Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Комната Госпожи Валери 🪄

Channel

Комната Госпожи Валери 🪄

@akanimiraivalerie

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

104subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001591494402
TypeChannel
Username@akanimiraivalerie
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/akanimiraivalerie

Growth

10410610513 August 2026 — 106 subscribers14 August 2026 — 106 subscribers30 August 2026 — 104 subscribers13 August 202630 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 17 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 104–106 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 12:44104-2
14 Aug 2026, 16:32106no change
13 Aug 2026, 16:47106first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

100 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53957361508978653523636.0%
custom 53616507277960936492121.0%
custom 53485309985711892611515.0%
custom 523336935756375058999.00%
custom 534831614712717533188.00%
custom 543184385505599063488.00%
custom 524934102667758552833.00%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC26 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @valerieovaPhoto

Смотрю солнечное затмение ♉️ Совсем чуть чуть и будет метеоритный дождь!

custom 54318438550559906348custom 53483161471271753314

31 Jul 2026, 20:01 UTC70 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Это чтобы не расслаблялись. В фф два шипа, но кто за какой болеет… дело ваше. Мое тоже, поэтому получайте команда Сиэлери

custom 53957361508978653528

31 Jul 2026, 19:34 UTC72 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53485309985711892617

17 Jul 2026, 17:10 UTC97 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🖤🖤🖤🤍🤍🤍🤍 6. Лау замечает странную трость и говорит, что видел подобные знаки раньше. Как думаете, это обычная деталь или важная зацепка на будущее? 7. История, которую Сиэль придумал для Валери, показалась вам убедительной? Нашли ли вы в ней слабые места?

custom 53616507277960936493

17 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC89 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🤩Ещё вопросики! 🖤🖤🖤🤍🤍🤍🤍 3. Почему Сиэль не смог дозваться Себастьяна? Он просто опоздал из-за обстоятельств, что-то ему помешало или может быть дворецкий просто в край обнаглел? 4. Какой момент расследования вызвал у вас больше всего подозрений? 5. Если бы вы оказались на месте Валери, как бы поступили, когда графа старались всячески унизить?

custom 53616507277960936493

16 Jul 2026, 10:36 UTC79 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🖤🖤➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🤩Раз большинство уже прочитали главу, постараюсь подпитать ваш интерес и начну рубрику с вопросами! 🤩 Итак переходим к первым! 🖤🖤🖤🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 1. Как вы думаете, кто тот самый практикант принявший звонок ту ночь? 2. Как думаете, что сейчас является самой важной уликой, хотя герои пока этого не понимают? Что это за улика? Связана ли она с кем-то?

custom 53616507277960936495custom 52333693575637505891custom 53483161471271753311

15 Jul 2026, 13:49 UTC81 viewsread 13 August 2026
Poll

🤩 Прочитали ли вы новую главу?

  1. Да!71%
  2. Ноу!29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC97 viewsread 13 August 2026

Забыла добавить ответ с «да, давай вопросы»

12 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC105 viewsread 13 August 2026
Poll

🤩🤩После новой главы 🤩🤩мы так ничего и не обсудили! 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩Хотите поотвечать на вопросики? Может, у кого-то появились интересные теории или мысли, которыми хочется поделиться?

  1. Да это скорее у меня есть вопросики 🦋43%
  2. Да я и не против обсудить, было бы с кем 🤩57%
  3. Давай что-то другое 🦋0%
  4. У меня есть другое предложение 🤩0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jul 2026, 15:25 UTC73 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔸🔸🔸🔸 Как приятно видеть его там! 🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🤩Кстати! благодаря подписанной всеми вами петиции, рейтинг фанфика был повышен до NC - 17. На самом деле я и не думала что придется повысить рейтинг, но глава оказалась чуть чуть жестокой. Следующая не будет лучше, надеюсь не придется повышать снова… А, и да, новая обложка!

custom 539573615089786535211custom 53483161471271753313

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @akanimiraivalerie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Jul 2026, 13:49 UTCAnonymous Poll14 voters

🤩 Прочитали ли вы новую главу?

  1. Да!71%
  2. Ноу!29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTCAnonymous Poll7 voters

🤩🤩После новой главы 🤩🤩мы так ничего и не обсудили! 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩Хотите поотвечать на вопросики? Может, у кого-то появились интересные теории или мысли, которыми хочется поделиться?

  1. Да это скорее у меня есть вопросики 🦋43%
  2. Да я и не против обсудить, было бы с кем 🤩57%
  3. Давай что-то другое 🦋0%
  4. У меня есть другое предложение 🤩0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Комната Госпожи Валери 🪄” (@akanimiraivalerie), 104 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akanimiraivalerie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.