Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Александра Сашина / Здоровье под 🔎

Channel

Александра Сашина / Здоровье под 🔎

@aleksandrasashina

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,117subscribers

+53 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001669096154
TypeChannel
Username@aleksandrasashina
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/aleksandrasashina

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0551,1181,086.57 August 2026 — 1,064 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,064 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,061 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,062 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,064 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,063 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,060 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,059 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,058 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,055 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,066 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,100 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,118 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,117 subscribers1,1177 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net +53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,046–1,127 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 10:211,117-1
15 Sept 2026, 08:221,118+18
11 Sept 2026, 13:171,100+34
7 Sept 2026, 01:171,066+11
2 Sept 2026, 05:571,055-3
30 Aug 2026, 15:261,058-1
27 Aug 2026, 13:461,059-1
24 Aug 2026, 09:261,060-3
20 Aug 2026, 11:221,063-1
17 Aug 2026, 09:371,064+2
13 Aug 2026, 15:351,062+1
10 Aug 2026, 15:061,061-3
7 Aug 2026, 08:001,064no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:551,064first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC34 viewsread 7 August 2026

Но кожа — это всего лишь «витрина», воздействия глутатиона, а главный мэджик происходит во внутренних органах 👌 Без глутатиона мы бы умерли в течение нескольких часов, потому что это главный страж нашей биохимии. 1. Печень — это орган №1, где глутатион работает в режиме нон-стоп. Он связывает и выводит тяжелые металлы (ртуть, свинец, кадмий), остатки алкоголя и продукты распада лекарств (включая парацетамол). Если

Signed Александра Сашина Клинический психолог

5 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC36 viewsread 7 August 2026

В последние годы стало очень модно колоть капельницы. По вене пускают все, от железа, до омолаживающих составов. Одна из самых популярных капельниц - «Золушка», мгновенный эффект сияющей кожи, неоспоримая польза ингредиентов, входящих в состав (глутатион+витамин С, иногда еще + тиоктовая кислота), и кусачая цена (от 5 тыр за сеанс, а рекомендуют обычно 5-10 сеансов) Но мало кто знает, что в разу круче капельниц раб

Signed Александра Сашина Клинический психолог

5 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC34 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed Александра Сашина Клинический психолог

5 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC33 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed Александра Сашина Клинический психолог

5 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC32 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed Александра Сашина Клинический психолог

5 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC32 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed Александра Сашина Клинический психолог

4 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC43 viewsread 7 August 2026

⬆️ А это буквально через несколько месяцев, самый свежий мой анализ, тут другие единицы измерения (оптимум до 5,69), и, как видите, здесь все хорошо. Никаких статинов и инъекций не применяла, все воздействие только через питание. Так что, говоря о холестерине, я не голословна, о влиянии питания на него знаю не понаслышке, все мои утверждения основаны на обучениях + собственном опыте + опыте работы с клиентами.

Signed Александра Сашина Клинический психолог

4 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC42 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Александра Сашина Клинический психолог

4 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC40 viewsread 7 August 2026

⬆️ Вот такой холестерин бывает, если я перестаю следить за питанием (оптимум до 180, но в моем случае лучше еще немного ниже)

Signed Александра Сашина Клинический психолог

4 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC41 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Александра Сашина Клинический психолог

4 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC39 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed Александра Сашина Клинический психолог

4 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC42 viewsread 7 August 2026

Побочные эффекты статинов: (все упомянутые побочные эффекты — реальные, зафиксированные риски) 🧬 Блокировка CoQ10 и проблемы с энергией Статины блокируют синтез мевалоната — предшественника не только холестерина, но и коэнзима Q10 (убихинона). · Механизм: Дефицит CoQ10 нарушает работу митохондрий (энергетических станций клеток). · Последствия: Это напрямую связано с мышечной болью, слабостью и снижением вынослив

Signed Александра Сашина Клинический психолог

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @aleksandrasashina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Закрытый клуб 🔑«Капитал на недвижимости»
@zarabotok_na_nedvishke · 26,075
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
Про недвижимость
@azbukafinance · 69,368
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Александра Сашина / Здоровье под 🔎” (@aleksandrasashina), 1,117 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aleksandrasashina.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.