Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AKM Fed Proof

Channel

AKM Fed Proof

@akm_fed_proofs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001951419065
TypeChannel
Username@akm_fed_proofs
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/akm_fed_proofs

Growth

171817.512 August 2026 — 18 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17 subscribers12 August 202620 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17–18 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 11:0517-1
13 Aug 2026, 00:0118no change
12 Aug 2026, 23:4918first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 18 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

9 Nov 2024, 21:02 UTC123 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔺Fedban : #00024 Offence no-1 : Proof no -1 Manipulative/ cheating/ hypocritical behaviour towards boys. Getting boys involved into intimate relations and spreading the act as she is a good soul/ thus picturing the opposite person as bad and worse, by saying they forced her for the same.

9 Nov 2024, 20:50 UTC108 viewsread 13 August 2026

❗️Fedban : #00024 🔺Name : ⏤͟͞ 『🇮🇳』𝞝𝙑𝙄𝙇 𝞓𝙏𝙏𝙄𝙏𝙐𝘿𝞝℡ ID : 7071459850 🚫No of offenses : 1

20 Jun 2024, 13:47 UTC148 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔺Fedban : #00023 Offence no-1 : Proof no -1 Abusives, disrespect towards members.

20 Jun 2024, 13:40 UTC134 viewsread 13 August 2026

❗️Fedban : #00023 🔺Name : 𝑩ꪖ𝔟ꪶꪮꪮℌ🌻 ID : 7150330928 Alt id : 🚫No of offenses : 2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @akm_fed_proofs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AKM Fed Proof” (@akm_fed_proofs), 17 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akm_fed_proofs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.