Video message, posted without a caption
❤6🥰1

Channel
@albertlaw
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,927subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001344599740 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @albertlaw |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/albertlaw |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 1,927 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 1,930 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 1,934 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 1,937 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (6 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,361 |
| Reactions total | 484 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
656 reactions across 14 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 208 | 31.7% | |
| 🔥 | 123 | 18.8% | |
| 👍 | 79 | 12.0% | |
| 👏 | 49 | 7.47% | |
| 🙏 | 48 | 7.32% | |
| 🥰 | 41 | 6.25% | |
| 💯 | 40 | 6.10% | |
| ❤🔥 | 15 | 2.29% | |
| 🏆 | 12 | 1.83% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 1.22% | |
| 😍 | 6 | 0.915% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 0.61% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 0.61% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.457% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.457% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.457% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.305% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.152% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.152% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.152% | |
| 5 further kinds | 5 | 0.762% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 656reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @albertlaw. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Video message, posted without a caption
❤6🥰1
Сегодня, наверное, был один из самых эмоциональных и тяжелых дней за последнее время. Рано утром мы выехали в СИЗО в Можайске. Несмотря на то, что я приехал еще до открытия, в списке оказался лишь пятым. Проблема в том, что в этом СИЗО всего 3 следственных кабинета. Первая тройка зашла, и пока они не закончили, никого больше не пускали. По стечению обстоятельств они завершили очень поздно. У меня было ограничено вре…
💯15🙏9🕊3🤯3❤2⚡1❤🔥1🤝1
Про маленьких людей Наверное, это одна из моих самых нелюбимых категорий людей. Те, кто занимают должности начального звена, от которых зависит принятие небольших решений, но при этом они могут напрямую влиять на судьбы людей. Например, секретари судебного заседания. Я сталкиваюсь с ними каждый день по роду работы. И в большинстве своем это очень приятные люди, особенно когда и ты проявляешь к ним понимание, уважени…
💯25🔥4🥰3❤2👍2💘1🫡1😇1
Дело Нейланда Расстрел в 15 лет Друзья, у меня для вас новость. Я запускаю рубрику, которая будет выходить раз в неделю, где буду разбирать громкие уголовные дела минувших лет. Поддержите этот пост реакциями, если такое интересно. Мне важно понимать, откликается ли вам такое. Дело Аркадия Нейланда уникальный и во многом парадоксальный случай в советской судебной практике. 27 января 1964 года, в день 20-летия осво…
🔥37👍16❤🔥7❤5🥰2🙏2💋1💘1
Вчера днем ко мне по рекомендации обратились за помощью. Я согласился, сразу принял защиту, и уже через час был в отделе полиции, где мой подзащитный сидел с утра. Дальше весь цикл следственных действий, допрос в качестве свидетеля, предъявление обвинения, допрос уже как подозреваемого, очная ставка с потерпевшим. Все это за один день. Статья тяжкая, мошенничество. По итогу, задержание по ст. 91 УПК, и ночь парень …
👏24❤13🔥10🏆3👍2🤩2🥰2
Делай что должно, и будь что будет Последние несколько дней у меня ушли на учебу, но в разном смысле этого слова. В выходные мы плотно разбирали нормы права, кассационную практику, судебные акты. Классическая учеба, в прямом свисла этого слова. Вчера тоже была учеба, но уже другая. Коллега Александр Караваев провдит «Лучше спросите мэтра». Туда приглашают адвокатов, которые давно уже находятся на совсем другой выс…
❤15👍9🔥4🤩1🥰1
Дорогу осилит идущий Как провести выходной, когда их и так немного? Вариантов конечно много, но последнее, что приходит в голову, это 09 утра поехать на очное обучение. Я поехал. И это, наверное, характеризует тех, кто поступил также, сильнее любых слов. Скажу честно, что совсем не пожалел. Утро началось с выступления Нвера Гаспаряна. Он осветил две темы: новые возможности заявления ходатайства об исключении доказ…
👍18❤14🥰5🔥2
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥16❤6❤🔥6👍3🥰2🤩1
Сегодняшний день полностью прошел в офисе, хотя начинался с выезда. С утра поехал в СИЗО-2 Бутырка, но, оценив очередь, понял, что сегодня туда не пробиться. Вернулся в офис, и с головой ушел в составление документов. Итого: Составил и направил жалобы в Можайскую городскую прокуратуру, ГУ ФСИН по Московской области и в само ФКУ СИЗО-10, все по условиям содержания моего подзащитного. Нельзя оставлять нарушения без вн…
❤28👍5🔥5👏1💔1🥰1😍1
Мой день сегодня начался в 4:30 утра. Проснулся в это время, хотя уснул только в час ночи, потому что смотрел финал чемпионата мира по футболу, искренне болел за Аргентину. Но Испанцы объективно были сильнее, показали очень красивую и качественную игру. Аргентина проиграла по делу. Но я все равно расстроился. Очень люблю эту игру за эмоции, за страсть, за характер. Зачем так рано вставать? Мое лучшее время для работ…
🙏33❤17👍9🏆7😢3👏1💔1🥰1
Video message, posted without a caption
🥰17🔥16❤11👍6❤🔥1💘1🤩1🥴1
Где заканчиваются оправдания и начинаются причины Вчера почти весь день провел у следователя на допросе своего подзащитного. Это был второй допрос. Мы в основном разбирали характеристики его личности , биографию, круг общения, отношения в коллективе. Слушая, как он рассказывал о детстве, школе, друзьях, я невольно вспомнил свою студенческую любовь к криминологии. Этот предмет не перестает волновать меня и сейчас, ос…
❤24🔥8👍6🥰2👏1💘1🤩1😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @albertlaw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 619,459 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Адвокат Альберт Халеян” (@albertlaw), 1,927 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/albertlaw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.