Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

AiFun Channel

@aifun_report

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

4,950subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002276810420
TypeChannel
Username@aifun_report
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aifun_report

Growth

4,9504,9814,965.56 August 2026 — 4,981 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,977 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,963 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,950 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,945–4,986 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:274,950-13
10 Aug 2026, 06:504,963-14
6 Aug 2026, 20:574,977-4
6 Aug 2026, 04:324,981first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 12 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,501 reactions across 10 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💩2,12585.0%
👏1014.04%
👍933.72%
682.72%
custom 6140694423048030133281.12%
custom 6249305049223137105180.72%
🔥150.6%
custom 6271736688452568884130.52%
custom 623299017356764969290.36%
custom 613889035210011604270.28%
custom 625129579662960505760.24%
custom 614074590252604021740.16%
custom 630055553675664017440.16%
🥰40.16%
custom 614098249509450713930.12%
custom 614121732672638337630.12%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,501reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2025 to 16 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aifun_report. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2025 to 16 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2025, 19:25 UTC≈31,400 views561 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

Yxvm 与 ISIF 详细实名信息将于近日公布

💩458👍42custom 624930504922313710518🔥8custom 613889035210011604276👏6custom 62717366884525688845

16 Jul 2025, 19:25 UTC≈30,700 views384 reactionsread 12 August 2026

我们希望陈总做好准备,目前的攻击仅仅只作为开头,后续我们将增大力度,并将攻击由海外转向国内,攻击力量将会翻倍 🤡

💩333👏3810🔥3

16 Jul 2025, 19:21 UTC≈22,900 views157 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @cvpnVITASPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

💩131👍148custom 61406944230480301334

16 Jul 2025, 19:20 UTC≈29,800 views499 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Aifun VPN 将暂时停止服务,改为整顿国内 IDC 市场,将在整顿完成后进行双倍补偿

💩443👏19👍9custom 62717366884525688848custom 62512957966296050576custom 61406944230480301335custom 62329901735676496925🥰4

16 Jul 2025, 19:19 UTC≈17,700 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @cvpnVITASFile

File, posted without a caption

💩412👍1

16 Jul 2025, 19:18 UTC≈15,200 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @cvpnVITAS

绍兴仙人谢凯江 常州艾米信息科技有限公司 (https://aiqicha.baidu.com/company_comment_29012779243725) 注册资本:1000万元 统一社会信用代码:91320400MA20LQF79L 法定代表人:王晓琪(同时任职常州大江网络工程有限公司) 股东:陈嘉昊(奶昔VPN老板、常州大江网络工程有限公司法定代表人) 股东:谢凯江 同时任职浙江橙汁科技有限公司,违法所得222590.60元 名下绍兴凯立网络有限公司与浙江橙汁发生账务往来116437.66元 花卷科技老板陈伟在其名下广东迷之科技有限公司、杭州神喵科技有限公司任职监事

💩47custom 614069442304803013343👍3

16 Jul 2025, 19:18 UTC≈13,400 views79 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @tougao789Photo

来自匿名投稿 👨‍🏫 奶昔机场最新最快最好用的VPN,无视攻击无视屏蔽。发财致富的选择! VPN大师江苏常州人陈嘉昊博士320404199001044455打造的超级VPN联合体 ✅经常翻墙的朋友都知道,陈嘉昊(网名佩奇、peggy)伙同陈伟开设火极一时又低调转做企业服务的rixcloud和唯云四杰机场(Nexitally、Amytelecom、Immtelecom、库落米)等累计用户10万+的顶流机场🎓 ✅常州大江网络工程有限公司(法定代表人:陈嘉昊)斥资千万投资翻墙IDC公司浙江橙汁科技有限公司及背后的上海花卷科技、杭州包子信息、JINX ✅联合上市公司唯一网络-南兴股份(002757)打造唯云四杰翻墙联盟 ✅花卷科技与腾讯云进行深度战略合作,助力奶昔机场为十万用户实名接入AIA公网加速 ✅为王思聪和其普思资本提供专线服务累计7150071元,普惠造福千万网民不用千元就可以和大冤种王总挤一条大小包专线上网,倍儿有面子! ✅

💩5126👍2

16 Jul 2025, 19:18 UTC≈10,400 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @tougao789

匿名投稿 上海花卷陈总,通过【薯条】、【奶昔】VPN分成谋取暴利,于2025年购入房产: 浙江省杭州市萧山区宁围街道翡翠江南华庭5幢1单元902室 *** 157.82平。价值720W 目前陈总和秘书住在这里。准确消息,花卷陈伟睡过ucloud销售钟璐,哈哈

💩527custom 61406944230480301332

13 Jul 2025, 23:17 UTC≈13,700 views379 reactionsread 12 August 2026

我们将暂时关闭注册赠送体验套餐,开放日期待定

💩313👏38👍12custom 614069442304803013310🔥42

12 Jul 2025, 15:20 UTC≈15,700 views280 reactionsread 12 August 2026

订阅域名已更换,旧地址已失效,请尽快登陆官网获取新地址

💩256👍104custom 63005555367566401744custom 61406944230480301333custom 61409824950945071393

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @aifun_report. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 356,664 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AiFun Channel” (@aifun_report), 4,950 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aifun_report.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.