🔴سه گزینه اصلی برای معرفی وزیر نفت به مجلس، جهانگیری گزینه اصلی / نظر قالیباف و پزشکیان با کیست؟ ▪️طبق اخبار واصله، تا اینجا نام سه گزینه برای معرفی به عنوان وزیر نفت پیشنهادی جهت استعلام، به نهادهای امنیتی ارسال شده. ▪️اسحاق جهانگیری گزینه اصلی دولت برای وزارت نفت است. بعد از کنار گذاشتن نام محمد اسلامی، حالا نام معاون اول رئیسجمهور در دولت روحانی مطرح شده که البته برای گرفتن رای اعتماد از مجلس کار سختی دارد. ▪…

Channel
اخبار نفتی
@akhbar_nafti
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,810subscribers
-190 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001491447653 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @akhbar_nafti |
| Description | 🔴رصد لحظهای اخبار نفت و انرژی از منابع موثق ✍هدف ما اطلاع رسانی درست به شماست! ارتباط: @nafti_admin |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/akhbar_nafti |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:36 | 6,810 | -4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:28 | 6,814 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:34 | 6,821 | -9 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:57 | 6,830 | -3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:06 | 6,833 | -11 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 6,844 | -6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:47 | 6,850 | -8 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:05 | 6,858 | -9 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 09:16 | 6,867 | -10 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 6,877 | -26 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 6,903 | -8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 6,911 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 6,912 | -12 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:35 | 6,924 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 6,935 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 6,939 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 6,951 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 6,952 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 6,962 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 6,969 | first reading |
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 33.1%
- avg views ÷ 6,810 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,250
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 49 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 49 (15 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 36,020 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 00:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,330
- Videos
- ≈785
- Links
- ≈55
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 26m 18s
- Average length
- 1m 33s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔴چرا پزشکیان، عامل بر باد رفتن ۴٫۷ میلیارد دلار پول کشور را به جای معرفی به دادگاه، به عنوان مشاور خود منصوب کرد؟ 🛢@akhbar_nafti
آقای قربانزاده گفتن ۴.۷ میلیارد دلار پول نفت برنگشته و به اصطلاح هاپولی شده! حالا مسئول فروش نفت کی بوده؟ آقای #بورد! بعد استعفای #پاکنژاد کی سرپرست وزارت نفت شده؟ حمید بورد که قبلش رئیس شرکت ملی نفت ایران بوده! فیلم #کمدی است؟ 🛢@akhbar_nafti
اینکه در مناظره دیشب، اشتری چیشد مهم نیست خیلی، ما که میدونستیم وضعیت رو؛ کلا عدالتخواهی در ایران پروژه شده! مهمتر اینه در دوران پاکنژاد ۴.۷ میلیارد دلار پول ملت هاپولی شده! و بعد عزل بجای دادگاه رفته مشاور پزشکیان شده! جناب اژه ای ایا نباید این فرد محاکمه بشه؟ 🛢@akhbar_nafti
