слушать музыку и забывать обо всем @xo_xo - Знакомства💕💕💕 Общение💕💕💕 Отношения💕💕💕
Views per post sit far below this size band
37.2 average views per post against 32,573 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.114%. Across the 8,358 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.04% and 20.9%, with a median of 10.4%.
| Window | 30 days (30 August 2026 – 29 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 176 of 176 published in the window (176 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 6,554 |
| Mature posts only | 0.127% over 141 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 32,573 measured 26 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:rus · 8,358 channels · p10 2.52% · p25 5.04% · p50 10.4% · p75 20.9% · p90 35.4% |
| Position in cohort | 0.299th percentile · 1/91 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
