Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐴𝑖𝑟𝑜𝑤!¡ 𑀝VᏵ🌹

@airow_cvg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003848270349
TypeChannel
Username@airow_cvg
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 7 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/airow_cvg

Growth

812 Aug 2026, 19:31 — 8 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 12:07 — 8 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 19:3113 Aug 2026, 12:07
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7–9 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:078no change
12 Aug 2026, 19:318first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 7 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 3 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5348174546350406909428.6%
custom 5348254875123741873321.4%
custom 5307685533168726735214.3%
custom 534815288683033185817.14%
custom 534822484041744150117.14%
custom 535742541198474908717.14%
custom 540031832265696608917.14%
🍓17.14%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 7 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 May 2026, 16:18 UTC353 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

▫️▫️▫️▫️🏍 Audition 🐈‍⬛ 🎁🔤а данный момент мы в поиске наших прекрасных двух участниц под прототипом Сакуры и Казухи! Очень будем рады каждой заявке) Удачи вам ребята!🩸 Бот: @A1rovv_bot 🎁Анкета и остальные правила в комментариях 🐈‍⬛

custom 53076855331687267352custom 53481745463504069091custom 53574254119847490871custom 54003183226569660891

7 May 2026, 16:14 UTC25 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🍓1custom 53481745463504069091custom 53482548751237418731

7 May 2026, 16:14 UTC22 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩EALLY 🌟 ° ~ ` 🏍 Airow||🤍est^ .🐈‍⬛ 🤎Turn up to celebrate! Airow true le sserafim 📍 🔚 🔤rue Yunjin...—🤩acey! 🎁 . Rap line , madnae line 🪩 |🧪 🧸 @airow_cvg

custom 53481745463504069092custom 53482548751237418732custom 53481528868303318581custom 53482248404174415011

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @airow_cvg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,129,833 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐴𝑖𝑟𝑜𝑤!¡ 𑀝VᏵ🌹” (@airow_cvg), 8 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/airow_cvg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.