Канал Александра Кузнецова о коммуникациях, агентском бизнесе и AI.
🦖 Интернет-динозавр с 1996 года.
🤖 Кейсы, инсайты, тренды и личный опыт от человека, который в интернете дольше, чем Google.
https://rationalis.life
Created
Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 96 days, net +4,466. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,502–10,422 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 14:48
9,731
-8
6 Nov 2026, 21:08
9,739
+200
4 Nov 2026, 07:29
9,539
+168
1 Nov 2026, 00:37
9,371
+467
28 Oct 2026, 15:37
8,904
+89
25 Oct 2026, 19:28
8,815
+803
22 Oct 2026, 18:08
8,012
+715
19 Oct 2026, 09:56
7,297
+115
16 Oct 2026, 03:18
7,182
+309
12 Oct 2026, 19:10
6,873
+392
5 Oct 2026, 23:41
6,481
+499
28 Sept 2026, 12:37
5,982
+513
19 Sept 2026, 04:18
5,469
+122
14 Sept 2026, 10:17
5,347
+2
10 Sept 2026, 12:36
5,345
+160
5 Sept 2026, 17:59
5,185
-16
1 Sept 2026, 11:48
5,201
-15
29 Aug 2026, 01:05
5,216
-8
26 Aug 2026, 03:36
5,224
+39
22 Aug 2026, 23:56
5,185
first reading
Engagement
141 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.65%
avg views ÷ 9,731 subscribers
Avg views / post
355
105 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
106
of 141 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 104 of 105 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
141 (30 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
37,284
Reactions total
1,022
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 11:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,590
Videos
≈613
Links
≈1,470
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
15m 28s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,191 reactions across 138 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 9.07% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
108
9.07%
🔥
74
6.21%
😁
52
4.37%
👍
51
4.28%
👌
49
4.11%
😇
45
3.78%
🙏
45
3.78%
🤣
41
3.44%
🤪
39
3.27%
❤🔥
38
3.19%
🙈
38
3.19%
🥰
37
3.11%
🫡
37
3.11%
🤯
36
3.02%
👏
35
2.94%
🤩
35
2.94%
🌚
34
2.85%
🤔
32
2.69%
🎉
31
2.60%
😍
31
2.60%
19 further kinds
303
25.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 138 of the 141 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,191 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 140 we hold a reading for · 0.7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aigency360. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 141 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 106 posts held from the last 30 days (0.943%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Львы на месте, а ваше сердечко уже пошаливает :)
В пятницу по сети разошёлся слух: из Akron Zoo в США сбежали африканские львы. Пришлось зоопарку публично ответить: звери в вольере, фото льва на улицах Акрона сгенерировано ИИ. Сам лев о своей прогулке так и не узнал.
В среду в зоопарке были плановые учения с полицией и пожарными. Со стороны вполне могло показаться, что случилась беда. Для аккредитации нужно проводи…
Рестораны Нью-Йорка жалуются на ИИ-агентов гостей. Чат-боты подбирают столик по освещению, строчат длинные жалобы и помогают выбивать возврат денег. Если надо, давят на жалость. До винной карты тоже добрались: совладелец манхэттенского бистро Jean's Ашвин Дешмух говорит, что гости часто выбирают вино через Claude и ChatGPT. У сомелье работы не остается - только если нет личного обаяния. Скоро в вакансиях напишут треб…
Remote Labor Index: Fable 5.2 против фрилансеров с Upwork
Fable 5.2 сдала 41,3% реальных заказов с качеством, которое устроило клиента. Вдвое больше, чем у Opus 5.5 и GPT 6 Astra. Правда, с промышленным дизайном и анимацией пока беда: на выходе битые исходники.
Аниматоры, у вас ещё пара версий форы :)
ИИ что дальше? Подпишись, да пребудут с тобой токены!
Atlas от Boston Dynamics встал на колёса.
Десять лет учили робота ходить. Чтобы в итоге он поехал :) Ну и прямо интересный компромисс между человекоподобностью и специальными роботами.
ИИ что дальше? Подпишись, да пребудут с тобой токены!
ChatGPT попросили реализовать игру на тему нового вида спорта - "шахбокса".
Посмотрел бы на такой поединок в реальности :)
ИИ что дальше? Подпишись, да пребудут с тобой токены!
«Последние герои боевиков» в исполнении ИИ.
Признавайтесь, сколько ностальгических фильмов узнали?
ИИ что дальше? Подпишись, да пребудут с тобой токены!
«Варвар с Пятой авеню»: Конан одолел всех колдунов, но с Эпштейном совладать не смог (или не смогла).
Вообще довольно интересно наблюдать за тем, как нейрослоп отражает страхи и ценности других стран. Показательно!
ИИ что дальше? Подпишись, да пребудут с тобой токены!
Контекстное окно любят хвастаться в презентациях: было 128 тысяч токенов, стал миллион. Оно же в тарифах, сравнениях моделей и в чате, где бот к сотому сообщению уже забыл твоё имя.
Пример: «Кидай ему весь репозиторий, у него окно на миллион, разберётся».
Мелкий шрифт: влезло ещё не значит, что прочитано. Середину длинного документа модели помнят хуже, чем начало и конец. Как студент методичку в ночь перед экзамено…
Выяснилось: чем хуже робот видит, тем смелее берётся за дело
Robocurve прогнала пять ИИ-моделей через 900 испытаний на двухруком роботе. Моделям давали различные небезопасные задания и меняли картинку с камеры. Кто попытался взяться за задачу, не обращая внимания на проблемы с картинок, отмечала Claude Fable 5.1.
С полноценной картинкой с камеры модели брались за задание всего в 81 случае из 300., то есть опасность…
👌1🦄1
Showing the 12 most recent of 141 posts we hold for @aigency360. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 11 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Три заголовка мы придумали, один написала жизнь. Угадаешь, какой достался нам без работы?
Чат-бот Госуслуг ответил жителю Твери на вопрос о паспорте рецептом борща на 12 порций20%
Умный холодильник Samsung в Казани запер дверцу, решив, что хозяин на диете с 22:0012%
ИИ-ассистент Microsoft Teams сам отменил 40 совещаний, сочтя их «бессмысленными для всех»24%
ИИ «Яндекса» внутри Max посоветовал Telegram и WhatsApp, а для Max — завести отдельный телефон44%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ИИ что дальше?” (@aigency360), 9,731 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aigency360.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.