Channel
@agathayik
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 17 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004397639177 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @agathayik |
| Created | 16 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 17 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/agathayik |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 1 | no change |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 1 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 16 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (16 September 2026 – 17 September 2026) |
| Views total | 102 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Sept 2026, 20:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Jadi, buat siapapun pls... Kalo mau rekber nyari yang bener² aman, misal ragu minta tolong orang sekitar biar ga kecolongan. Syukur uler kadut ku ga di colong. Aku cuma berdoa buat si penipu, SEMOGA EEK NYA KAYAK ULER DAH
Dan ini id dari orang² yang ada di gc rekber penipu itu
Oh ya, yang chat aku tuu yang ini. Pas di cek sama temenku memang gaada jejak nipu makanya aku percaya. Dia ngechat aku pake acc ini karena dia bilang acc utamanya limit dan yang limit ini acc nya prem.
Abis itu aku minta tolong temen ku buat login akun ku sekalian balesin chat dia. Ga lama aku di masukin gc yang isi nya ada 5 atau 6 gitu dan nama plus pp gc nya persis banget kayak rekber jeni yang asli. nah si penipu jahannam ini udah send bukti trx nya. Abis itu temen ku bales pake ss an bukti mereka nipu "DONE, THANKSSS" Abis itu apa? Yap, dia clear chat dan blokir aku.
Pas aku minta ke tempat rekber yang aku rekomendasiiin karna lumayan murah fee nya, dia malah ngatain "rekber apaan itu ga terkenal, udah di rekber jeni aja kak udah ku send form nya" (disini dia udah tau aku payment pake dana). Ih anak kucay, aku ga acc udah send form aja 🙂
Disini dia nanya harga dan avrek juga. Pas dia ngajak rekber di rekber jeni, feeling ku udah ga enak. Dalam hati aku nge batin "YAH REKBER INI LAGI, NTAR CLONE AKU YANG RUGI TAIK". mana disitu dia yang bikin form nya padahal aku belum setuju.
Abis itu dia jawab lagi, tentang gift ular kadut ku. Awalnya aku ga curiga dia penipu sama sekali
Begini chat nya, aku kan gatau dia nanya apa tau² "masih kak?". Memang penipu takda etika berkomunikasi cuhh Kalo nanya aku masih hidup of course masih wong aku nge pm
Awal cerita, aku pm gift uler kadut ku ke Base selain gift karna mau coba juga siapa tau ada yang tertarik. Dan setelah sekali pm tiba² ada yang chat aku
Halo semua, disini aku mau buat kronologi penipuan yang terjadi di aku semalam.
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @agathayik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Penipu ular kadut” (@agathayik), 1 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agathayik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.