Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

أَهْلُ السُّنَّةِ وَالْجَمَاعَةِ

@ahlussonna

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

6,484subscribers

+85 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001002636959
TypeChannel
Username@ahlussonna
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ahlussonna

Growth

6,3986,4846,4415 August 2026 — 6,399 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,399 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,398 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,402 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,484 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,385–6,497 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:386,484+82
9 Aug 2026, 04:206,402+4
6 Aug 2026, 10:506,398-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:206,399no change
5 Aug 2026, 20:026,399first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 6,484 subscribers
Avg views / post
660
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.674%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held27 (28 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total16,492
Reactions total107
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

96 reactions across 22 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8083.3%
👍1111.5%
👌44.17%
🙏11.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC470 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

فالله عز وجل أمرنا أن نفرح بفضل الله ولا شك أن مولد سيدنا رسول الله عليه الصلاة والسلام من فضل الله ومن رحمته بل هو عليه الصلاة والسلام رحمة للعالمين كما قال الله تعالى :( وَمَا أَرْسَلْنَاكَ إِلَّا رَحْمَةً لِّلْعَالَمِينَ)، ولذا جاء في كتاب الدرالمنثور للحافظ السيوطي (٤\٣٦٧) أخرج أبو الشيخ عن ابن عباس رضي الله عنهما في الآية قال : فضل الله العلم ، ورحمته النبي صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم ، قال الله تعالى: (وَمَا أَرْسَ

👍52

10 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC441 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

*أيام شهر الربيع أيام سرور وذكر وشكر لله تعالى وليست أيام جدال .وهكذا ينبغي أن تكون جميع أوقات المسلم..* *فقبل دخول شهر ربيع الأول يمكن للإنسان قراءة أدلة المولد وتكفيه ليعمل ويشكر لا ليضيع وقته مع البطالين في الجدال والقيل والقال. *وإليك هذه المقالة مع الأدلة التي تكفي كل عاقل منصف:* *الاحتفاء بالمولد النبوي* الحمد لله رب العالمين والصلاة والسلام على سيدنا محمد وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين. الكلام هنا إنما هو عن الاحتف

5

10 Aug 2026, 06:36 UTC390 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

أيام شهر الربيع أيام سرور وذكر وشكر لله تعالى وليست أيام جدال . فقبل دخول شهر ربيع الأول يمكن للإنسان قراءة أدلة المولد وتكفيه ليعمل ويشكر لا ليضيع وقته مع البطالين في الجدال والقيل والقال . وإليك هذه المقالة مع الأدلة التي تكفي كل عاقل منصف 👇

1

8 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC534 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

المدد والاستمداد قال الشيخ عبد الحق المحدث الدهلوي (١٥٥١ – ١٦٤٢ م) المشهور في شرحه على المشكاة باللغة العربية: ((أما الإستمداد بأهل القبور فقد أنكره بعض الفقهاء، فإن كان الإنكار من جهة أنه لا سماع لهم ولا علم ولا شعور بالزائر وأحواله فقد ثبت بطلانه، وإن كان بسبب أنه لا قدرة لهم ولا تصرف في ذلك الموطن حتى يمدوا، بل هم محبوسون عن ذلك ومشتغلون بما عرض لأنفسهم من المحنة ما شغلهم عمن عداهم فلا يرى ذلك كليا، خصوصا في شأن

13

8 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC517 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

الحكمة من المذاهب الأربعة قال الإمام ابن رجب الحنبلي رحمه الله تعالى: فلو استمر الحال في هذه الأزمان المتاخرة على ما كان عليه في الصدر الأول بحيث أن كل أحد يفتي بما يدعي أنه يظهر له أنه الحق ؛ لاختل به نظام الدين لا محالة ، ولصار الحلال حراما والحرام حلالا . ولقال كل من شاء ما يشاء ، ولصار ديننا بسبب ذلك مثل دين أهل الكتابين من قبلنا. فاقتضت حكمة الله سبحانه أن ضبط الدين وحفظه : بأن نصب للناس أئمة مجتمعا على علمهم ود

2

7 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC570 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

