5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,876–2,885 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 17:56
2,877
-3
11 Aug 2026, 14:51
2,880
-2
8 Aug 2026, 08:08
2,882
-2
7 Aug 2026, 14:32
2,884
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:22
2,884
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.5%
avg views ÷ 2,877 subscribers
Avg views / post
676
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held
15 (25 June 2026 – 31 July 2026)
Views total
2,029
Reactions total
40
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 17s
Average length
17s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
194 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
191
98.5%
🤝
3
1.55%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 194reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
BITCOIN JUST HAD A $2K PULLBACK.
“THE BULL RUN IS OVER” IS WHAT A NORMAL LIQUIDITY RESET LOOKS LIKE.
No market breakdown or panic selling.
Just leverage getting flushed and weak hands getting shaken out.
Still heavy liquidity bids sitting at $60,000.
If buyers keep their bids there, this could be just another liquidity sweep.
If those bids disappear, Bitcoin may look for lower liquidity.
Do buyers step in, or …
While everyone is gambling on Base and Robinhood, I’m quietly on the biggest buying spree I’ve had in months.
These prices won’t stay this low for long.
70% OFF AND NOBODY CARES.
$ETH is in must-buy until this structure holds.
Now it’s trading near one of the strongest support zones on the chart, and sentiment couldn’t be worse.
Everyone is waiting for a breakout above $2.8K but ETH keeps finding buyers around $1.6K.
I’m happy accumulating while everyone else is waiting for confirmation.
Risk/Reward worth paying attention to.
🧠 Astra Nova shares next phase of $RVV roadmap.
The focus is shifting toward AI products, adoption and broader token utility.
It was recently added to NOWPayments, while Astra Nova continues building around AI infrastructure backed by Alibaba Cloud.
The next phase includes SocialFi, creator tools, staking, Nova Toons and eSports prize pools.
In 2027, the roadmap moves toward deeper AI integrations, global eSports…
$BTC dropped from $64,190 → $61,756 (-3.88%)
$ETH followed from $1,810 → $1,734 (-4.81%)
One Trump headline erased billions across crypto in hours.
One geopolitical headline.
Billions wiped.
TRUMP BREAKS SILENCE ON HIS $1.4 BILLION CRYPTO INCOME.
“There’s nothing illegal, there’s nothing wrong with it.”
“I’ve made a tremendous amount of money, and I let people invest it. I don’t even speak to them.”
Zero hesitation.
Crypto is the only industry where this somehow sounds like a normal Friday.
Love him or hate him
You have to admit this is one of the most crypto headlines you’ll read all week.
If you want to stack BTC, you should have the lowest fees + best liquidity
Great rewards like Xdrops and 8% deposit bonus, Its limited time
https://my.okx.com/join/ALAOUI
$ETH LIQUIDITY HUNT IS NOT OVER YET.
Ethereum is literally trapped between two giant magnets.
Below: $1,550 liquidity.
Above: $1,700 liquidity.
ETH isn’t deciding where to go. It’s deciding whose stop loss tastes better first.
It has incredible talent for making both bulls and bears feels like geniuses
🇪🇺 UNLICENSED CRYPTO EXCHANGES LOSE ACCESS TO EUROPE.
Any crypto service provider serving EU clients without MiCA authorisation will be stopping their services.
Choosing the right exchange matters more than ever.
OKX stands out with the best liquidity, lowest fees and 8% deposit bonus on every amount.
Example: deposit $100K and receive $8K, paid out every two weeks over one year while you still can trade
The off…
🚨ETHEREUM JUST LOST ITS PLACE.
$ETH is no longer a top 100 asset by global market cap.
Think about it once.
The chain that sparked DeFi, NFTs, and smart contracts is now ranked behind 100 other global assets.
Markets don’t care about legacy, they care about value.
Nothing stays on top forever.
In 2022 $BTC crashed over 80%.
People said it was dead, but Institutions quietly accumulated.
Then Bitcoin made new all-time highs.
Today
The correction looks different but emotions don’t.
Fear is back.
Doubt is everywhere.
Markets don’t transfer coins, but transfer conviction. DCA mode
❤12
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @alaouigems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 320,832 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alaoui INSIDER Calls👑” (@alaouigems), 2,877 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alaouigems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.