Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Тревожные кассеты

Channel

Тревожные кассеты

@alarm_cassettes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,590subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001325380955
TypeChannel
Username@alarm_cassettes
Created3 March 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alarm_cassettes

Growth

1,5901,5941,5926 August 2026 — 1,593 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,593 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,594 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,592 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,590 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,589–1,595 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 08:481,590-2
12 Aug 2026, 22:141,592-2
9 Aug 2026, 14:161,594+1
6 Aug 2026, 09:031,593no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:571,593first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.9%
avg views ÷ 1,590 subscribers
Avg views / post
698
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held15 (4 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total3,489
Reactions total144
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

507 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥31762.5%
🙏7314.4%
👻5611.0%
👾254.93%
custom 5192784828604385744142.76%
🌚101.97%
custom 539560758105187929661.18%
🤬61.18%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 507reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 15 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alarm_cassettes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC315 views35 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новый Спилберг («День разоблачения») – это старый Спилберг, годами вынашивающий в зубе ядовитую капсулу, заправленную тлетворной наивностью, а после раскусивший её и выплюнувший в зрителя двухсполовинойчасовой реквием по реальности, которой нет и уже не будет никогда. Сказочные (долбоёбы) злодеи, что осознаются (прорабатываются) и добровольно сдаются; размышления о вере как панацее от войн (что?), но самое смешное –

❤‍🔥20👻8custom 51927848286043857445👾2

1 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC511 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

У «Синема Рутин» вышла новая книга, не прощупывающая, но давящая острым каблуком на нерв времени. Работа (исследование) посвящена динамике всеобъемлющего вторжения/проникновения медиа (в самом широком смысле) в ткань окружающей нас реальности: от бесконечно разгоняемого думскроллинга ради охватов до криптоторговли какими-нибудь пошлыми фантазиями звёзд. Кино, игры, реклама – всё это в какой-то незаметный миг стало пр

❤‍🔥14🙏4

25 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC759 views39 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Борясь с желанием заснуть и осознанием того, что сон не придёт, был вынужден провести время за чем-то стремительным, умещающимся в час с лишним зрелищем. Выбор пал на российский мок «Дом, в котором люди не живут», и час с лишним растянулся на два часа внутренних размышлений о том, почему всё так получилось и кто виноват. Нет смысла в поисках какой-то единственной истины: проблема, словно мицелий, разрослась во все ш

🙏18❤‍🔥12custom 51927848286043857449

19 Jul 2026, 19:37 UTC973 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Добавил «Обсессию» в небольшой список к фильмам, где внутри человека поселяется нечто паранормальное либо же преследует по пятам. Неотвратимо, незримо, без шанса на спасение. Если знаете что-то схожее по духу, то оставляйте ссылки и свои варианты.

❤‍🔥19

19 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC931 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Из очередного заплыва топориком в глубины прокрастинации, был выдернут каналом На майские едем в Хоргу на киносвидание, где мы вместе лицезрели хайп года «Обсессия». И такое бывает! «Obsession» – это буквально экранизация булгаковской фразы «бойся своих желаний», а заодно и манифестация решимости, которой в большинстве случаев вполне достаточно для желаемого результата. Карри Баркер, конечно, нахально стебётся над з

❤‍🔥22custom 53956075810518792966🙏3🌚1🤬1

13 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC≈1,050 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новая часть, говорят, получилась максимально зверской и безбашенной. А потому пропускать такое точно не стоит. Ниже информация, где можно будет посетить премьеру. С 16 июля на больших экранах — новая часть легендарной франшизы «Зловещие мертвецы: Пекло». Картину спродюсировали создатели предыдущих фильмов серии, бережно сохранившие дух оригинала, а главные роли исполнили восходящие звезды Сухейла Якуб («Экстаз», «Дю

❤‍🔥19🤬4

10 Jul 2026, 21:12 UTC967 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Живописно-сюрреальный постер фильма Night After Night – фантастического хоррора с настроением конспирологических триллеров 70-х. Как-то пропустил, что фильм Джоша Лобо, снявшего уютно-клаустрофобное кино про запертого в подвале дьявола, переполз из области слухов в пространство чего-то осязаемого, реального. Безмерно, конечно же, рад за авторов, которые практически спустя десять лет возвращаются и делают то, что ум

❤‍🔥18👻6🙏2

4 Jul 2026, 20:31 UTC≈1,180 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Будто бы ветер сквозь замочную скважину, хайп проникает и в такие далёкие предместья, как данный канал. Игнорировать «Obsession», конечно, вполне возможно, но мало ли что может произойти завтра. Я начал медленно подкрадываться к большому дебюту режиссёра, обогнув каждый его (доступный) короткий метр. Внезапно, но мне очень понравилось, как Карри Баркер взламывает реальность с помощью вторжения не то что не страшных,

❤‍🔥23🙏7👻5

1 Jul 2026, 20:34 UTC≈1,080 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Моя душа – потёмки, моё сознание – бесконечный лабиринт одинаковых комнат, растянутых или странным образом суженных в неправильном пространстве. Эти рекурсивные помещения внутри помещений, внутри клеток, что связаны, что ты чувствуешь, когда твоих рук касаются? Ладно, это из другого поля мысли. Комнаты забиты мебелью: стульями, кроватями, диванами, креслами, столами и лампами. Вполне возможно, что часть мебели сбежал

❤‍🔥24👾11🙏7🤬1

27 Jun 2026, 18:26 UTC≈1,150 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Hokum – третий фильм Дэмиэна Маккарти, где автор поднимается на уровень выше в плане бюджета и масштаба, но умудряется сохранить стилизацию и нишевость предыдущих картин. Главный герой – писатель, который приезжает в гостиницу где-то в ирландской глуши, дабы навестить место, в котором когда-то давно его родители провели медовый месяц. Но не всё так гладко в жизни сочинителя историй, и вот уже в первую ночь, изрядно

❤‍🔥24👻12👾7🌚1

17 Jun 2026, 20:12 UTC≈1,280 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Забавно, но «Saccharine» – это практически экранизация «Пожирателей призраков» с незначительными отступлениями. Суть буквально одна: таблетки/грибы, сделанные из мертвецов, после употребления вызывают, собственно, голодных призраков, преследующих несчастных героинь. Короче, ждать фильм по роману Чэпмена будто бы стало бессмысленно. Ужасы старения близких и принятия скоротечности жизни, показанные в «Реликвии» (оцени

❤‍🔥20🙏7🌚2👻1

16 Jun 2026, 18:06 UTC≈2,930 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На днях канал Abramacabre отметил день рождения, а сегодня, собственно, дату отмечает его ведущая – Marebito / Наташа Анопа. Честно, я уже не помню, как давно мы знакомы. Кажется, что целую вечность. В тревожном жанре, как известно, время – понятие очень условное, эфемерное и размытое. Точно помню, что тогда не было так много тематических каналов, как сейчас. Заход в тему казался чем-то, что ли, совсем аутсайдерским

❤‍🔥27👾2🙏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @alarm_cassettes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 135,226 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тревожные кассеты” (@alarm_cassettes), 1,590 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alarm_cassettes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.