Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Aizik-made horrors beyond your comprehension

@aizctxt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001886974766
TypeChannel
Username@aizctxt
DescriptionDefinitely the telegram channel ever
Created18 November 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/aizctxt

Growth

107 August 2026 — 10 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9–11 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:1610no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:4610first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
60
Videos
1
Links
18

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

23 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🌭2295.7%
💩14.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2025 to 30 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jan 2026, 18:29 UTC40 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Что-то не верю, прошло мало времени вряд-ли они параллельно разрабатывали

30 Jan 2026, 13:23 UTC38 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня узнал, что в 1820-1830 годах было модно неправильно писать слова и поэтому мы имеем ОК, который должен быть All Correct

🌭1

23 Jan 2026, 07:25 UTC38 viewsread 12 August 2026

Только вот читал про Ordo Beatae Mariae Virginis Gloriosae, рыцарский орден в Италии, который принимал женщин и давал звания militiss и вот: https://youtu.be/MzjshfDkW1c?si=-C7GEA_m7VT9E208

22 Dec 2025, 12:54 UTC43 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @usilenie_plusPhoto

Спешу вновь прервать радиомолчание, чтобы и вы тоже узнали что базовой текстурой для планеты в одном из орбитальных шотов Star Trek TNG была использована фотография собачьего говна. https://youtu.be/o3r2EGlsaYY?t=604

🌭1

13 Nov 2025, 09:05 UTC52 viewsread 12 August 2026

Ура возрождение вне жанрового кино https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaSxNAZUKsM

3 Nov 2025, 08:50 UTC48 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Иногда думаю об этом обмене сообщениями

27 Aug 2025, 13:30 UTC32 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я просто оставлю это здесь

🌭2

27 Aug 2025, 13:30 UTC50 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @usilenie_plusPhoto

Друзья, мы наконец в этой точке. Искренне рад за всех нас, открываем шампанское. Дальше будет только лучше. https://semgrep.dev/blog/2025/security-alert-nx-compromised-to-steal-wallets-and-credentials/

🌭2

23 Aug 2025, 17:21 UTC39 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я уверен, что к релизу освещение исправят, но все равно смешно

🌭2💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @aizctxt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Aizik-made horrors beyond your comprehension” (@aizctxt), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aizctxt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.