✅ تفصيل الفصل الثامن: في ذكر الحوادث التاريخية لأهل العلم في التبرك بالصالحين وآثارهم (صفحات ١٠٧-١١٦ في الكتاب) هذا الفصل يسرد حوادث واقعية من عصر الصحابة إلى العصور المتأخرة، يثبت فيها تبرك كبار العلماء والصالحين بآثار الصالحين (قبور، ثياب، أيمان، أماكن، دعاء...). المؤلف يعرضها بدون تعليق لتكون دليلاً عملياً على جواز التبرك. ### أبرز الحوادث التاريخية (مرتّبة كما في الكتاب): 1. الصحابة يتبركون بمحمد بن طلحة بن عب

6

7 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC590 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

قال الخطيب البغدادي رحمه الله: وليس ينبغي للعامي أن يُطالب المفتي بالحُجة فيما أجابه به، ولا يقول: لم؟ ولا كيف؟ قال الله سبحانه وتعالى: {فاسألوا أهل الذكر إن كنتم لا تعلمون}، وفرَّق تبارك وتعالى بين العامة وبين أهل العلم فقال: {قل هل يستوي الذين يعلمون والذين لا يعلمون} فإن أحب أن تسكُن نفسه بسماع الحُجة في ذلك سأل عنهَا في زمان آخرَ ومجلسٍ ثانٍ أو بعد قبول الفتوى من المفتي مجردة [الفقيه والمتفقه] ‏تابع قناة أهل ا

👍42

5 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC607 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

خامساً: الأشاعرة والماتريدية هم سواد الأمة، فمحاولةُ تصويرهم كطائفة شاذة نبتت في «عصور الانحطاط» مجازفةٌ يكذبها صريح الواقع وتاريخ الأمة. فهم السواد الأعظم، وجمهور العلماء، وحراس السنة، وقادة الفتوح، وهم أساطين الرواية والدراية. وختاماً أقول: إن تسفيه الجهود العقلية الباذخة التي سطرها جهابذة الإسلام حياطةً لجناب التوحيد، ورميها بالغباء والحماقة، لهو جراءة على العلم وطعن في عقل الأمة وتاريخها. لقد كان علم الكلام السني

9

5 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC588 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

كتب الدكتور سيف علي العصري: وقفتُ على مقالةٍ رامَ صاحبها الطعن في مسالك سادات الأمة وعلمائها، مجازفاً في القول، حائداً عن التحقيق. ويمكن تلخيص دعواه المتهافتة في مقامات أربع: أولها: توهُّمه أن تنزيه الباري جلَّ ثناؤه عن الزمان والمكان والحيز يُفضي إلى العدم. ثانيها: تشنيعُه على علم الكلام السُّنّيّ، ورميُه أئمته بالغباء والجنون، وجعله من مُخَلَّفات ما أسماه «عصور الانحطاط». ثالثها: احتجاجُه بترك الصحابة رضوان الله عل

4

5 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC590 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

قال الإمام ابن الجوزي رحمه الله: ✅ مَن أحبَّ أن يكون للأنبياء وارثاً، وفي مزارعهم حارثاً فليتعلم العلم النافع؛ وهو علم الدين، ففي الحديث: *{العلماء ورثة الأنبياء}*، وليحضر مجالس العلماء فإنها رياض الجنة. ✅ ومَن أحبَّ أن يعلم ما نصيبه من عناية الله فلينظر ما نصيبه من الفقه في دين الله، ففي الحديث: *{من يرد الله به خيرًا يفقهه في الدين}.* ✅ ومن سأل عن طريقٍ تبلّغه الجنة فليمشِ إلىٰ مجلس العلم، ففي الحديث: *{من سلك ط

3

4 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC746 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📩 رسالة إلى من يتسرَّع في التكفير ■ قال رسول الـلَّـه ﷺ: «لا يرمِي رجلٌ رجلا بالفسوق ولا يرميه بالكفر إلا ارتدَّت عليه إن لم يكن صاحبه كذلك». (صحيح البخاري). وقال ﷺ: « مَنْ دَعَا رَجُلاً بالكُفْرِ ، أو قالَ عَدُوَّ اللهِ وَلَيْسَ كَذلكَ إلا حَارَ عَلَيْهِ ». أي: رجع. (متفق عليه). ● قال ابن دقيق العيد: " هذا وعيد عظيم لمن كفَّر أحدًا من المسلمين وليس كذلك ، وهي ورطة عظيمة وقع فيها خلق كثير من المتكلمين ، ومن المنسو

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @ahlussonna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ahlussonna edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 70,021 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أَهْلُ السُّنَّةِ وَالْجَمَاعَةِ” (@ahlussonna), 6,484 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ahlussonna.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.