Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AI RANEZ

Channel

AI RANEZ

@airanez

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

5,139subscribers

+33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002440280800
TypeChannel
Username@airanez
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/airanez

Growth

5,1065,1395,122.57 August 2026 — 5,106 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,106 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,107 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,116 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,114 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,116 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,121 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,123 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,131 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,139 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 23 days, net +33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,101–5,144 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 08:195,139+8
27 Aug 2026, 16:235,131+8
24 Aug 2026, 07:475,123+2
20 Aug 2026, 16:135,121+5
17 Aug 2026, 11:275,116+2
13 Aug 2026, 18:155,114-2
11 Aug 2026, 00:055,116+9
7 Aug 2026, 23:055,107+1
7 Aug 2026, 15:315,106no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:195,106first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 11 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

469 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥16635.4%
👍15032.0%
🤯7014.9%
💯265.54%
👌153.20%
🙏153.20%
👀61.28%
👏61.28%
🕊51.07%
🏆30.64%
👻30.64%
🫡20.426%
🍾10.213%
👨‍💻10.213%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 469reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 18 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @airanez. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 June 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC≈2,000 views17 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Что не так с твоим Claude Code?! | Разбор от Anthropic СМОТРЕТЬ ВИДЕО Недавно инженер из Anthropic выложил очень ценную статью об изменениях в работе с моделями Claude 5 поколения Ссылка на статью В данном видео я подробно разобрал статью и применил эти знания на практике с помощью полезного скилла! Считаю, что всем необходимо прогнать данный скилл на своём Claude Code! Приятного просмотра! AI RANEZ

👍9🔥4💯3🤯1

28 Jul 2026, 17:47 UTC≈2,370 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Opus 5 > Fable 5 >>> GPT 5.6 Sol AI RANEZ

👍18🔥5💯4🤯3

24 Jul 2026, 17:57 UTC≈3,700 views22 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Opus 5 Надеюсь будет Гуд 🙏🏼 AI RANEZ

🔥8👍7🙏4💯3

24 Jul 2026, 12:24 UTC≈3,130 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Что произошло между OpenAI и HuggingFace?! OpenAI тестировала GPT‑5.6 Sol и, внимание, ещё более мощную модель, которая пока не выпущена в общий доступ. Тестировали их на ExploitGym - это бенчмарк, заточенный под кибербезопасность и всё, что с ней связано Так вот, модели работали внутри своего sandbox и каким-то образом предположили, что на Hugging Face могут храниться материалы этого бенчмарка и готовые решения. И

👌6🔥6👍3🤯2👏1

23 Jul 2026, 16:25 UTC≈2,610 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍8🔥4👌3🤯2

18 Jul 2026, 17:16 UTC≈4,040 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мельком протестировал Kimi K3, посмотрел в X, на что она способна Всё выглядит прикольно, красиво Не уверен, конечно, что она дотягивает до Fable 5, но, по ощущениям, всё ближе и ближе В целом, сплошные плюсы - конкуренция в AI - это отлично! Но у Kimi K3 есть одна проблема, а именно tokens/second Пока всё не очень: 15 tps, что, по факту, делает эту модель неюзабельной. В то время как у Fable - 38 tps, то есть о

🔥14👍2🤯2👌1💯1🙏1

15 Jul 2026, 16:49 UTC≈3,970 views48 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Fable 5 >>> GPT 5.6 Sol AI RANEZ

🔥22👍8💯8🤯5👀3🍾1👌1

9 Jul 2026, 18:40 UTC≈5,420 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Наконец-то вышла GPT-5.6! Пока только Sol у себя не вижу. У кого уже появилась? Как она показывает себя в ваших тестах? Я очень ждал эту модель - пойду доделывать задачи! AI RANEZ

🔥12👍5🙏3

30 Jun 2026, 18:03 UTC≈6,110 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Sonnet 5 вышел! Что ж, Fable до сих пор нет. Дают пока что Sonnet 5 Еще не пользовался в кодинге, но есть мысли что Sonnet 5 > Opus 4.8, как это было уже однажды с моделями постарее Кто уже протестировал - делитесь своим мнением в комментариях! Что лучше Sonnet 5 или Opus 4.8? AI RANEZ

🔥12👍7👏4💯1

26 Jun 2026, 17:22 UTC≈6,000 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026

GPT 5.6 Sol вышла Но есть одно НО - модель пока доступна очень ограниченному числу людей и непонятно кому именно AI RANEZ

🤯16🏆3🔥3👀2👌2

26 Jun 2026, 12:16 UTC≈5,500 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

AI зима?! Что ж, Fable так и не вернули, и непонятно, когда это произойдет и произойдет ли когда-то Но появились новые факты по выходу модели GPT-5.6 Американское правительство запретило компании OpenAI выкатывать данную модель для всех. Вместо этого данную модель GPT-5.6 получат только избранные люди американским правлением Честно говоря, это ужасные новости! Скорее всего, то же самое ждет Gemini 3.5, хотя не ф

🤯16👍4💯3👌1🔥1

24 Jun 2026, 14:51 UTC≈3,850 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Компания OpenAI разработала свой первый AI chip Этот чип создан специально для LLM Это хорошие новости. Надеюсь, данные чипы положительно скажутся на инференсе AI RANEZ

🔥13👍4🤯2👌1💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @airanez. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AI RANEZ” (@airanez), 5,139 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/airanez.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.