Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AI Видосы

Channel

AI Видосы

@ai_video_feed

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18,561subscribers

+419 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002180980671
TypeChannel
Username@ai_video_feed
DescriptionСамое свежее видео-творчество от ИИ
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ai_video_feed

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

16.5 average views per post against 18,561 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.089%. Across the 25,159 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,619 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.70% and 23.1%, with a median of 11.7%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (31 July 2026 30 August 2026)
Posts measured412 of 412 published in the window (412 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled6,802
Mature posts only0.248% over 59 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers18,561 measured 29 August 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 25,159 channels · p10 2.89% · p25 5.70% · p50 11.7% · p75 23.1% · p90 41.5%
Position in cohort0.215th percentile · 1/125 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.156% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 30 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

18,14218,56418,3537 August 2026 — 18,142 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,149 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,166 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,169 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,170 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,336 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,446 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,450 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,454 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,442 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,434 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,433 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,434 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,433 subscribers22 August 2026 — 18,430 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,478 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,494 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,545 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,564 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,558 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,561 subscribers18,5617 August 202629 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 22 days, net +419. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,079–18,627 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 21:2518,561+3
29 Aug 2026, 00:3218,558-6
28 Aug 2026, 01:5418,564+19
27 Aug 2026, 03:3818,545+51
26 Aug 2026, 03:5618,494+16
25 Aug 2026, 00:5818,478+48
22 Aug 2026, 00:2818,430-3
20 Aug 2026, 15:3318,433-1
19 Aug 2026, 18:2218,434+1
18 Aug 2026, 19:1518,433-1
17 Aug 2026, 16:1718,434-8
16 Aug 2026, 08:0418,442-12
14 Aug 2026, 19:5818,454+4
13 Aug 2026, 11:1818,450+4
12 Aug 2026, 13:2818,446+110
11 Aug 2026, 16:3118,336+166
10 Aug 2026, 13:3318,170+1
9 Aug 2026, 15:1618,169+3
8 Aug 2026, 17:3618,166+17
7 Aug 2026, 16:5718,149first reading

Engagement

432 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.087%
avg views ÷ 18,561 subscribers
Avg views / post
16.1
432 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
432
of 432 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 432 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held432 (5 August 202630 August 2026)
Views total6,966
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7
Videos
6,960
Links
1,470

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 41m
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 432 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
466.7%
🌚116.7%
🔥116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 432 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 432 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC2 viewsread 30 August 2026
Video

Тотально неэпичный квест — Часть 1 Создавай видео с AI прямо в Telegram 🎬

30 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC9 viewsread 30 August 2026
Video

Тотально неэпичный квест Часть1 Создавай видео с AI прямо в Telegram 🎬

30 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC7 viewsread 30 August 2026
Video

Гимн игровой жизни (официальный клип GLA — тот самый) Создавай видео с AI прямо в Telegram 🎬

30 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC7 viewsread 30 August 2026
Video

Будущее уже здесь — просто никто ещё не в курсе. Создавай видео с AI прямо в Telegram 🎬

30 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC6 viewsread 30 August 2026
Video

Какой ИИ сотворил это видео — угадаешь с первого раза? Создавай видео с AI прямо в Telegram 🎬

30 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC7 viewsread 30 August 2026
Video

Тот самый диван Создавай видео с AI прямо в Telegram 🎬

30 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC10 viewsread 30 August 2026
Video

Японский оякодон: курица и яйцо наконец вместе Создавай видео с AI прямо в Telegram 🎬

30 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC10 viewsread 30 August 2026
Video

Вселенная всегда подмигивает знаками Создавай видео с AI прямо в Telegram 🎬

30 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC10 viewsread 30 August 2026
Video

Корни в кандалах: ода австралийским предкам‑каторжникам Создавай видео с AI прямо в Telegram 🎬

30 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC10 viewsread 30 August 2026
Video

v2.5 — лонгшот под полным контролем камеры Создавай видео с AI прямо в Telegram 🎬

30 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC7 viewsread 30 August 2026
Video

Мини-боевик без тормозов Создавай видео с AI прямо в Telegram 🎬

30 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC7 viewsread 30 August 2026
Video

КОГДА ЛАМПА РЕШАЕТ: ПОРА ЗАЖЕЧЬ Создавай видео с AI прямо в Telegram 🎬

Showing the 12 most recent of 432 posts we hold for @ai_video_feed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AI Видосы” (@ai_video_feed), 18,561 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ai_video_feed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.