Channel
@akiuntansi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001860698977 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @akiuntansi |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/akiuntansi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 1 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 1 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
88 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 45 | 51.1% | |
| ❤ | 28 | 31.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 12.5% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.27% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2024 to 9 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🗳 10 July. - Asta. @hGetir - 𝐀gha pending - Ghazam @Ghazamalt - @Sirpecandu - Javiero @Undeathlyie - marce. @qcutiecato - 𓍼 🍇 𔖳 ꒰ sᥱіkᥲ ᥒᥱᑲᥙᥣᥲ 命📹 ꒱ @Seikysmri STOP TIKUNG KOCAK - Laverna Rn. @ffYeji - Keithara @anaksangarr - Adhiarja. - temp] dni. Bintang @oLeadonghyuck - Ryné @ChoiJungeugn - Tqvuellē Arthamez. @iBelantara - Nathan R. E. @wonujwn - REYMOND—V - @vSCRATCHED, Arvin's Lovetaker. - @Bezrandal - Clarie Ri…
🍓45❤23❤🔥9
Sticker, posted without a caption
Milik @iJeongJaehyiun. Kesan pertama & deskripsi pendek; Jasver, kalah dari kesan pertama sih dia anaknya kelihatan kayak yang sangar serem gitu, sih?? Secara akun dia tuh kelihatan cakep anjay, keren gitu. Gue ngiranya dia orang yang irit typing dan hard to approach gitu. Tapi setelah beberapa lama mutualan dan pertama interaksi tuh ternyata Jasver anak yang lumayan asik dan mudah berbaur. Kalau interaksi sama Jasv…
🔥1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Milik @cherrievhottesxt. Kesan pertama & deskripsi pendek; Kaynara, gue panggilnya Kaynara aja yaa biar gampang. Kalau dari kesan pertama sih, Kaynara anaknya memang yang kelihatan cukup mengintimidasi, sempet ngira kalau dia anaknya irit typing gitu. Tapi ternyata Kay anaknya aktif, kalau ngetik selalu dijelasin sepanjang apapun itu, anaknya juga manis, selalu interaksi sama mutualnya lewat berbagai cara. Kalau lih…
❤🔥1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Milik @jihanfuffly. Kesan pertama & deskripsi pendek; nah kalau kali ini ada Livia, pacar Jisung seorang katanya. Anaknya bener-bener bucin Jisung abiezz. Gue lupa deh Pi kesan pertama lu gimana, tapi, lu anaknya dari awal memang udah asik, mudah berbaur dan gak sungkan buat interaksi sama siapapun, enjoy banget kalau interaksi sama Pipoy. Pipoy anaknya kadang absurd banget, beneran tingkahnya gak bisa ditebak. Livi…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Milik @Tijny. Kesan pertama & deskripsi singkat; kalau ini Ishaha, kesayangannya gue juga. Kalau dari kesan pertama, itu awalnya asing, karena kita gak pernah mutualan tiba-tiba main bareng. Pas main itu, Isha kelihatan sedikit kikuk ya, tapi gak menutup kemungkinan dia anaknya juga ramah kok. Walau kelihatan kikuk, tapi seiring berjalannya waktu (pas main sih) Isha tuh mulai blak-blakan juga, HAHAHA. Dan gak kerasa…
❤1💋1🔥1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Milik @Eithnye. Kesan pertama & deskripsi singkat; Hagia, kalau ini sayangnya gue dari jaman baheula. Hagia kalau dilihat dari kesan pertama pas awal kenal, anaknya memang udah ramah, baik, dan mudah berbaur. Gue masih inget banget gimana bisa kenal sama Hagi, gue tiba-tiba join kanalnya dan berujung dichat sama Hagi, HAHAHA. Sejauh ini temenan sama Hagi, gue suka dipanggil 'Kakak' sama Hagii, beneran anaknya baik d…
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @akiuntansi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,313,186 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@akiuntansi named 20 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Arsip.” (@akiuntansi), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akiuntansi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.