Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ajeet.btp OG

Channel

Ajeet.btp OG

@ajeetbtp

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

71,681subscribers

-2,454 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002191607346
TypeChannel
Username@ajeetbtp
DescriptionEsports bgmi gaming channel
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ajeetbtp

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

71,68174,13572,90813 August 2026 — 74,135 subscribers14 August 2026 — 74,059 subscribers16 August 2026 — 73,967 subscribers17 August 2026 — 73,853 subscribers18 August 2026 — 73,743 subscribers19 August 2026 — 73,668 subscribers20 August 2026 — 73,618 subscribers21 August 2026 — 73,478 subscribers23 August 2026 — 73,389 subscribers24 August 2026 — 73,223 subscribers25 August 2026 — 73,147 subscribers26 August 2026 — 73,066 subscribers27 August 2026 — 73,021 subscribers28 August 2026 — 72,982 subscribers29 August 2026 — 72,912 subscribers30 August 2026 — 72,830 subscribers31 August 2026 — 72,772 subscribers1 September 2026 — 72,682 subscribers2 September 2026 — 72,619 subscribers4 September 2026 — 72,552 subscribers6 September 2026 — 72,444 subscribers9 September 2026 — 72,185 subscribers11 September 2026 — 72,006 subscribers13 September 2026 — 71,874 subscribers15 September 2026 — 71,802 subscribers17 September 2026 — 71,681 subscribers13 August 202617 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 35 days, net -2,454. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71,313–74,503 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 05:3971,681-121
15 Sept 2026, 04:3871,802-72
13 Sept 2026, 15:5671,874-132
11 Sept 2026, 23:3972,006-179
9 Sept 2026, 16:3772,185-259
6 Sept 2026, 12:1972,444-108
4 Sept 2026, 02:3772,552-67
2 Sept 2026, 17:2872,619-63
1 Sept 2026, 15:5772,682-90
31 Aug 2026, 15:3772,772-58
30 Aug 2026, 16:3572,830-82
29 Aug 2026, 20:0472,912-70
28 Aug 2026, 17:2672,982-39
27 Aug 2026, 15:3873,021-45
26 Aug 2026, 18:2873,066-81
25 Aug 2026, 20:3373,147-76
24 Aug 2026, 23:4773,223-166
23 Aug 2026, 12:1773,389-89
21 Aug 2026, 23:5573,478-140
20 Aug 2026, 15:0673,618first reading

Engagement

2 posts held, back to 3 June 2026the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👌1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 3 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @ajeetbtp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ajeet.btp OG” (@ajeetbtp), 71,681 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ajeetbtp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.