Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -932. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,767–42,065 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 14:37
40,917
-20
16 Sept 2026, 08:36
40,937
-59
14 Sept 2026, 13:41
40,996
-32
13 Sept 2026, 02:40
41,028
-81
11 Sept 2026, 06:21
41,109
-84
8 Sept 2026, 06:41
41,193
-68
5 Sept 2026, 01:01
41,261
-24
3 Sept 2026, 06:57
41,285
-33
2 Sept 2026, 00:34
41,318
-14
1 Sept 2026, 00:07
41,332
-11
31 Aug 2026, 00:17
41,343
-37
30 Aug 2026, 00:38
41,380
-26
29 Aug 2026, 02:35
41,406
-37
28 Aug 2026, 01:48
41,443
-33
26 Aug 2026, 23:18
41,476
-27
25 Aug 2026, 22:23
41,503
-24
24 Aug 2026, 18:56
41,527
-60
23 Aug 2026, 03:46
41,587
-79
21 Aug 2026, 14:48
41,666
+42
20 Aug 2026, 13:46
41,624
first reading
Engagement
213 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.98%
avg views ÷ 40,917 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,450
113 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
116
of 213 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 112 of 113 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
213 (1 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
276,287
Reactions total
10,909
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 23:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,810
Videos
≈359
Links
≈1,010
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
7m 04s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
20,780 reactions across 207 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
11,635
56.0%
🔥
5,825
28.0%
👍
893
4.30%
🙏
662
3.19%
🎉
318
1.53%
❤🔥
209
1.01%
🤔
202
0.972%
⚡
199
0.958%
🕊
164
0.789%
💯
142
0.683%
😍
139
0.669%
🥰
115
0.553%
👏
106
0.51%
🤝
61
0.294%
✍
49
0.236%
👌
40
0.192%
🫡
6
0.029%
🆒
5
0.024%
💋
2
0.01%
💘
2
0.01%
3 further kinds
6
0.029%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 207 of the 213 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,780 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 213 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
170
across the posts below
Posts paid on
29
of 209 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alekseykapustin_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 213 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔵РАСШИРЕННЫЙ РАЗБОР — ПОЛНАЯ КАРТИНА ВАШЕЙ МАТРИЦЫ
Не всегда достаточно посмотреть только на дату рождения. В расширенном разборе мы соединяем дату рождения, имя, отчество и фамилию, чтобы рассмотреть человека с разных сторон и собрать всё в одну систему.
🔎 ЧТО РАЗБИРАЕМ?
✅ Сознание и характер — особенности мышления, поведения и текущего жизненного этапа.
✅ Предназначение и реализация — миссия, таланты и направлен…
🔵 ПРЕМИУМ-РАЗБОР — ГЛУБОКИЙ АНАЛИЗ ВАШЕЙ МАТРИЦЫ
Когда дело касается денег, отношений, реализации и важных решений, мы не всегда понимаем, почему действуем именно так. Премиум-разбор помогает увидеть вашу систему целиком — через матрицу, характер, потенциал и текущий период жизни.
🔎 ЧТО РАЗБИРАЕМ?
✅ Личность и характер — особенности мышления, поведения, принятия решений и взаимодействия с окружающими.
✅ Таланты и …
❤️ КСТАТИ, ХОЧУ ОБЪЯСНИТЬ ОДИН МОМЕНТ.
В последнее время мне приходит достаточно много сообщений с вопросами о разборах: чем они отличаются, что именно я смотрю, какие вопросы можно задать и какой формат подойдёт конкретному человеку.
❤️Поэтому в ближайшие дни хочу спокойно разобрать эту тему здесь, в канале.
Покажу, что именно находится внутри разных форматов и для каких задач они могут быть полезны ❤️❤️❤️
✔️ ПОЧЕМУ ОДНОМУ ЧЕЛОВЕКУ НУЖНО ДЕЙСТВОВАТЬ, А ДРУГОМУ — СНАЧАЛА ОСТАНОВИТЬСЯ?
Я не воспринимаю цифры как инструкцию: «У тебя такое число — значит, делай только так».
Мне интереснее увидеть закономерность человека.
Например, Число Ума 💋 часто связано с инициативой и стремлением действовать самостоятельно. Такому человеку проще начать, чем долго ждать подходящего момента.
