Channel
@aiintelligence_go
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
421subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003613193461 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aiintelligence_go |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aiintelligence_go |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:29 | 421 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 417 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,724 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 80.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🗂 今日日报 ⏰ 08/14 21:40 - 08/15 21:40 ━━━━━━━━━━ 🧭 今日动态 🔹 群内关于“串子”身份的激烈争论 群内针对近期频繁出现的“串子”身份展开了激烈讨论。多位群友认为该“串子”疑似某位活跃群友的小号，并列举了打字习惯、共同群组重合度等证据。双方在群内发生言语冲突，甚至涉及人身攻击。目前该争议仍在持续，部分群友呼吁理性讨论，不要被情绪左右。 🔹 长沙地区嫖客出击频率与市场现状讨论 群友们讨论了长沙地区近期嫖客减少的现象，认为这可能是全国范围内的趋势。同时，针对部分老师涨价、服务缩水（如取消蛇吻等）的行为，群友们表达了强烈不满，建议大家多去口碑好的老师处，抵制随意涨价和态度恶劣的行为。 ━━━━━━━━━━ 🎯 今日老师 🔸 泡芙 今日群内讨论度较高的老师之一。根据群友反馈，泡芙目前位于岳麓区，价格为500P/900PP。有群友分享了探店体验，表示该老师颜值尚可，但服务态度一般，存…
🗂 今日日报 ⏰ 08/13 21:40 - 08/14 21:40 ━━━━━━━━━━ 🧭 今日动态 🔹 空气别频道粉丝数激增引发讨论 空气别频道粉丝数在短时间内出现异常增长，从5.7k迅速攀升至7.5k，引发群内关于“刷粉”与“做大做强”的讨论。部分用户对此表示欣慰，也有用户调侃其为“传奇诞生”，并讨论了频道运营中的收益与被举报风险。群内成员对该频道的粉丝恢复速度表示惊讶，并戏称其为“空气鸡业”。 🔹 群内关于“牢俏”直播事件的争议 群内讨论了一起关于“牢俏”直播双飞过程中，有用户因开摄像头被录屏并流出的事件。该事件引发了关于隐私保护与直播风险的广泛讨论。部分用户对男主的行为表示不解，认为其在直播中暴露隐私属于“社死”行为，同时对直播内容的真实性与画质进行了吐槽，认为其直播风格较为粗糙且存在法律风险。 🔹 群内关于“串子”与“老鼠人”的争论 群内爆发了关于“串子”行为的激烈争论。有用户指责他人利用小号在大群中进行…
🗂 今日日报 ⏰ 08/11 21:40 - 08/12 21:40 ━━━━━━━━━━ 🧭 今日动态 🔹 武汉学生约课被打事件引发热议 群内分享了一起武汉学生在研习社约课被打的事件。学生投稿称，约课老师“懒懒”服务敷衍且课表不符，要求退钱时被两名持电击棒的大汉殴打，且600元费用未退。该事件引发了群内关于PC安全、防身手段（如防狼喷雾、隐蔽摄像头）以及遇到仙人跳如何处理的激烈讨论。多位用户提醒大家注意安全，并对该老师的行为表示强烈谴责。 🔹 群内关于PC安全与防骗的经验交流 针对群内频繁出现的骗局（如保证金、定金、返现、跑分等），多位用户分享了被骗经历，提醒新手保持冷静。有用户提到在电报上搜城市名容易遇到骗子，并建议不要轻易转账。同时，群内讨论了如何识别假冒老师（如假冒香奈儿柜姐等）以及在遇到突发情况时的应对策略，强调了“不贪便宜、不轻易转账”的重要性。 ━━━━━━━━━━ 🎯 今日老师 🔸 小白菜 今日群内…
🗂 今日日报 ⏰ 08/10 21:40 - 08/11 21:40 ━━━━━━━━━━ 🧭 今日动态 🔹 群友总结嫖娼防坑指南与安全建议 群内资深玩家总结了一份详尽的防坑指南，核心要点包括：选择正规榜单老师，拒绝广告群盲盒；出击携带现金，避免转账留痕；注意个人卫生，自带拖鞋防脚气；切勿与代聊产生情感纠葛，保持纯粹交易关系；遇到差评报告务必重视，切勿盲目相信好评；若遇突发检查，保持冷静，一问三不知。该指南被群友誉为精髓，建议收藏。 🔹 长沙地区近期严查与出击风险提示 近期长沙及周边地区（如益阳）查处力度加大，群友普遍反映出击风险上升。有群友提到物业在公寓楼进行防火宣传，实际上门敲门核查，导致出击过程心惊胆战。群内呼吁大家近期减少出击频率，保持低调，尤其是不要去高风险地区，安全第一。 ━━━━━━━━━━ 🎯 今日老师 🔸 叶璃 近期讨论度极高的老师，人气火爆，预约非常困难。据群友反馈，甚至提前一天预约都排到了次日…
