Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

لقـاء الروح ..💙!

@aillme_different

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,975subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001255881513
TypeChannel
Username@aillme_different
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aillme_different

Growth

7,9758,0017,9886 August 2026 — 8,001 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,001 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,994 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,980 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,975 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,971–8,005 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:357,975-5
10 Aug 2026, 05:367,980-14
7 Aug 2026, 05:507,994-7
6 Aug 2026, 09:208,001no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:198,001first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.12%
avg views ÷ 7,975 subscribers
Avg views / post
488
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held34 (13 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total14,642
Reactions total244
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
57s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

277 reactions across 34 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20975.5%
👍3311.9%
💔145.05%
💯93.25%
❤‍🔥41.44%
🙏31.08%
😢20.722%
👏10.361%
🔥10.361%
🤔10.361%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 277reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 02:28 UTC81 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

. ‏من آداب الفراق ، دَفْنُ الأسْرار ..🤍

👍1

11 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC110 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ahbbtuhaVideo

سيرسله الله عطوفاً نبيلاً لا لوم منه ولا عتب ، لا جرح منه ولا كذب، يحبّكِ هوناً وللشدائد عوناً، مهتدياً بكِ ودونكِ هو من الضالين.. ستجدين به ما يسرّك، يطيّب خاطركِ ويهبكِ كل جميل 😊❤️.

7

11 Aug 2026, 00:40 UTC191 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

. إن غصة واحدة في مجرى حلقي لا يمكن أن تشفيها كل أنهار الكون 💔.

💔4💯2

11 Aug 2026, 00:36 UTC190 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

يا صاحبي لم تكن القضية يوماً قضية وجوه وإنما قضية قلوب الوسامة الحقيقية في الروح هذا الدفء في المعاملة الحنان في التعاطي اللين في الكلام لم تكن القضية يوماً في الجيوب وإنما في القلوب أيضاً الثراء الحقيقي في الروح هذا الإيمان الراسخ رسوخ الجبال فلا تهزه حوادث الليالي وهذا اليقين الشامخ الذي لا تُركعه تقلبات الأيام ❤️.

5

11 Aug 2026, 00:35 UTC177 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

إِذَا لَمْ يَكُنْ لَنَا نَصِيبٌ .. فَلِمَاذَا جَمَعَتْنَا الصُّدْفَ ؟ وَلماذا جَعَلَتْنِي أَعْتَقِدُ أَنَّ بَعْضَ اللِّقَاءِ لَا يَأْتِي عَبَثًا ؟

💔4😢2

8 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC320 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

التوكل قوّة؛ ولو جُمعت للمرء أشكال المواساة وألوانها فلن يجد شيئًا يمسح على قلبه ويقوّي أركان طمأنينته مثل تفويض أمره لله واستشعاره أنه في ظلال معيّة الله وأن الله كافيه أمره .🤍

💯7

8 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC313 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

‏"إلهي، عُد بي إلى المرة الأولى التي كان عليَّ فيها الاختيار، وأنا أعرف الصواب."

3🙏3

8 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC314 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

. أن تكون بين الجميع وغارق في أمرٍ ما ❤️.

6

8 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC322 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

‏"للمرة الأولى أستشعر المعنى الحقيقي لِ : رَبَّنَا افرِغ عَلينَا صَبرًا لن تكفيك جرعة أو مكيالٍ من صبر أنت في أمس الحاجة إلى شلال فوق رأسك يغسل آلامك ويشد عزمك صبر يصمد أمام كيد الظالمين وفراق الأحبة وصعوبة الطريق وإغراءات الفتن ووسوسة النفوس يا رب : رَبَّنَا افرِغ عَلينَا صَبرًا " ❤️🍃.

5

8 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC309 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

وإن غاب نِصفك ، إحذر أن تُكمل فراغَك بالعابرين ❤️👌🏻

👍5

8 Aug 2026, 01:37 UTC318 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ahbbtuha

نفرُّ إليك منَّـا فاعفُ عنا ‏فنحن الناقصون إلى كمالِك 🤍 ‏وتخجِلُنا المعاصي حين ندعو ‏وتطمعُنا صفاتُك في سؤالِك 🤍

5

8 Aug 2026, 00:28 UTC348 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

يا لَيْتَني أحظَى بِوَصْلِكِ ساعَةً لِأبُثَّ ما في خاطِري فَأقولُ! 🥺❤️.

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @aillme_different. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 229,889 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“لقـاء الروح ..💙!” (@aillme_different), 7,975 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aillme_different.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.