А при Числе Ума 💋 человек может больше ана…
❤️ НОВЫЙ ДЕНЬ. И ТЕМА, КОТОРАЯ МОЖЕТ БЫТЬ ОСОБЕННО АКТУАЛЬНА ДЛЯ ТЕХ, КТО ПРИВЫК ВСЕГДА ДВИГАТЬСЯ ВПЕРЁД.
Чем сильнее человек хочет изменить жизнь, тем чаще он пытается делать ещё больше.
❤️Больше работать.
❤️Больше планировать.
❤️Больше контролировать.
А когда результата нет, кажется, что нужно ещё сильнее себя разогнать.
Но что, если иногда нужно сделать обратное?
❤️Остановиться❤️
❤️Я часто вижу, как человек п…
↗️ КАКИЕ МУЖЧИНЫ НЕ СОЗДАНЫ ДЛЯ ОТНОШЕНИЙ?
После двух предыдущих постов хочу предложить вам посмотреть на эту тему ещё глубже.
Я выпустил новый ролик, где разбираю, почему женщин может так сильно притягивать определённый тип мужчин и что в этом может показывать дата рождения.
❤️Почему нас тянет к «плохим парням»? Почему с одним мужчиной возникает спокойствие, а с другим — ревность, конфликты и постоянное эмоционал…
А ЕСЛИ ВАШ ПАРТНЁР ПОКАЗЫВАЕТ ВАМ ВАС САМИХ?
Есть ещё одна интересная закономерность — кармические зеркала.
❤️ В цифровой психологии при анализе двух людей мы можем смотреть на то, как складываются их числа и какие энергии возникают именно в соединении пары.
Иногда человек буквально подсвечивает то, что мы сами в себе не замечаем. Он может усиливать нашу уверенность. Может провоцировать наши слабые стороны. А може…
💋ПОЧЕМУ НАС ТЯНЕТ К ТЕМ, КОГО МЫ САМИ НЕ МОЖЕМ ОБЪЯСНИТЬ?
Бывало такое: головой вы понимаете, что мужчина вам совершенно не подходит, но почему-то продолжаете к нему тянуться?
В цифровой психологии есть интересное понятие — закон «нумерологического дефицита».
Если определённых энергий человеку не хватает в собственной матрице, он может особенно сильно реагировать на людей, которые этими качествами обладают.
❤️ На…
Доброе утро!🕊️
Сегодня хочу поговорить об отношениях и о двух интересных закономерностях, которые часто остаются за пределами обычного анализа совместимости.
Давайте начнём❤️
🔐 Хотите пойти глубже?
Только что мы посмотрели, как самостоятельно рассчитать свой личный год.
Но цифра — это только начало. Самое интересное начинается тогда, когда понимаешь, как её читать и как она связана с другими сферами жизни.
❗Именно для этого мы создали закрытый канал KeySTo/Lives.
Здесь я делюсь эксклюзивной информацией, наблюдениями и материалами KeyTo, которых нет в открытом канале.
А ещё в канале вы…
А хотите сами посмотреть, какой у вас сейчас личный год?
Считается он довольно просто.
*️⃣Берём день рождения + месяц рождения + цифры текущего года и складываем всё до одной цифры.
Например, дата рождения — 14.08, а год — 2026:
1 + 4 + 8 + 2 + 0 + 2 + 6 = 23
2 + 3 = 5
Ваш личный год — 5.
Но самое интересное начинается дальше — что означает это число именно для вас?
🛤️ В моей системе KeyTo есть отдельный разбор…
❤35👍10❤🔥2🤝2
Showing the 12 most recent of 213 posts we hold for @alekseykapustin_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@alekseykapustin_official edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
7 September 2026
Most recent edit
7 September 2026
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Можно ли навсегда избавиться от зависимости только силой воли?
❌ Нет, пока не поймешь, какую дыру в уме ты этим затыкаешь47%
✅ Да, главное — дисциплина и жесткий контроль34%
🌀 Это карма, пока не проживешь — не отпустит8%
⚡️ Зависимость можно только экологично подменить на другую привычку14%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 213 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алексей Капустин | Психология цифр” (@alekseykapustin_official), 40,917 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alekseykapustin_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.