Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -108. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,977–8,117 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 07:38
7,993
-13
11 Sept 2026, 23:22
8,006
-11
7 Sept 2026, 04:58
8,017
-9
2 Sept 2026, 14:05
8,026
-9
30 Aug 2026, 18:44
8,035
-9
27 Aug 2026, 12:13
8,044
-7
24 Aug 2026, 11:25
8,051
-12
20 Aug 2026, 11:43
8,063
-9
17 Aug 2026, 17:35
8,072
-5
14 Aug 2026, 17:47
8,077
-8
11 Aug 2026, 02:21
8,085
-16
7 Aug 2026, 15:37
8,101
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:19
8,101
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
41 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
22
53.7%
❤
19
46.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 September 2025 to 18 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یکی از دلایل کاهش قیمت دلار 👇 :
تسنیم:قالیباف قانون پیوستن ایران به CFT را ابلاغ کرد
رئیس مجلس در نامهای به مسعود پزشکیان رئیسجمهور، «قانون الحاق دولت جمهوری اسلامی ایران به کنوانسیون بینالمللی مقابله با تامین مالی تروریسم» را مطابق اصل ۱۲۳ قانون اساسی ابلاغ کرد.
@ahmadtarfavi
https://t.me/ahmad_tarfavi2
نظر شخصی
اگر دقت کرده باشید از دیروز بازار اصلاح کرد
در واقع بنظرم دارن نتیجه جلسه رو پیش خور میکنن
از طرفی دست به نقد هستن تا با هیجان اول وارد خرید بشن و استفاده کنن
تاریخ همیشه تکرار میشه فقط باید حافظه خوبی داشته باشی
مهارت و تجربه در این بازار علم رو شکست میده ✅
@ahmadtarfavi
https://t.me/ahmad_tarfavi2
امشب پاول سخنرانی داره مراقب باشید
تجربه اگر نداری ترید نکن
شانس خوشحالی نداره
سودی که با شانس بدست بیاری یک دام حساب میشه و شما چند برابر رو در جلسات بعدی و خبرهای بعدی از دست میدین
@ahmadtarfavi
https://t.me/ahmad_tarfavi2
قیمت فعلی دلار 111 هزار تومن
انتظار دارم تا 105 بیاد و اونجا برسی میکنم ببینم میتونه کف باشه یا نه
در مورد بنزین هم دارن صحبت هایی میاد که 14سهمیه ای بشه و 28 آزاد
@ahmadtarfavi
https://t.me/ahmad_tarfavi2
با یکم اختلاف برگشت اینم از ما قبول کنید
بازم احتمالش هست برسه به ناحیه اعلامی
خلاصه ما زمانی اعتقاد داشتیم که اعتقاد مد نبود
همه تارگت 112 میدادن برای اصلاح و ندیدم کسی که بگه ناحیه 95 تا 100
بازار یه رفتاری داره که اگر بتونی بشناسی تو اکثر اوقات برنده هستی
یادت باشه گفتم اکثر اوقات،نه همیشه
باید چیزی رو ترید کنی که میبینی
نه اون چیزی که دوست داری ببینی و یا فکر میکنی قراره اینجوری بشه
@ahmadtarfavi
https://t.me/ahmad_tarfavi2
XAUUSD
اینم نتیجه تصویر بالا
گفتم تا این ناحیه میاد و بعد میتونه یه بالا بده و مجدد وارد اصلاح بشه
دقیقا همون حرکت رو زد
حالا باید منتظر باشیم کف یا سقف شکسته بشه تا تکلیف مشخص بشه
بلند مدت صعودی
کلاسیکی تارگت های خودشو زده و باید منتظر باشیم
@ahmadtarfavi
https://t.me/ahmad_tarfavi2
👍4
Signed Ahmad_tarfavi
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ahmad_tarfavi1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ahmad_tarfavi1 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ahmadtarfav named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🚩سُرخ گرام|soerkh Gram🚩 @sorkh_geram · 30,556 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AHMAD_TARFAVI” (@ahmad_tarfavi1), 7,993 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ahmad_tarfavi1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.