Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -99. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,353–4,482 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 21:18
4,368
-18
14 Sept 2026, 20:59
4,386
-9
11 Sept 2026, 08:57
4,395
-9
6 Sept 2026, 03:38
4,404
-5
2 Sept 2026, 08:32
4,409
-6
30 Aug 2026, 00:16
4,415
-8
26 Aug 2026, 17:48
4,423
-3
23 Aug 2026, 23:09
4,426
-13
20 Aug 2026, 01:57
4,439
-6
16 Aug 2026, 15:52
4,445
-3
13 Aug 2026, 09:56
4,448
-8
10 Aug 2026, 02:25
4,456
-9
6 Aug 2026, 23:14
4,465
-2
6 Aug 2026, 20:31
4,467
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
16m 39s
Average length
16m 39s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
378 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
210
55.6%
🔥
92
24.3%
👍
76
20.1%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 378 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Когда вы говорите "у меня нет времени", что это обычно значит?
Мне не хочется этим заниматься47%
Я боюсь провала9%
Я не вижу в этом смысла18%
Я устал(а)34%
У меня другие приоритеты40%
The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Ваши любимые странности в кино
Какие?
Все уже давно обсудили бесконечно стреляющие пистолеты, водителей, которые смотрят не на дорогу, а на пассажира. И всех, кто в не знакомых домах ночью зачем-то лезет в подвал, из которого раздаются странные звуки. Но есть же и менее очевидные киношные странности.
Меня все время цепляют:
👻Детские комнаты в американских домах, законсервированные на годы после того, как ребеночек…
Кого предпринимателю нанимать первым: ассистента или специалиста?
Игорь — адвокат, работает в верхнем ценовом сегменте с юридическими лицами. Он ведёт дела разного масштаба: от относительно простых до многолетних и дорогих, и при этом сам закрывает почти всё — от переписки и документов до контроля сроков и мелких организационных задач.
Работы много, времени не хватает, и он понимает, что без помощника дальше так ра…
В одном из круизов я познакомилась с гитаристом Дмитрием Малолетовым.
Его выступления всегда собирали столько людей, что не хватало стульев, и мы стояли. Он не только играл, для меня любимой частью его мини-концертов были истории. Дмитрий работал с артистами, которых знают все: Газманов, Николаев, Королева, Пугачева, Аллегрова.
Среди всех историй, что он рассказывал нам, моя любимая – эта:
Дмитрий получает работу у…
Что вы отказываетесь покупать в более дешевой версии?
Даже если разница не так уж принципиальна.
Даже если вам есть, на что потратить эти деньги.
То есть мы не про ортопедические подушки, с которыми результат прямо заметен.
У меня из «дурацкого» – бумажная продукция Yokosun.
Конкретно, простите, туалетная бумага.
Ну нравится она мне, хотя казалось бы – это ж такая ерунда.
Еще я покупаю красивые картонные карточки…
Открыта регистрация на мастер-класс Галины Иевлевой «Nail it: Как не масштабировать бардак» - 11 августа в 18:00 Мск.
«Nail it Как не масштабировать бардак» – для предпринимателей и экспертов, которые пока зарабатывают меньше, чем хотели бы. И хотят расти.
«Nail it before you scale it» – главная заповедь для роста в бизнесе.
Попытки расти, когда вы или ваш проект к этому не готовы, приводят к хаосу, увеличению ва…
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Лет 10 назад я спорила (спойлер: зря) с одним умным человеком. Мне, вообще, свойственно спорить там, где я не разбираюсь. Потому что чем меньше понимаешь в теме, тем крепче же уверен, что все знаешь, да?
Предметом спора был выбор благотворительного проекта: была хорошая сумма денег, и нужно было выбрать – кому ее отдать. Обычному детскому дому или сообществу семей с приемными детьми, у которых все и без нас было неп…
А я пока начну потихонечку свой 48-ой годик жизни.
❤28👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @aimachievementstudio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Когда вы говорите "у меня нет времени", что это обычно значит?
Мне не хочется этим заниматься47%
Я боюсь провала9%
Я не вижу в этом смысла18%
Я устал(а)34%
У меня другие приоритеты40%
The shares total 148%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Юлия_Рублева @zamuzh_rubleva · 20,389 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 September 2026
Лиля Ким | Сторителлинг и блог @lilia_kim_story · 23,295 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Галина Иевлева. Мастерская Достижения Целей” (@aimachievementstudio), 4,368 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aimachievementstudio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.