Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for السَّادَةُ_الْحَنَابِلَةُ

Channel

السَّادَةُ_الْحَنَابِلَةُ

@al_hanabila_sadti

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,106subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001270327245
TypeChannel
Username@al_hanabila_sadti
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/al_hanabila_sadti

Growth

1,1041,1111,107.52 September 2026 — 1,104 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,105 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,110 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,111 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,106 subscribers1,1062 September 202615 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 13 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,103–1,112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 13:391,106-5
12 Sept 2026, 05:161,111+1
8 Sept 2026, 08:001,110+5
3 Sept 2026, 10:111,105+1
2 Sept 2026, 07:451,104first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 30 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.53%
avg views ÷ 1,106 subscribers
Avg views / post
50.1
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held10 (30 August 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total501
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 07:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 15:32 UTC35 viewsread 2 September 2026

بَابُ (مَا أَكْرَمَ اللهُ تَعَالَىٰ نَبِيَّهُ - صَلَّىٰ اللّٰهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - بَعْدَ مَوْتِهِ) _ عَنْ نُبَيْهِ بْنِ وَهْبٍ أَنَّ كَعْبًا دَخَلَ عَلَى عَائِشَةَ ، فَذَكَرُوا رَسُولَ اللهِ - صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - ، فَقَالَ كَعْبٌ : مَا مِنْ يَوْمٍ يَطْلُعُ إِلَّا نَزَلَ سَبْعُونَ أَلْفًا مِنَ الْمَلَائِكَةِ ، حَتَّى يَحُفُّوا بِقَبْرِ النَّبِيِّ - صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - يَضْرِبُونَ بِأَجْن…

Signed عمر العمودي الحنبلي

31 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC62 viewsread 2 September 2026

(الجبهان الخارجي يطعن في جعفر الصادق، إمام من أهل بيت النبي ﷺ، ثم يسمي ذلك تحقيقاً!) ___ #الوهابية_والنابتة_الخوارج لم يسلم منهم حتّى بيت نبوة، طعنوا في الصحابة والتابعين وأئمة السلف الصالح، ولم يتركوا أحداً إلا وطعنوا فيه؛ كل هذا باسم التوحيد ونواقض الإسلام وغيرها. هل يملك الجبهان الخارجي دليلاً على طعنه في الإمام جعفر الصادق؟ من أعجب ما في كلام إبراهيم الجبهان الخارجي أنه طعن في الإمام جعفر بن محمد الصادق رضي الل…

Signed عمر العمودي الحنبلي

31 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC51 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

https://t.me/al_hanabila_sadti Follow the قَنَاةُ السَّادَةِ الْحَنَابِلَةِ channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaj7I6B3mFY7Nu3QOF0f

Signed عمر العمودي الحنبلي

31 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC34 viewsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @alhathlanFile

رسالة في الدعاء والأوراد للشيخ المتفنن مرعي الكرمي.

Signed عمر العمودي الحنبلي

31 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC56 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

https://t.me/al_hanabila_sadti Follow the قَنَاةُ السَّادَةِ الْحَنَابِلَةِ channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaj7I6B3mFY7Nu3QOF0f

Signed عمر العمودي الحنبلي

31 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC47 viewsread 2 September 2026

العلم لا يعرف المجاملة، والنصوص لا تُحقق بالعاطفة، والتراث لا يُصان بالانتقاء. ومن أراد أن ينتصر لمذهبه فلينتصر له بالدليل، لا بالقص، ومن أراد أن ينتصر لعقيدته فلينتصر لها بالحجة، لا بحذف المخالف من كتب الأئمة. فالكتب أمانة، والمخطوطات شهادة، وكلام العلماء تاريخ، ومن عبث بالشهادة ليصنع تاريخًا على هواه، فقد أساء إلى العلم قبل أن يسيء إلى خصمه. وبعد هذا وأمثاله، لا يجوز منح الثقة المطلقة بتحقيقات #الوهابية_والنابتة…

Signed عمر العمودي الحنبلي

31 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC44 viewsread 2 September 2026

(من تحقيق التراث إلى تحريفه: خيانات #الوهابية_والنابتة_الخوارج للنصوص الحنبلية وغيرها!) __ كشف التحريفات حين يتحول «تحقيق التراث» إلى إعادة تشكيله على مقاس المذهب! من أخطر ما يُبتلى به التراث العلمي أن ينتقل المحقق من وظيفة الأمين على النص إلى وظيفة الرقيب على مضمونه، فيُبقي من كلام العلماء ما يوافق تصوره، ويُسقط ما لا ينسجم معه، ثم يقدم للقارئ النص مبتورًا وكأنه هو النص الذي تركه المؤلف! ومن النماذج الصارخة على ذل…

Signed عمر العمودي الحنبلي

30 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC63 viewsread 2 September 2026

المنشور السادس في تقرير طريقة الفقهاء والأئمة في التعامل مع الحديث الضعيف، وانتبه له جيدا: قال الإمام أحمد رضي الله عنه: "الناس كلهم أكفاء إلا الحائك والحجام والكساح". فقيل له: تأخذ بحديث: (كل الناس أكفاء إلا حائكا أو حجاما)، وأنت تضعفه؟! فقال: إنما نضعف إسناده، ولكن العمل عليه. ‎ فانظر كيف أخذ به وقال إن عمل العلماء عليه مع تصريحه بتضعيفه لإسناده! المنشور السابع في تقرير ما ذكرناه في درسنا لزاد المستقنع من طريقة الف…

Signed عمر العمودي الحنبلي

30 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC52 viewsread 2 September 2026

#إعادة_نشر قال شيخنا الجليل - محمد محمد الأزهري الحنبلي حفظه اللّٰه: تكلمت أمس في درس شرح "زاد المستقنع" على طريقة الأئمة في: التعامل مع الحديث الضعيف، والاستدلال عامة، والفرق بين احتجاج الإمام أحمد واحتجاج بعض الفقهاء المتأخرين، والعبث المعاصر في هذه الأبواب. وكنت قد نقلت بعض النقول في هذا أثناء الدرس، وكتبت في هذا كثيرا منذ سنوات هنا، وتكلمت عليه في دروس كثيرة. وإفادة لطلابي في درس "الزاد"، ولغيرهم من المتابعين فس…

Signed عمر العمودي الحنبلي

30 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC57 viewsread 2 September 2026

قال شيخ الإسلام الإمامُ موفقُ الدّين ابنُ قدامةَ رحمه اللّٰه: إنَّ النوافل والفضائل لا يُشترط صحة الحديث فيها. وقال الإمام ابن تيمية رحمه اللّٰه: ‏المستحبّات يُحتجّ فيها بالأحاديث الضعاف إذا لم يكن فيها تغيير أصل. https://t.me/al_hanabila_sadti Follow the قَنَاةُ السَّادَةِ الْحَنَابِلَةِ channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaj7I6B3mFY7Nu3QOF0f

Signed عمر العمودي الحنبلي

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @al_hanabila_sadti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Alafasy - مشاري راشد العفاسي
@AlafasyM · 38,515
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 September 2026
Cyfer🇩🇪🇩🇪 ...(Mohamed Ali)
@learnmohamedali · 29,951
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 8 September 2026
🍃🌸 التفاؤل عبادة 🌸🍃
@abadtaltfaol · 35,685
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“السَّادَةُ_الْحَنَابِلَةُ” (@al_hanabila_sadti), 1,106 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/al_hanabila_sadti.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.