🗂 今日日报 ⏰ 08/09 21:40 - 08/10 21:40 ━━━━━━━━━━ 🧭 今日动态 🔹 长沙地区扫黄风声趋紧，多处SPA店被查封 群内多位用户反馈长沙地区近期扫黄力度加大，玉兰路等多处SPA店被突击检查甚至水泥封门，部分用户表示近期减少了出击频率，建议避开风头。 🔹 群友分享社交软件约会与情感交流经验 群内用户深入讨论了通过Soul、小红书等社交软件结识女性的技巧，包括如何识别对方人品、如何处理拒绝以及对婚恋观的看法。部分用户分享了在夜场或通过社交软件结识女性的经历，并探讨了关于彩礼、结婚目的及代孕等敏感社会话题。 ━━━━━━━━━━ 🎯 今日老师 🔸 诗琪 群内讨论显示诗琪目前处于难以预约的状态，有用户提到她已经很久没有开课，关于其是否还能约到存在不确定性。 🔸 奶娃 有用户询问关于奶娃的评价，群内反馈称该老师已存在较长时间，目前没有特别的评价，认为没必要进行评价。 🔸 雯雯 有用户询…
🗂 今日日报 ⏰ 08/08 21:40 - 08/09 21:40 ━━━━━━━━━━ 🧭 今日动态 🔹 长沙严打风声再起，多地炮楼受影响 群内多位用户反馈长沙近期严打力度加大，特别是针对舞厅、私人影院及部分公寓式炮楼的突击检查频繁。有用户提到玉兰路已被封锁，且凌晨时段有执法行动。建议各位狼友近期减少出击频率，避开高风险区域，尤其是对于线上付款记录需保持警惕，尽量避免留下敏感痕迹。 🔹 网红“糯糯”事件引发群内热议 群内针对网红“糯糯”的近期行为展开了激烈讨论，涉及其社交账号曝光、整容及高额消费争议。部分用户对其外貌和行为表示反感，甚至将其与“河童”等负面标签挂钩。同时，关于其是否涉及精神药物滥用及与富哥之间的金钱纠纷也成为讨论焦点，群内提醒此类争议人物需谨慎对待，避免卷入不必要的麻烦。 ━━━━━━━━━━ 🎯 今日老师 🔸 籽鱼 籽鱼近期在群内讨论中被多位用户强烈推荐，评价其为“温柔、爱笑、配合度高”的嫩妹…
# 籽鱼 账号：@a172465 价格/性价比：不错 一、硬件 颜值：人照9分 视觉估龄：18 身高/坦度：160，微微胖 肤色/质感：白 纹身：有少量纹身 身材 胸：B 腰：正常 腿：正常 臀：正常 逼：红 二、软件 服务内容：没69大蟒蛇 做爱感受：我是早几天去的，见面一看就知道刚做这行，人照基本一直，皮肤白，有点婴儿肥，有些害羞，有问必答，我看到这么乖就直接交了费。交完钱抱着蛇吻，特别配合，我是吻了几分钟再去洗澡。之后来到床上口，不喊停就一直口，指挥妹妹舔也很配合，乳头和下面很敏感，亲妹妹时下面有点湿了，于是赶紧带套进入。做的时候妹妹也很上头，换了两个姿势出水了。 环境与设施：干净，两张床。 三、综述 缺点：口活一般 特色：敏感，乖巧，害羞
🗂 今日日报 ⏰ 08/07 21:40 - 08/08 21:40 ━━━━━━━━━━ 🧭 今日动态 🔹 长沙舞厅扫黄风声紧，多地被查 群内多名用户反馈长沙近期扫黄打非力度加大，昨晚不少砂砂舞厅被端。有用户担忧纯爱战神等常客可能已被带走，并提醒大家近期不要去炮楼，以免增加风险。用户建议出击时尽量使用现金，并保持防范意识，不要在大群内频繁讨论约课细节。 🔹 群内关于“鸡头”与“权限狗”的争议 群内爆发了关于鸡头管理风格的激烈讨论，部分用户对某些群主或鸡头随意封禁、删帖及威胁开盒的行为表示不满，称其为“权限狗”。讨论中涉及了“车小白”等人物，有用户计划晚上挂人以示抗议。同时，群内对于是否应该与鸡头讲道理展开了辩论，多数老手认为与鸡头讲道理是徒劳的，应保持冷静并及时止损。 🔹 群内积分排行与抽奖活动动态 群内持续进行积分排行统计，白小飞、chenbewin等用户位居积分榜前列。群管理发布了“南朝市场第七周常规抽奖活动”，…
开发了一个用于创建双向机器人的助手 @NoraSupport_bot
🤖AI情报站🤖 pinned a photo
🗂 今日日报 ⏰ 08/05 21:40 - 08/06 21:40 ━━━━━━━━━━ 🧭 今日动态 🔹 长沙舞厅现状与组团探店讨论 群内针对长沙舞厅（如M舞厅、美琪等）的现状进行了深入讨论。用户指出M舞厅撤掉了舞池帘子，私密性下降，建议开卡座。关于舞厅尺度，用户认为主要看妹子个人，存在开发空间。群内成员提议组团探店，但因时间协调及部分成员自称阳痿、工作忙等原因，组团计划进展缓慢。此外，有用户分享了舞厅的消费水平及预约技巧，提醒新手注意防范加钟陷阱。 🔹 关于长沙市场行情与出击心态的交流 群友交流了长沙目前的市场行情，普遍认为妹子质量较去年有所下降，且存在涨价现象。讨论中涉及了对“嫩妹”与“老嫂子”的定义，以及对鸡头群营销手段的质疑。部分用户表达了对出击成本（如600元/钟）的肉疼感，并分享了通过打飞机等方式进行“祛魅”的心态调整。同时，针对如何与良家妇女聊天、如何拓宽社交渠道等话题进行了探讨，强调了自信与不要脸精神…
头课预约机器人： @AI8848_bot 私信请联系： @maipian_88_bot
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aiintelligence_go. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 161,694 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🤖AI情报站🤖” (@aiintelligence_go), 421 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aiintelligence_go.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.