3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 434–437 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 04:07
437
+3
8 Aug 2026, 05:17
434
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:11
434
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.9%
avg views ÷ 437 subscribers
Avg views / post
82.4
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
26.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
7 (4 August 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
577
Reactions total
155
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 12s
Average length
1m 02s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
155 reactions across 7 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
38
24.5%
❤
23
14.8%
🤩
15
9.68%
👍
14
9.03%
👏
13
8.39%
custom 5449697900961499441
12
7.74%
custom 5449907619919597587
12
7.74%
💘
11
7.10%
custom 5449484342302641976
6
3.87%
custom 5449696517982030716
5
3.23%
🎉
4
2.58%
custom 5449741104037527350
2
1.29%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Дизайнерская джинсовка - это некая палочка выручалочка в прохладный день , когда нужно что-то накинуть , но при этом выглядеть стильно и собирать комплименты 😚
Джинс с прозрачной пайеткой и яркие акценты на вороте , фурнитуре 💘
Невероятно роскошный сарафан создали из струящейся ткани под джинс с благородным отблеском и вышивкой ♥️ дополнили декор вязанным кружевом , чем добавили воздуха и более светлого тона 😍
Восхитительно можно выглядеть всегда и это даже не вопрос уместности , а больше про разрешение себе проявляться 💛 и тут из солнцем наполненного состояния родился костюм из сочетания трикотажа и кружева ☀️
Брюки внизу затягиваются , как Аладины на кулиску , но есть возможность их распускать и носить по классике 🤗
Крутой и даже несколько круизный получился образ из разного сочетания трикотажей ♥️
Верх исполнен единым полотном и акцент на спину , а юбка со стройнящими и вытягивающими силуэт клиньями 🪸
Вчера случился новый для меня и такой вдохновляющий опыт варения свечей с намерением в формате подкаста 💓
Крутая идея , крутая команда , желаю только успехов 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
https://t.me/o_aroma 💕
Приехала Людмила и поделилась не только красотой , которую она создает , но и своими новыми навыками и впечатления от обучения сборки цветов по японской технологии 💓
А потом показала какую красоту создала на заказ и это волшебно , делюсь с вами 💕
@kirilina_lyudmila
И еще один способ стилизации бахромы - на пояс , вторым слоем , добавляя к более простым образам 🤗
Черный итальянский трикотаж , бахрома с золотистым рюлексом и кружево цветы в тон 💕
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @alevtinaproject. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дом Моды Алевтины Коноплиной” (@alevtinaproject), 437 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alevtinaproject.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.