Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Нейросети в университете | Лидия Каршакова

Channel

Нейросети в университете | Лидия Каршакова

@ai_lidiia_karshakova

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

221subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002442091249
TypeChannel
Username@ai_lidiia_karshakova
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/ai_lidiia_karshakova

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

221224222.57 August 2026 — 222 subscribers8 August 2026 — 222 subscribers2 October 2026 — 224 subscribers13 October 2026 — 221 subscribers7 August 202613 October 2026
4 measurements spanning 66 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 221–224 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Oct 2026, 01:47221-3
2 Oct 2026, 15:20224+2
8 Aug 2026, 10:32222no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:31222first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 17 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

57 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3154.4%
🔥1526.3%
👍1017.5%
🥰11.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2026 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Jul 2026, 05:58 UTC45 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Получила вчера степень д.с.ж. от детей. И что может быть важнее в этой жизни?

❤12

7 Jul 2026, 18:30 UTC64 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Уже завтра! 8 июля состоится открытие выставки "Динамика материи" теперь и в оффлайн формате Подробности на сайте. Ссылка в первом комментарии

❤2👍1🔥1

4 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC82 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Есть ощущение, что никогда так много не работала как в этом учебном году. 1. Была достаточно большая учебная нагрузка. Около 18 пар в неделю 2. Работала с проектом для школьников медиаклассов от агенства НашПресс 3. Работала экспертом демонстрационного экзамена по направлению "Моушен-дизайн" и "Цифровая иллюстрация" 4. Работала в жюри конкурса по анимации "Поиск НИТ" 5. Училась в СберУниверситете на направлении "Прод…

❤7👍6🔥2

23 Jun 2026, 08:37 UTC92 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Базовая потребность человека - быть нужным

❤8👍2

22 Jun 2026, 20:08 UTC90 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Универсальный шаблон для создания промпта (запроса) к нейросети с примерами на задачах учителя Ловите по ссылке 😊 https://vk.ru/wall-221979354_233

🔥1

22 Jun 2026, 20:05 UTC81 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В чате есть педагоги? За последний месяц у меня было три публичных выступления: один раз для школьников и два раза для учителей медиаклассов. И вот, что поняла. ИИ уже в школе — это факт. Дети пишут с ним сочинения, решают задачи, делают презентации. Вопрос не в том, «пускать или не пускать», а в том, как. Чтобы ИИ принес пользу, а не вред: 1. Учить критике Не «поверь», а «проверь». Где нейросеть ошиблась? Где…

❤1

20 Jun 2026, 16:46 UTC58 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Нужно ли использовать ИИ в школе

  1. Да, это неизбежно31%
  2. Категорически нет!31%
  3. Другое, напишу в комменарии15%
  4. Посмотреть ответы других23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥1

23 Mar 2026, 04:15 UTC131 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как вы думаете надо ли в школьное обучение внедрять нейросети? Поговорили со школьниками об этичном использвании ИИ. Организаторы Новостное агентство НАШпресс и координационный центр домена .RU/РФ

🔥2🥰1

21 Mar 2026, 06:13 UTC127 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Поговорили о самом сокровенном — о страхах, творчестве и о том, как нейросети могут стать нашими верными помощницами. О чём успели поболтать: ✨ Поделилась своей историей: как я сама боялась, что нейросети оставят меня без работы, а потом поняла — они как умная стиральная машина: берут на себя рутину и оставляют нам время на любимое дело. ✨ Вспомнила прошедший курс, где мамы учились использовать нейросети для дома, д…

❤1👍1

17 Mar 2026, 16:55 UTC134 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Прямо хвастаюсь Сделали редизайн сообщества в ВК. Заходите по ссылке выше ☝️ Мастер - Ксения. Вот ее контакт в ВК @ksenia_designer92 Пусть в мире будет больше красоты!

🔥8

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @ai_lidiia_karshakova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Jun 2026, 16:46 UTCAnonymous Poll13 voters

Нужно ли использовать ИИ в школе

  1. Да, это неизбежно31%
  2. Категорически нет!31%
  3. Другое, напишу в комменарии15%
  4. Посмотреть ответы других23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2026 to 11 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нейросети в университете | Лидия Каршакова” (@ai_lidiia_karshakova), 221 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ai_lidiia_karshakova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.