Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Срочно! Мурманск

Channel

Срочно! Мурманск

@alarm_51

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,486subscribers

-79 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001235155196
TypeChannel
Username@alarm_51
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/alarm_51

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,48612,56512,525.57 August 2026 — 12,565 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,565 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,563 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,562 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,557 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,553 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,551 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,547 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,545 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,546 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,547 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,546 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,543 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,539 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,537 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,535 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,532 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,531 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,525 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,522 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,517 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,513 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,507 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,505 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,498 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,491 subscribers19 September 2026 — 12,486 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 43 days, net -79. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,474–12,577 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 07:1812,486-5
16 Sept 2026, 20:5712,491-7
13 Sept 2026, 07:4112,498-7
11 Sept 2026, 10:3712,505-2
8 Sept 2026, 17:4012,507-6
5 Sept 2026, 10:1712,513-4
3 Sept 2026, 15:1912,517-5
2 Sept 2026, 08:4812,522-3
1 Sept 2026, 09:0412,525-6
30 Aug 2026, 08:5512,531-1
28 Aug 2026, 08:2812,532-3
26 Aug 2026, 08:1412,535-2
25 Aug 2026, 05:3412,537-2
24 Aug 2026, 04:4312,539-4
22 Aug 2026, 14:0612,543-3
21 Aug 2026, 06:1312,546-1
20 Aug 2026, 05:2112,547+1
19 Aug 2026, 01:4412,546+1
16 Aug 2026, 21:4512,545-2
14 Aug 2026, 01:4812,547first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 12,486 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,440
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held56 (1 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total18,681
Reactions total234
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 21:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 47s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

796 reactions across 54 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬25131.5%
🤣20726.0%
678.42%
😁496.16%
😢475.90%
👍334.15%
🔥243.02%
👀192.39%
❤‍🔥141.76%
💯141.76%
👏121.51%
🙈121.51%
😱91.13%
70.879%
🤯70.879%
😨50.628%
😍40.503%
🙏40.503%
🗿30.377%
😈30.377%
4 further kinds50.628%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 796 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 16:27 UTC457 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️Новый современный порт для Северного морского пути появится в Архангельске. На полях ВЭФ Минвостокразвития России, правительство Архангельской области, ГК «Росатом» и АО «СПК Глубоководный порт Архангельск» заключили соглашение о строительстве глубоководного района морского порта - сообщил Юрий Сердечкин. Его планируется построить в Двинском заливе Белого моря: шесть терминалов для перевалки минеральных удо

🤣102😈1

1 Sept 2026, 07:36 UTC974 views35 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯Очередной камин-аут от залетного туриста с Рыбачьего. Проделать огромный путь, чтобы распахать к чертям тундру? Осуждаем.

🤬28💯4😢21

1 Sept 2026, 07:27 UTC980 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🥀 22 года назад произошла трагедия в Беслане 1 сентября 2004 года вооружённые террористы захватили школу №1 в Беслане во время праздничной линейки. В заложниках оказались 1128 человек — дети, родители и учителя. Почти трое суток их удерживали в заминированном спортзале без достаточного количества еды и воды.

😢13🙏32

31 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC≈1,150 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

💩Снова туалетная тема на оперативке «Сколько раз это можно обсуждать? Руки, что ли, надо поотрубать?.. Что нужно сделать, чтобы эти туалеты работали? Мы эти туалеты заставляем при благоустройстве поставить, а они стоят у нас мёртвым грузом. Но это же простая история. Первое - договор на обслуживание. Второе - контроль элементарный за исполнением этих обязательств по договору», - высказался Чибис.

🤣10👍2🔥1🗿1

31 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC≈1,160 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

😂Облезлые парклеты мигрируют по всему городу. Установили вот теперь на молодежке. Подальше от центра, но выкидывать жалко? Часто отдыхаете в этом месте?

🤣9🔥2🤬2

28 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC≈1,590 views28 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

😂😂😂😂Ловкость рук, ног и никакого мошенничества? «Мурманск, Коминтерна 9/1, асфальт положили вчера, сегодня пытаются сделать „ливнёвки“, смех и грех» Осмелюсь внести поправочку. На видео показан хитрый способ городских дорожников коммунальщиков устранить лужи. В асфальте длинным штырем пробивается незаметное отверстие, через которое вся вода с поверхности уходит, и лужа высыхает. Обычно так делают перед сдачей-приемк

🤬23🤣3😈2

27 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC≈1,790 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

💥С Россетей вновь пытаются взыскать миллионы из-за январского блэкаута. 26 августа в Арбитражный суд Мурманской области поступил иск АО "МЭС" к ПАО "Россети Северо-Запад" о взыскании убытков в размере 8 810 262 руб. 38 коп., причиненных нарушением надежности и качества электроснабжения, в связи с повреждением объектов электросетевого хозяйства 23 и 31 января 2026 года. Истцом указано, что нарушение ответчиком обяза

👍41

26 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC≈1,560 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🔥Мурманская область готова к возможным попыткам нападения на суда в акватории Северного морского пути, сообщил губернатор Андрей Чибис По его словам, регион намерен противодействовать угрозам с помощью современных технологий, а также опыта и смекалки северян. Интересно, а должность губернатора не переименуют в капитан-губернатора? 🔝Узнавайте о новостях Мурманска и области первыми. Подписаться

🤣14👀3👏1

26 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC≈1,600 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

😱Столбопад на Радищева. Аж две штуки навернулись. Спасибо, что не на головы. 🔝Узнавайте о новостях Мурманска и области первыми. Подписаться

🤣3👀2👏1

24 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC≈1,800 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

😱Скорее бы снег. Видимо, только на него надежда, что тротуар в самом центре города у Волны станет ровным. 🔝Узнавайте о новостях Мурманска и области первыми. Подписаться

🤬12🤣9

24 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC≈2,020 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🤔Клумб по Мурманску наставили, цветы туда напихали, отфоткали, красивые отчеты отправили и....забили. А про уход изначально не думали?

🤣8🤬4👀3

23 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC≈2,100 views36 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯Кощунство и позорище. В Мурманске билборды с Героями СВО исчезли. Их место заняли плакатики с достигаторством про +100500 отремонтированных дворов и кандидаты на предстоящих выборах. Мерзко. Очень мерзко.

🤬26🤣8💯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @alarm_51. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Мурманск | События | Подслушано
@Murmansk_podslushal · 36,463
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 September 2026
Мурманск | Новости | Происшествия
@Murmansk_crazy · 26,131
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
Мурманск Дтп Чп
@murmansk_chp · 63,693
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 21 August 2026
Новости Мурманска и Области
@murmansk_smi · 31,828
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 5 September 2026
Мурманск | Интересное | Новости
@Murmansk_tut · 25,670
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
Регион 51
@region_51m · 51,507
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
Полярный дозор
@polardozor · 25,000
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
Губернатор Чибис
@andrey_chibis · 31,535
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Срочно! Мурманск” (@alarm_51), 12,486 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alarm_51.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.