Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for عقیده اهل حدیث

Channel

عقیده اهل حدیث

@ahlol_hadiss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,312subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001643619256
TypeChannel
Username@ahlol_hadiss
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ahlol_hadiss

Growth

1,3011,3121,306.57 August 2026 — 1,301 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,303 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,304 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,310 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,312 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,299–1,314 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 10:381,312+2
14 Aug 2026, 03:571,310+6
11 Aug 2026, 04:571,304+1
8 Aug 2026, 04:131,303+2
7 Aug 2026, 11:181,301first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.4%
avg views ÷ 1,312 subscribers
Avg views / post
229
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total4,574
Reactions total49
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2959.2%
👍918.4%
💯816.3%
👏36.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC91 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

اگر فرقه ی کفری و طاغوتی و شرکی اشاعره دلیلی از صریح قرآن و سنت داشت نیاز به این نداشت که بزرگانش اینقدر آویزون عقلیات و فلسفه بشن مثل فخر رازی خیلی راحت می گفتند که بله فلان آیه و فلان حدیث و فلان اجماع منقول

👍1

6 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC101 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

سني : عقیده هو موجود بلامکان را از صریح قرآن و سنت ثابت کنید. پاسخ اشعری : بیشتر ملاها و آخوند ها و شیخ ها اشعری بوده اند. سني : عقیده هو موجود بلامکان را از صریح قرآن و سنت ثابت کنید. پاسخ اشعری : صلاح الدین ایوبی اشعری بوده و همچنین سلطان محمد عثمانی سني : عقیده هو موجود بلامکان را از صریح قرآن و سنت ثابت کنید. پاسخ اشعری : بیشتر شراح (که از پیش خودشان) صحیح بخاری رو شرح دادن اشعری بودن سني : عقیده هو موجود بلا

1👏1

6 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC80 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

السيوطي : ابْن تَيْمِية الشَّيْخ الإمام العَلامَة الحافِظ النّاقِد الفَقِيه المُجْتَهد المُفَسّر البارع شيخ الإسْلام علم الزهاد نادرة العَصْر تَقِيّ الدّين أبُو العَبّاس أحْمد بن المُفْتِي شهاب الدّين عبد الحَلِيم ابْن الإمام المُجْتَهد شيخ الإسْلام مجد الدّين عبد السَّلام بن عبد الله بن أبي القاسِم الحَرّانِي أحد الأعْلام ولد فِي ربيع الأول سنة إحْدى وسِتِّينَ وسِتمِائَة وسمع ابْن أبي اليُسْر وابْن عبد الدّائِم وعد

👍1

6 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC83 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ابن کثیر خودش اصلا علم تفسیر را از شیخ الاسلام آموخته است. و شاگرد شیخ الاسلام ابن تیمیه بوده است و هیچ شکی نیست که علم ابن تیمیه از ابن کثیر بالاتر بوده است. خیلی از ائمه ی سلف بوده اند که کتاب تفسیر ننوشته اند ؟ آیا این یعنی تفسیر نمی دانسته اند ؟ خیلی از ائمه ی سلف کتابی در حدیث تالیف نکرده اند ، آیا این یعنی حدیث نمی دانسته اند ؟ خیلی ها از ائمه از امام طبری به به تفسیر عالم تر بوده اند ، ولی تفسیر ننوشته اند.

1👏1

5 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC126 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔴الحافظ عماد الدين الواسطي می گوید در زیر آسمان همانند شیخ الاسلام دیده نشده است📣 https://t.me/ahlol_hadiss/8628

1

5 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC123 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔴الحافظ صلاح الدين العلائي : ابن تیمیة امام الائمة و آخرین مجتهد و وارث انبیاء است📣 👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/ahlol_hadiss/8627

1

2 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC211 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

کفر ناسیونالیستی واقعا بعضی ها را متاثر می کند

1

2 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC205 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

سیبویه که از ائمه ی لغت است از ایران بود

1

2 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC207 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

پس حدیث رسول الله صلی الله علیه وسلم که اگر ایمان در ثریا باشد ، مردانی از فارس به آن دست میابند چه می شود ؟ احساس می کنیم نویسنده این متن نژاد پرست عرب است نکه بسیاری بوده اند که لغت عربی هم خوب می دانسته اند و عرب بوده اند و از بزرگان گمراهی و کفر بوده اند. فيروز دیلمی صحابی رسول الله صلی الله علیه وسلم از فارس بود. منبه بن کامل صحابی رسول الله صلی الله علیه وسلم از فارس بود باذان رضی الله عنه فارس بود. جابان ال

1

2 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC171 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

سلمان فارسی رضی الله عنه فارس بود صهیب رومی از روم بود. بلال حبشی از حبشه بود. غیر از سلمان فارسی صحابه دیگری نیز بوده که فارس بوده اند و در هر طبقه از تابعین و اتباع تابعین ما ائمه ی سلف از ایرانی داریم

5

2 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC190 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

این رو ببینید👆👆 در مورد این که چرا باید از فهم سلف صالح تبعیت کنیم گفته است که چون که همه ی آنها عرب بوده اند. چه کسی این را گفته است ؟

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ahlol_hadiss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 518,015 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“عقیده اهل حدیث” (@ahlol_hadiss), 1,312 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ahlol_hadiss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.