ну и чего вы это самое... все бесшовное, но панели прям пришлось доставать из гпт, с татами вышло сильно проще
🥰6👍2

Channel
@aleinikovaaaaa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
1,657subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001594602134 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aleinikovaaaaa |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aleinikovaaaaa |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 1,657 | +2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 1,655 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 1,657 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 1,656 | +4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 1,652 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 1,651 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 1,648 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 1,647 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 1,645 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 1,645 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
268 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 92 | 34.3% | |
| 🥰 | 74 | 27.6% | |
| 💯 | 22 | 8.21% | |
| ❤🔥 | 20 | 7.46% | |
| custom 5465657174799697922 | 15 | 5.60% | |
| 😱 | 15 | 5.60% | |
| custom 5434120196312803888 | 8 | 2.99% | |
| custom 5402078408844789794 | 7 | 2.61% | |
| custom 5235451050902693482 | 6 | 2.24% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 1.87% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 1.12% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.373% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 268 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ну и чего вы это самое... все бесшовное, но панели прям пришлось доставать из гпт, с татами вышло сильно проще
🥰6👍2
продолжается работа с уникальными текстурами для уникальных материалов норм гпт выдает? презентация PBR (чуть не написала RPG))) прежде чем генерировать отдельные картинки... тратит мои токены, но такой молодчинка
🔥18
вот это новостиииииииии
😱15❤🔥7
сейчас бы сделать уникальный материал на базе своего многолетнего опыта, чтобы поместить его в грядущую библиотеку т к а н и 🐶🐶🐶 анонс 🐶🐶🐶 гпт невероятный инструмент, всегда очень помогает. Промты до абсурда примитивные в комментах оставлю файлы, чтобы вы тоже могли попробовать сделать татами 👀 #полезное@aleinikovaaaaa
🔥14
Каков диагноз? 🙂 это высокий валирийский, нишевое хобби😄
custom 546565717479969792215🤩1
А это я сохраняла подтверждение своим умозаключениям о том, как сменяется приоритет визуала над качеством Идея всегда была важна. Однако мы живем в чем-то новом. Нейросети сильно замылили глаз потребителя: их несовершенство, нейромусор, посткор дорисовка ,— многое стало простительно, даже третья рука, если это красиво Пример, какого уровня 3д зарисовки могут иметь большой отклик, исходя из мысли выше. Еще нескольк…
custom 52354510509026934826💯1
Чем я еще занимаюсь, пока не могу заниматься чем-то полезным)) спустя годы использования зарубежной карты итальянской подруги, пришло время встать на ноги и найти, не зависящий ни от кого кроме меня, способ оплаты своих любимых нейронок)) я пробовала пополнять баланс через посредников на авито, через подругу, через ОЗОН банк, но тут мне кажется я нашла самый удобный для себя способ. Буквально сегодня мне понадобил…
🥰5
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥9
Video message, posted without a caption
🥰10
У меня (и возможно у вас) ломался впн. Чуть больше суток без цивилизации 😃 Первый раз такая поломка, я немного была шокирована, Андрей все это время пытается починить интернет, и уже есть некоторые продвижения в этом вопросе (поэтому я здесь)) Но я сейчас тут не об этом)) Попался недавно красивый рендер в запрещенной, я зашла глянуть кто автор. Потом зашла к автору, а там информация «мама-визер» и по этой теме лял…
💯21🔥7👍3
Мои розовые будни
🥰53custom 54341201963128038888custom 54020784088447897947
Еще немного ночной пользы странно себе представить что когда-то это было мое обычное время бодрствования, но сейчас делюсь полезностью и спать о работе с Австралией ничем делиться нельзя, строгий НДА. Однако неоценимую полезность принесло мне это сотрудничество, а именно способ получения оплаты из-за рубежа. Сервис надежный, нужно будет пройти некую аутентификацию: - зарегаться - подтвердить личность документом - п…
❤🔥13
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @aleinikovaaaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
в каком максе работаете?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“aleinikovaaa” (@aleinikovaaaaa), 1,657 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aleinikovaaaaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.