Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 女神萌萌回归版🎉🎉🎉

Channel

女神萌萌回归版🎉🎉🎉

@ainimendimengbao

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

232subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004399968302
TypeChannel
Username@ainimendimengbao
Created19 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ainimendimengbao

Growth

227232229.511 Aug 2026, 22:32 — 227 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 22:45 — 227 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 22:04 — 232 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 22:3212 Aug 2026, 22:04
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 226–233 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:04232+5
11 Aug 2026, 22:45227no change
11 Aug 2026, 22:32227first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
455.6%
avg views ÷ 232 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,060
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.137%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held16 (19 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total13,742
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
29s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC88 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @YTBGZQ1

【老师艺名】:#萌萌 @nihaoluo 【出击时间】: 7月28日 【出击留名】:远山 @ejectIn3s 课后作业:(文采描述) 老师长休归来约了比较早的课,颜值个性化不千篇一律,依旧能打,身上的纹身不少但是自己操刀有和谐独特的美感,流程有些生疏反而造就了意外的女友体验感,畅聊环节也是感到是个有话聊有想法聊得来的妹妹,期待下一次的红裙和酒了。 https://t.me/HZYT88

10 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC257 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

来吧来吧,12日开启预定,目前12日一个位,后面都可定了

7 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC695 viewsread 11 August 2026

秋天的第一杯奶茶怕喝了睡不着,我只想知道谁会是我秋天的第一个男人🥹

4 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC903 viewsread 11 August 2026

红休🙂‍↔️非常抱歉宝子们,定了的找我退订哈

4 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC902 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @hhjxreport

【沪杭精选报告】: https://t.me/hhlsml 【艺名】:萌萌 【价格】:1280P 【位置】:上城区 【联系方式】:@nihaoluo 【身材样貌】:人照一致,165,胸B,黄皮3-4号色。多处纹身:脖颈处,满背,胸前(正在洗),左右臂等 【服务过程】:堵车+走错单元,这次约课虽迟但到,萌萌一点儿脾气或者不耐烦都没有,交水费洗澡来到战场。躺在提前铺好的床单上,先侧躺抱着萌萌来一个大蟒蛇,边舌吻边翻身让萌萌躺下,准备来套J式反项服务。先进攻胸部,对着一边乳头吸、舔、含、吹的同时手握着另一个乳房抓、揉、捏、推,紧接着两手握住两个奶子往中间怼,怼到一嘴能含住两个乳头的位置,而后拼命的用舌头来回舔两个乳头,完事之后舌漫游走从乳房舔到小腹,再到三角地带。此时不着急舔阴蒂,而是绕着整个三角区轻轻的哈气,然后用舌头撩拨近小阴唇位置(不舔到阴道口),这样两三圈之后,开始进攻阴蒂。先是上下吮舔,慢慢的幅度变大,把阴道口的区域也囊括

2 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 11 August 2026

沪杭两地精选群,吃好菜认准91公馆,不定时半价,白嫖 https://t.me/jiuyigongguann

31 Jul 2026, 05:28 UTC≈1,470 viewsread 11 August 2026

半岛嫩妹会报告模板: https://telegram.me/hangzhoubandao 【优势】漂亮嫩,性格好,口活很爽 【不足】没有不足 【妹子花名】:萌萌 【联系方式】:@nihaoluo 【妹子年龄】:19 【验证留名】:@djb18018 【验证时间】:7月30日 【大概位置】:七堡 【修车水费】:1280p 【高端服务】:有的打✅ ① 舌吻 ② 69舔逼 ✔️ ③ 情绪价值 ✔️ ④ 毒龙 【人照相似】:人照相似程度9分 【身高身材】:身高腿长,纹身有点多 【凶器罩杯】:b胸,乳头粉嫩,整体手感舒服 【湿度紧度】:比比粉嫩,又湿又紧,周围毛量正常 【环境细节】:出入方便房间整洁 【个人卫生】:有抽烟,有漱口水牙刷/浴巾,事前事后有清洗 【时间管理】:开课准时,排课宽松,课时做完 【服务点评】:服务到位,无少做,过程无机车 【推荐程度】:✅ 差评 中评 中好评 好评 超级好评

31 Jul 2026, 03:04 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @teamjay3333Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

24 Jul 2026, 01:57 UTC≈1,510 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🌷𝓢⃨𝓾⃨𝓷⃨𝓭⃨𝓪⃨𝔂⃨ ~⑅♪🌿 “今日不追赶时间 ·只奔赴快乐 〰️🫶🏻”

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ainimendimengbao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,213,384 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“女神萌萌回归版🎉🎉🎉” (@ainimendimengbao), 232 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ainimendimengbao.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.