Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Семейные споры и защита активов | Никита Андрушкевич

Channel

Семейные споры и защита активов | Никита Андрушкевич

@aip_consulting

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

322subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001518246343
TypeChannel
Username@aip_consulting
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/aip_consulting

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

320325322.57 August 2026 — 325 subscribers8 August 2026 — 325 subscribers9 September 2026 — 324 subscribers17 September 2026 — 320 subscribers30 September 2026 — 322 subscribers3227 August 202630 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 54 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 319–326 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Sept 2026, 20:18322+2
17 Sept 2026, 04:20320-4
9 Sept 2026, 13:18324-1
8 Aug 2026, 07:19325no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:53325first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥866.7%
❤216.7%
👌18.33%
🤔18.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC20 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ВРЕДНЫЕ СОВЕТЫ ОТ СЕМЕЙНОГО ЮРИСТА 😈⚖️ Если хотите максимально усложнить себе развод, спор о детях или разделе имущества - вот несколько проверенных способов, показавших свою эффективность на практике 👇🏼 1. «Ничего не сохраняй, если придется - докажешь» Переписки? Удали. Чеки, переводы? Зачем хранить. Документы на квартиру? Где-то лежат. А потом в суде уверенно рассказывайте, как всё было на самом деле. Проблема тол…

❤1

5 Aug 2026, 20:28 UTC26 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📌#полезные_карточки_аип Всем доброй ночи! 💤 (Сохраняете вечерний пост, чтобы не забыть перечитать утром) Мы часто обсуждаем развод и споры о детях, но еще не говорили о том, какие ошибки, к сожалению, могут стать решающими в решении суда о порядке общения или места жительства детей. Итак, 5 ошибок, которые могут стоить родителю общения с ребенком после развода 👆🏼

4 Aug 2026, 19:11 UTC33 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🌍 Мировой закон: развод… по почте Звучит как шутка, но в некоторых штатах США супругам вовсе не обязательно лично приходить в суд, чтобы расторгнуть брак. Если супруги полностью согласны по всем вопросам - раздел имущества, дети, алименты - документы могут быть поданы дистанционно, а решение суда приходит без единого судебного заседания 😅 На первый взгляд кажется, что это очень удобно. Но есть и обратная сторона👇🏼 …

🔥4

31 Jul 2026, 17:54 UTC61 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Муж получил повестку, но решил просто не приходить в суд, рассчитывая таким образом затянуть развод. Пока он не явится на заседание, суд не сможет расторгнуть брак.

  1. Верю4%
  2. Не верю96%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jul 2026, 17:53 UTC57 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Муж подал иск о расторжении брака. Жена категорически против развода и на каждое заседание приходит с просьбой сохранить семью. Если один из супругов против, развестись можно только через суд.

  1. Верю95%
  2. Не верю5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jul 2026, 17:52 UTC56 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Если ребенку исполнилось 10 лет и он хочет жить с папой, суд обязан оставить его с папой.

  1. Верю44%
  2. Не верю56%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jul 2026, 17:50 UTC51 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚖️ Пятничная игра - «Верю & не верю» Сегодня проверим, насколько хорошо вы знаете семейное право. Правила простые: я публикую утверждение, а вы голосуете в опросе: ✅ Верю ❌ Не верю Не подглядывайте в интернет - давайте проверим именно интуицию 😉 P.S. После ответа на вопрос вы сразу увидите, какой ответ правильный 👌🏼

🔥2🤔1

29 Jul 2026, 19:19 UTC57 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пока наша команда готовит для вас новые кейсы, я решил не делать паузу и запустить по средам новую рубрику - #полезные_карточки_аип с важной информацией, которая может пригодиться каждому. Когда люди принимают решение о разводе, кажется, что самое сложное с юридической точки зрения - подать документы и дождаться решения суда. 📌На практике все оказывается гораздо сложнее. Есть вещи, о которых редко говорят заранее, н…

🔥2❤1👌1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @aip_consulting. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jul 2026, 17:54 UTCAnonymous Quiz23 voters

Муж получил повестку, но решил просто не приходить в суд, рассчитывая таким образом затянуть развод. Пока он не явится на заседание, суд не сможет расторгнуть брак.

  1. Верю4%
  2. Не верю96%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jul 2026, 17:53 UTCAnonymous Quiz20 voters

Муж подал иск о расторжении брака. Жена категорически против развода и на каждое заседание приходит с просьбой сохранить семью. Если один из супругов против, развестись можно только через суд.

  1. Верю95%
  2. Не верю5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jul 2026, 17:52 UTCAnonymous Quiz18 voters

Если ребенку исполнилось 10 лет и он хочет жить с папой, суд обязан оставить его с папой.

  1. Верю44%
  2. Не верю56%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Семейные споры и защита активов | Никита Андрушкевич” (@aip_consulting), 322 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aip_consulting.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.