 21 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍19352.0%
🔥9024.3%
🤝6818.3%
195.12%
🏆10.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 371 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC283 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Тотал 22.5Б за 1.87 Начало в 02.00 Мск.

👍7🔥3🤝2

7 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC152 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

👑👑👑👑 5️⃣ СТАВОК ПО ЛИНИИ НА ТОП-ТЕННИС УЖЕ ГОТОВЫ НА ЗАВТРАШНИЙ ИГРОВОЙ ДЕНЬ. Продолжаем заигрывать топовые Мастерсы в Монреале и Торонто. 👉Вечерние/ночные матчи. Стартуем через пару часов. -Полный игровой день (5 ставок по линии) - 5000руб. -Стандартный игровой день (3 ставки по линии) - 3000руб. 🚀Коэффициенты- 1.70+ Матчи ТОП.Есть во всех БК. Начинаю рассылку. 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 @IamAlexander1

👍2🔥2🤝2

7 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC472 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 ❌Хуркач + Йович за 2.10 Заиграем такой двойник на сегодня. Хуркач в двух сетах прошел непростого Табило и по идее с Ботиком ему не должно быть сильно сложнее. В этом плане победа над Медведевым не говорит о том, что голландец сейчас находится в каком-то диком прайме. Что касается второго матча, то очень понравилась игра Корнеевой против Наварро, с такой игрой она могла пройти еще многих из тех, кто осталс

👍11🔥5🤝31

6 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC599 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 ❌Тотал 21.5Б за 1.70 Вчера Ходар мягко говоря не впечатлил. Возможно сказывается усталость, он играет уже второй турнир подряд вообще без отдыха. Музетти же после возвращения выглядел лучше, чем ожидалось и перед этим мастерсом у него было время на отдых и подготовку. Думаю борьбу как минимум должен навязывать испанцу.

👍12🔥3🤝31

6 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC579 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👑👑👑👑 Впервые за долгое время закрыли игровой день в минус. Очень близко не доехали два тотала, Меншик вообще вел с брейком во втором сете и умудрился его проиграть. Это рабочий момент, такое случается, сегодня будем исправлять ситуацию. 📊📊📊📊📊📊📊 Вип за вчера: ✅Потапова за 1.85 ✅Дардери за 2.12 ✅Ханфман за 2.10 ✅Ван де Зандсхулп за 1.73 🟡Блокс за 1.75 -возврат Вип за сегодня: ❌Йович-Линет 20.5М за 1.80 ❌Фернли-Меншик

👍74🤝3

5 Aug 2026, 20:54 UTC560 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✅✅✅✅✅✅✅ ✅Хуркач за 1.85 Сюда второй в ряд за сегодня.

👍13🤝4🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC570 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✅✅✅✅✅✅✅ ✅Коэффициент 1.93 Прочитано.

👍8🔥3🤝3

5 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC552 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 ✅Риндеркнеш 2 сет за 1.93

👍10🤝32🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC611 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 ✅Хуркач -1.5 за 1.85 На Уимблдоне Хуркач казалось наконец нашел свою игру, уверенно разбираясь со своими оппонентами, но помешала травма. Поляк смог быстро восстановиться и в первом круге обыграл непростого Джирона. На очереди Табило, который хорошо сыграл в Вашингтоне, но которому очевидно не хватает стабильности и сможет ли он третью неделю подряд держать такой уровень- вопрос открытый. Да и стиль Хурка

👍11🤝4🔥31

5 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC626 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🍎🌹🍎🍎🌹🍎 🍎🌹🍎🍎🍎🍎 Закрыли игровой день вип в очередной жирный плюс. Могло быть 5 в ряд но по Блоксу возврат из-за отмены матча. Двигаемся дальше. 📊📊📊📊📊📊📊 ✅Потапова за 1.85 ✅Дардери за 2.12 ✅Ханфман за 2.10 ✅Ван де Зандсхулп за 1.73 🟡Блокс за 1.75 -возврат

👍4🔥2🤝21

5 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC598 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✅✅✅✅✅✅✅ ✅Гибсон за 1.75 Конкурентным был только первый сет, потом все встало на свои места.

👍9🔥42🤝1

4 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC644 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 ❌Победа 🇮🇹Сонего за 1.90 Старт матча не ранее 21.00 Мск.

👍9🔥2🤝2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @alex_bookmaker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@alex_bookmaker edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
7 August 2026
Most recent edit
7 August 2026

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🅰️🅻🅴🆇 🅸🅽🆂🅸🅳🅴🆁” (@alex_bookmaker), 3,472 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alex_bookmaker.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.