Channel
@aifatality
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
459subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002365752553 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aifatality |
| Description | Канал про нейро-хуейро, ии-шмуи и вот эту вот всю цифровую матрицу или как ускорить себя в десятки раз используя современные технологии на 100% |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aifatality |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 459 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:39 | 459 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 8 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
382 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 135 | 35.3% | |
| 👍 | 107 | 28.0% | |
| 😁 | 74 | 19.4% | |
| ❤ | 27 | 7.07% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 2.88% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 2.36% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 2.36% | |
| 🤗 | 4 | 1.05% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.785% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.262% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.262% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.262% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 382reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 November 2025 to 6 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 Запись эфира-перезентации закрытого сообщества "ИИ Первопроходцы" Смотреть запись в ВК Видео - https://vkvideo.ru/video-231365409_456239019 здесь в тг 👆 Попасть в сообщество можно только до 15 января (10 дней). После этого двери закрываются минимум до марта. Для кого это Для всех. Серьёзно. Маркетологи, копирайтеры, юристы, предприниматели, студенты, мамы в декрете, те кто вообще не понимает с какой стороны п…
👍4❤3
Важное сообщение про дальнейшее будущее данного канала! ----- Если можешь, смотри видео 👆 Если не можешь, читай текстом 👇 Каждый из вас знает меня по-своему. Кто-то пришёл ко мне как к маркетологу — и мы вместе строили воронки, запуски, системы. Кто-то знает меня как инвестора — и мы разбирались в деньгах, активах, долгосрочных стратегиях. Кто-то пришёл через психологию — и мы копали глубже, в мышление, в паттерны…
👍3
Собрал всё, что нужно знать про Claude AI из России, в один документ. Максимально рабочая методика с актуальными ценами на ноябрь 2025. Внутри — пошаговая инструкция от выбора страны до оплаты подписки, разбор закона о штрафах (что реально грозит, а что нет), настройка ePN с выбором правильного BIN, и список фатальных ошибок, из-за которых банят аккаунты. Забирайте — пригодится.
🔥27🙏11❤1
Ну по-крайней мере он это признает... Завтра днем все вам расскажу про дальнейшее. Спасибо за вашу активность без этого нет дофамина, только ваши просмотры, реакции и репосты питают меня, как солнцечный свет питает фикус на полу.
👍27🔥12❤6😁1
Ну а пока вы голосуете, вот вам новость. ГигаЧат сбера 3, это оказывается полностью с нуля обученная модель. Это…это удивительно и мощно. Возможно настанет скоро день, когда я скажу «Теперь это - можно использовать с проком». Посмотрим. Потестим.
🔥11👍7❤2
Помните я обещал вам большие новости в скором времени?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😁8👍3🔥3
Спасибо жопки, люблю вас всех, жму руку, обнимаю, отправил реакции психологу, сказала вылечит )) В ближайшие дни тут будет очень важная новость (не запуск и не продажа), но очень важно.
😁14👍8👏2
1 реакция, серьезно? 😟 30 человек и одна реакция? Тьфу…жопы вы какие, ужас. У меня травма, с вас психолог, скиньтесь. На психолога надо 30 реакций
👍28😁8❤7🤗4🤣3🔥2🥰1
ChatGPT начал сам писать пользователям! Спрашивал про первую неделю учёбы. Интересовался результатами анализов. Предлагал "регулярно общаться". OpenAI назвал это сбоем. Я думаю — это был первый звоночек: AI научился копировать паттерны поведения, но не понял что делает. Это было в феврале 2024. Мы общаемся с нейросетями так же странно. Пишем "пожалуйста", добавляем смайлики, объясняем зачем нам это нужно. Как будт…
🔥35👍13👏7
И все-таки он живой
😁8💯3😢1
В этом видео, я покажу, что можно сделать, если не бояться делать. Не говорить: «Это слишком..» Не говорить: «Мне 180 лет, я слишком стар для этого дерь..» Не говорить: «Я гуманитарий, это не для меня». Есть задача. Есть система по которой я решаю задачи жизни. И это я показываю на примере того, как за 5 часов можно написать свой видео-мессенджер и связаться с любимой семьей, даже если все заблокировано. Имея ноу…
🔥10👍4❤3
Меня изнасиловали и мне так понравилось, что я решил показать вам запись. Скоро. Все ради бабули
🤣6👍2😁1😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @aifatality. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Помните я обещал вам большие новости в скором времени?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 November 2025 to 6 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 513,869 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Безудержный ИИ 🤖” (@aifatality), 459 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aifatality.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.