🎥بزرگترین تخلف تاریخ در دولت پزشکیان به روایت مشاور قالیباف / قربانزاده: وزیر نفت پزشکیان با تخلف یک میلیون و ۲۶۹ هزار میلیارد تومانی (۴.۷ میلیارد دلار) باید محاکمۀ صحرایی شود ▪️مشاور قالیباف: در هیچ کشوری نداریم که یک نفر که ۷۸۰ میلیون دلار بدهکار بوده، نفت را ببرد و پنهانکاری کند و در آخر ۴.۷ میلیارد دلار از سرمایۀ کشور برنگردد. ▪️آیا قوه قضاییه با تخلف وزیر نفت دولت پزشکیان همانند ترک فعل وزرای دولت شهید رییسی…
🎥ظرفیتهای مجمع تقویت شود ▪️سرپرست وزارت نفت در بیستوهشتمین نشست وزارتی مجمع کشورهای صادرکننده گاز با تأکید بر اینکه این مجمع باید توانایی خود را برای شناسایی زودهنگام مخاطرات، تحلیل سناریوهای بحرانی و ارائه پاسخهای هماهنگ تقویت کند گفت: به این منظور، لازم است موضوع بازنگری در راهبرد بلندمدت مجمع با تأکید بر تقویت زنجیره ارزش گاز طبیعی در دستورکار قرار گیرد. 🛢@akhbar_nafti
🔴رئیس کمیسیون انرژی: درگیریها ازسرگرفته شود نفت ۱۵۰ دلار را رد میکند حجتالاسلام احمدی: ▪️اگر بازارهای جهانی در پایان روز کاری جمعه بسته نمیشدند و معاملات ادامه پیدا میکرد، قیمت نفت به ۱۲۰ دلار در هر بشکه میرسید. ▪️در روزها و هفتههای آینده عرضه نفت مجدد کاهش پیدا خواهد کرد و بنابراین افزایش قیمتها شتاب بیشتری خواهد گرفت. ▪️اگر درگیریها ازسرگرفته شود احتمال رسیدن قیمتها به ۱۵۰ دلار نیز وجود دارد و پساز آن…
🔴حضور دوباره بابک زنجانی در شبکه فروش نفت و گاز؟! ▪️در روزهای اخیر، برخی گزارشها و اظهارنظرها از احتمال حضور مجدد بابک زنجانی در شبکه فروش نفت و گاز ایران حکایت میکند؛ موضوعی که با واکنشهای متفاوت و ابهامات رسمی همراه شده است. ▪️بر اساس این گزارشها، نام زنجانی بار دیگر در ارتباط با فروش نفت مطرح شده و برخی نمایندگان مجلس و مدیران سابق بانک مرکزی از بهکارگیری دوباره او در این شبکه خبر دادهاند. همچنین سخنانی در…
🔴 محسن پاکنژاد عزل شد، اما حامد ایزدی خیر! ▪️ یک پرسش ساده: چرا حامد ایزدی، رئیس سازمان حراست صنعت نفت، در مورد تراستیها سکوت کرده است؟ ▪️ چگونه است که محسن پاکنژاد به علت تخلفات گسترده در حوزه تراستیها عزل شد، اما حامد ایزدی که در وزارت نفت نقش نظارتی داشته و سکوت اختیار کرده، همچنان رئیس سازمان حراست وزارت نفت باقی مانده است؟ ▪️آیا کمیسیون اصل نود مجلس به موضوع حامد ایزدی ورود خواهد کرد؟ 🛢@akhbar_nafti
🔴 حمید بورد وزیر نفت خواهد شد؟ ▪️براساس شنیده ها، محمدحسن محمدی، که در ۱۴ اسفند ۱۴۰۴ با حکم حمید بورد بهعنوان معاون تجارت و امور بینالملل شرکت ملی نفت ایران منصوب شد، از یک سو، و سیدمحمدمهدی احمدی، مدیرعامل بانک شهر، از سوی دیگر، برای وزیر شدن حمید بورد تلاش میکنند. باید دید حمید بورد نهایتاً وزیر خواهد شد یا خیر؟ 🛢@akhbar_nafti
🔴 امید شاکری از شرکت NPC رفتنی شد ▪️شنیدهها حاکی از برکناری قریبالوقوع امید شاکری از مدیرعاملی شرکت ملی صنایع پتروشیمی است. نبود تخصص کافی شاکری موجب انتقادات گسترده متخصصان صنعت پتروشیمی شده است. 🛢@akhbar_nafti
🔴 بر اساس مصوبه هیات وزیران، با تشخیص وزارت نفت تا پایان شرایط اضطرار در کشور، قیمتگذاری خوراک و فرآوردههای پالایشی و پتروشیمی در چهارچوب ابلاغیه شماره ۹۰۳ تاریخ ۲۳ دی ماه ۱۴۰۲ وزارت نفت تعیین خواهد شد. 🛢@akhbar_nafti
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @akhbar_nafti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@akhbar_nafti named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@vakilyar1 · 19,322
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 1 October 2026
@Qods_org · 18,885
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 October 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اخبار نفتی” (@akhbar_nafti), 6,810 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akhbar_nafti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.