Channel
@afvault
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
2,398subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001506196987 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @afvault |
| Created | 6 November 2023 β measured β cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/afvault |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 2,398 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 2,397 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 2,396 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 2,396 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (5 August 2026 β 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,057 |
| Reactions total | 282 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
282 reactions across 40 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 98 | 34.8% | |
| π― | 79 | 28.0% | |
| π | 66 | 23.4% | |
| π | 20 | 7.09% | |
| π | 18 | 6.38% | |
| π€¬ | 1 | 0.355% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 282reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @afvault. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Nick Fuentes TORCHES Tuckerβs βAmerica Firstβ coalition "In 2016, it was Donald Trump... And now the coalition is Marjorie Greene, Thomas Massie, Joe Kent. I mean, none of these people even win elections... It's like a jilted MAGA mom, a libertarian, some Fox News expat." π
β€5π―1
Nick Fuentes AGREES with Rabbi Mizrahi's take on the goyim "That's so true. These fucking goy, I mean, the way they just walk around everywhere. Fucking bastards."
π4β€3
Superchatter tells Nick he could easily make a hΡt piece on Sneako. "Oh, I easily could do that. I could easily. That's just not how I play, though. I'm not a hater. The things that I say about Sneako are descriptive. It's not hate."
β€4π―1
Nick Fuentes disagrees that Joe Rogan sneak-dissed him "Charlie Kirk was perceived as like a mainstream figure, had cachet with Trump in that personal relationship... he was the higher value target because of his proximity to the president and his ability to convert people."
β€4π1
Nick Fuentes calls out Candace and Ian Carroll for pushing conspiracy slop "Candace Owens is pushing that, not the system. It's coming from pizza delivery drivers like Ian Carroll. The elites don't even need to distract us. The Goy are distracting themselves."
β€4π―1
Nick Fuentes says Tucker's "above it all" stance on race and religion won't hold "It's a racialized politics, whether you like it or not. It's culture war. It's race war... if those forces become dominant, they will rip you the fuck apart."
β€5π1
Nick Fuentes says he's the last person to ask for marriage advice "I'm not married, so I don't know what even to do. People can't stand me⦠look at me, 109 friendships. Clearly I am not the authority on keeping people in my life."
β€3π2
Nick Fuentes shuts down a blackpilled Superchatter claiming Whites will be politically irrelevant "Whites are still the majority of the electorate. When you say Whites are irrelevant, that's just a totally ignorant statement."
β€3π1
Nick Fuentes says Southern Baptists hate Catholics more than anyone else "The Southern Baptist thing, they hate Catholics. Hate them... I'm glad to hear I broke you out of that. They hate Catholics more than they hate anybody else."
β€3π―3
Nick Fuentes calls cozying up to the left and Muslims fool's gold "They still fucking hate Trump 100%. And they still hate the rest of us. It's just dormant... They're still going to hunt you down when the war is over and k*II you or try you for war crimes."
β€5π―1
Nick Fuentes warns that getting used to suffering is a trap "You can get used to anything. It's a statement on human resilience... But it also means you can grow complacent, and never develop the spark that'll break you out of the stasis you're in."
β€5π―1
Nick Fuentes on Sneako's descent into obsession "He watches the show religiously, every night... I just break these people. I break weak minds. All I say about Sneako is just the obvious. He's a brown clown, an idiot. He just turned into a deranged lunatic."
β€5π―3
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @afvault. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 275,222 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπΈπ½ ππΈπππ πΊπΈβ (@afvault), 2,398 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/afvault.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.