Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Al-Aqeedah

Channel

Al-Aqeedah

@alaqeedah99

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,544subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001106299859
TypeChannel
Username@alaqeedah99
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 March 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alaqeedah99

Growth

2,5432,5532,5486 August 2026 — 2,551 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,551 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,553 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,543 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,544 subscribers2,5446 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,542–2,555 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 15:292,544+1
13 Aug 2026, 07:142,543-10
10 Aug 2026, 09:022,553+2
7 Aug 2026, 19:362,551no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:322,551first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 25 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.3%
avg views ÷ 2,544 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held19 (25 May 202627 July 2026)
Views total4,402
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC≈1,290 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

As-Salamu 'Alaykum Now available: THE MUSLIM HUSBAND; rights, obligations, character & advice A book about the muslim husband with evidences from the Quran, Sunnah and athar. Written by Abu Hajar. Every young man should read this book before marrying, and the married men can benefit from it as a reminder. So share this book with the son, father, uncle, husband and everyone it is relevant for. Even the women can b

23 Jul 2026, 21:33 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Coming soon إن شاء الله

9 Jul 2026, 12:41 UTC≈1,560 viewsread 7 August 2026

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته In a few days our app will no longer be available on Apple App Store. If you want it then download it now. We will no longer develop and update the app. Barak Allahu feekum.

1 Jul 2026, 14:16 UTC≈2,110 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Question: If a book is not a translation of an original work, but contains narrations and quotes, how important for you is it that the Arabic text is included?

  1. Very important56%
  2. Important37%
  3. Makes no difference for me7%
  4. Not important4%
  5. Not important at all2%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Jun 2026, 12:38 UTC≈3,370 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Now available!! Get it on www.al-aqeedah.com or on Amazon. Or download and read it for free here:

23 Jun 2026, 17:49 UTC≈2,100 viewsread 7 August 2026

Assalamu Alaykum. One brother has donated money for the purpose of spreading the dawah with the books of Al-Aqeedah. May he find it in the scale of his good deeds on the Day of Resurrection. آمين Do you know a worthy dawah project or are you inviting someone who sincerely is interested in reading books from Al-Aqeedah, then contact us inshaAllah, and we will choose some projects to aid. @abuhajar7 Contact@al-aqeed

22 Jun 2026, 21:07 UTC≈2,030 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Coming soon, in shā Allāh. Sharh As-Sunnah by Al-Hasan ibn ‘Alī Al-Barbahārī (d. 329h) رَحِمَهُ اللهُ تَعَالَى Followed by: The i’tiqād of Ishāq ibn Rāhūyah (d. 234h) رحِمَهُ اللهُ تَعَالَى

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @alaqeedah99. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Jul 2026, 14:16 UTCAnonymous Poll342 voters

Question: If a book is not a translation of an original work, but contains narrations and quotes, how important for you is it that the Arabic text is included?

  1. Very important56%
  2. Important37%
  3. Makes no difference for me7%
  4. Not important4%
  5. Not important at all2%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 113,351 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Al-Aqeedah” (@alaqeedah99), 2,544 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alaqeedah99.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.