2 measurements spanning 1 day, net +13,603. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 35,206β52,889 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Aug 2026, 00:23
50,849
+13,603
23 Aug 2026, 16:45
37,246
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 20 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR Β· 30 days
3.13%
avg views Γ· 50,849 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,590
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.8%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held
44 (20 August 2026 β 25 August 2026)
Views total
70,082
Reactions total
9,660
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
β11,900
Videos
β250
Links
β1,200
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 25 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
9,660 reactions across 44 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
β€
2,475
25.6%
π₯
2,424
25.1%
π
2,418
25.0%
π
2,333
24.2%
π
3
0.031%
π
3
0.031%
π―
2
0.021%
π
2
0.021%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 9,660reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
FORRADAAAAAAAAAA NO VIP HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
COMEΓAMOS A SEGUNDINHA COM TUDOOOOO HAHAHAHAHAHA
EU AVISEI QUE AS LIGAS EUROPEIAS RETORNANDO A FORRA SERIA MAIOR AINDA HAHAHAHAHA
IMAGINA COM CHAMPIONS VINDO POR AI, MΓS QUE VEM NFL E DAQUI 50 DIAS NBA π₯πππππ
SΓ FICA DE FORA QUEM Γ MALUCOOOOOO HAHAHAHA π₯π
E assim foi nosso domingoβ¦ fechamos mais um dia no vip sem red! Semana que passou foi maravilhosa demais!!! 4 dias saindo sem red lΓ‘ no vip e saindo 100% com um lucro absurdo πππππ
Hoje temos alguns jogos, mas nada relevanteβ¦ amanhΓ£ jΓ‘ comeΓ§a melhorar, tivemos nesse final de semana o retorno das ligas europeias e oficialmente nosso ano em meio as apostas comeΓ§aram π₯π
Quem quiser aproveitar a super promoΓ§Γ£o do vip e β¦
β€79π71π₯58π56
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @ahmariatps. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegramβs own answer, not this registerβs.When this register asks Telegramβs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it β never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramβs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramβs recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register β how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
LUKA MAGICπͺ FREE @lukamagictips Β· 144,412 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 66 here β alongside 65 others β read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βMaria Tips Freeπ₯β (@ahmariatps), 50,849 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ahmariatps.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.