Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

‎ ХАНАФИТСКИЙ МАЗХАБ

@al_hanafy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,788subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001241284905
TypeChannel
Username@al_hanafy
Created21 March 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/al_hanafy

Growth

1,7881,7921,7906 August 2026 — 1,791 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,791 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,792 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,790 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,788 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,787–1,793 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:531,788-2
9 Aug 2026, 16:021,790-2
7 Aug 2026, 01:001,792+1
6 Aug 2026, 11:321,791no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:031,791first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 May 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

646 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍39060.4%
24037.2%
🥰60.929%
🔥50.774%
👏40.619%
🎉10.155%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 646reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2022 to 29 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Oct 2024, 05:50 UTC≈5,370 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fiqh_hanafiiyPhoto

https://t.me/fiqh_hanafiiy

29👍1

11 Sept 2024, 03:30 UTC≈6,660 viewsread 7 August 2026

Советуем подписаться на канал нашего брата 👆

11 Sept 2024, 03:29 UTC≈6,020 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fiqh_hanafiiy

📚С именем Аллаха - Милостивого, Милующего. Хвала Аллаху - Господу миров. Мир и благословение Его Посланнику, членам его семьи, и всем его сподвижникам, а затем: Уважаемые братья и сестры, если на то будет Воля Всевышнего Аллаха, на этом канале будут публиковаться различные пользы, связанные с ханафитским мазхабом. На сколько часто у меня получится делиться с вами этими пользами, знает только Аллах, Свят Он и Велик,

👍328

19 May 2024, 17:42 UTC≈10,000 views78 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⠀ 📌 О ханафитах и ханафитском мазхабе.. Не все ханафиты автоматически являются матуридитами, также как не все шафииты это ашариты. Просто выбрасывать человека, придерживающегося в Фикхе ханафитского мазхаба из Ахлюс-Сунны (саляфия) большая несправедливость и заблуждение. В свое время в Бугуруслане, например, работало большое медресе, в котором преподавалась саляфитская акыда, там училось много татар-ханафитов, так

👍5127

19 May 2024, 17:42 UTC≈5,520 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

👍31

25 Sept 2023, 14:06 UTC≈22,700 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⠀ 🗣 Религию посланников меняют нововведения ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ — Сказал Ахмад ар-Руми аль-Ханафи (1043 г/х): “Именно совершение нововведений изменило религию посланников и поменяло их законодательства. Ведь если бы было разрешено добавлять что-либо в религию, то было бы разрешено совершать фарз утреннего намаза четыре (4) ракаата, а фарз полуденного шесть (6) ракаатов. При этом можно было бы сказать: «Это добавление

👍3522

10 Sept 2023, 20:45 UTC≈14,500 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⠀ ✓ Испытание Ибн Аби аль-Изза аль-Ханафи Ибн Аби аль-Изз аль-Ханафи – известный учёный ханафит на салафитской акыде, автор шарха на «Тахавию», ученик Ибн аль-Къаййима — Сказал шейх Фейсал Ибн Зейд аль Мутейри: “Большой ученый Ибн Аби аль-Изз аль-Ханафи (да помилует его Аллах) порицал нововведенцев ашаритов и суфиев, включая порицание их прошения через Пророка ﷺ. И они написали султанам и судьям, и он был брошен

👍2814

30 Sept 2022, 22:20 UTC≈16,200 views61 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⠀ 💬 В книге «ат-Таджнис» (автор: аль-Маргинани, ум. 593 г.х.) передано, что к Шамсульаимма аль-Хальвани (ум. 456 г.х.) обратились с вопросом о лентяях среди обычных мусульман, которые совершают утреннюю молитву (фаджр), когда уже восходит Солнце. Нужно ли запрещать им так поступать? Он ответил: “Нет. Потому что если запретить им поступать таким образом, то они вообще оставят молитву. Лучше пусть выполняют ее так – у

👍3922

21 Sept 2022, 01:33 UTC≈12,100 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⠀ — Говорит Ахмад Рафи’ ат-Тахтави аль-Ханафи (ум. 1231 г.х.): “У нас (ханафитов) повторные протирания головы не считаются сунной, как это сказано в «Фатх аль-Кадир» и «аль-Фатава ат-татархания». Также у нас решено, что если кто-то протрет голову три раза, смачивая каждый раз руки свежей водой, то это не будет нежелательным. Однако, не будет также и сунной. Как и не будет считаться выражением шариатской культуры пове

👍313

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @al_hanafy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“‎ ХАНАФИТСКИЙ МАЗХАБ” (@al_hanafy), 1,788 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/al_hanafy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.