Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Жизнь после Завода

Channel

Жизнь после Завода

@afterzavod

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,210subscribers

+360 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001422703336
TypeChannel
Username@afterzavod
DescriptionВсе о заработке в интернете, финансовой грамотности и свободе от финансового рабства XXI века. Реклама и сотрудничество: @S1M1K
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/afterzavod

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,8477,2107,028.57 August 2026 — 6,850 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,850 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,847 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,850 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,849 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,864 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,874 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,892 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,910 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,919 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,928 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,948 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,983 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,989 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,995 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,010 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,016 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,020 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,054 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,084 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,113 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,138 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,146 subscribers14 November 2026 — 7,210 subscribers7 August 202614 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 100 days, net +360. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,793–7,264 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 14:177,210+64
9 Nov 2026, 12:097,146+8
6 Nov 2026, 06:557,138+25
3 Nov 2026, 02:467,113+29
30 Oct 2026, 19:587,084+30
27 Oct 2026, 16:497,054+34
24 Oct 2026, 20:117,020+4
21 Oct 2026, 20:577,016+6
19 Oct 2026, 01:287,010+15
15 Oct 2026, 23:286,995+6
12 Oct 2026, 13:066,989+6
5 Oct 2026, 09:376,983+35
27 Sept 2026, 08:596,948+20
15 Sept 2026, 10:006,928+9
12 Sept 2026, 05:396,919+9
7 Sept 2026, 18:146,910+18
2 Sept 2026, 16:156,892+18
30 Aug 2026, 22:346,874+10
27 Aug 2026, 23:426,864+15
21 Aug 2026, 04:346,849first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.0%
avg views ÷ 7,210 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,800
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held43 (16 July 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total32,411
Reactions total347
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 17:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
467
Videos
45
Links
843

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
8m 27s
Average length
1m 25s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

805 reactions across 41 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥42352.5%
👍23028.6%
❤10012.4%
😁172.11%
👏91.12%
👌80.994%
🤔80.994%
😱70.87%
💋20.248%
🥰10.124%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 805 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 43 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @afterzavod. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 15 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (5.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Nov 2026, 09:02 UTC611 views18 reactionsread 15 November 2026

​🎞 ЗАПИСЬ УБТ МИТАПА 🎞 ⛔️ Ютуб, к сожалению, снес запись стрима за NSFW (хотя там нюдсов не было, только разговоры). Но видео доступно тут по ссылке ⬇️ https://streamyard.com/ke5xfb6wv2dd875g 🙃 Кто не смог глянуть в онлайне, но очень хотел посмотреть в записи - велком!

🔥12👍3❤2👌1

13 Nov 2026, 15:20 UTC≈1,070 views16 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🔥 ПРОБНЫЕ РИЛСЫ - ИМБА 🔥 🧑‍💻 Продолжаю тестить Trial Reels. Те свежие рилсы, про которые говорил в этом посте, начали набирать просмотры. 🤔 Фишка в том (и даже сама инста об этом пишет), что пробники могут сначала набирать крохи типа 200-300 просмотров, а потом 2-3 дня резко стрельнуть на сотни тысяч. 📉 Видимо алгоритм осторожно подбирает вам аудиторию, потом находит и дает много трафа. Я следил за статкой, сначал…

🔥11❤2👍2👏1

12 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,190 views6 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🗣 УБТ-митап от GoAFF 🗣 😎 Начинаем уже через час! Первым выступаю я, а в конце доклада отвечу на ваши вопросы. Поэтому залетайте, будет интересно. 📅 Начало: Сегодня в 19:00 (по Москве) 📍 Где: YouTube 👉 Смотреть

👍4🔥1😁1

12 Nov 2026, 10:40 UTC≈1,240 views16 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

👁 ПРОБНЫЕ REELS 👁 🧑‍💻 Затестил функционал пробных рилсов в инстаграме. И результаты весьма впечатляющие. 👥 Пробные reels это рилсы, которые НЕ показываются вашим подписчикам, а сразу идут на широкую аудиторию. Что это дает? 🫤 Подписчики могут устать от вашего контента и будут пролистывать новые рилсы. Из-за этого инста думает, что рилс плохой и не крутит его дальше. 👀 В случае пробных рилсов, он показывается сраз…

👍9🤔4🔥3

11 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🛍 ЧЕРНАЯ ПЯТНИЦА В VISION 🛍 🎁 Вот и настало время распродаж. И, конечно, ребята из Vision завезли вкусные скидки для нас. ВАШИ ПРИВИЛЕГИИ В ЭТУ ЧЕРНУЮ ПЯТНИЦУ: 👉 Промокод VISIONSALE26 даст 20% скидку на ПРОДЛЕНИЕ любого тарифа. На сайте уже доступны: 👉 Скидка на оплату тарифов на полгода - 30%! 👉 Скидка на годовые тарифы - 40%! ⏳ Акция проходит: с 11 ноября 12:00 до 30 ноября 23:59 (GMT+3) 👍 Если хотели начать п…

10 Nov 2026, 11:41 UTC≈1,420 views17 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @goaff_mediaPhoto

⚡Со $100 до $1800 на первых тестах ниши AI-моделей 12 ноября на встрече с автором канала «Жизнь после завода» поговорим о создании AI-персонажей и контента для них. А еще обсудим: • Сколько нужно привлекать аудитории из Instagram и Facebook. • Ошибки первых запусков. • Нюансы внешности моделей. • Тонкости монетизации в ТГ и экономику. • Минимальный стек, который потребуется для работы. Если вы в теме УБТ, та…

🔥13👍4

9 Nov 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,520 views20 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

📊 113K ПРОСМОТРОВ НА ПЕРВОМ РИЛСЕ 📊 📈 В общем рилс в итоге набрал 113к просмотров. Напоминаю, он был первым залитым на ФП. Редко такое бывает, но мне повезло. 📉 Последующие набрали уже намного меньше. Видимо, не зацепились. Но это нормально, продолжаем работу. 💻 Как наберется 500 подписчиков, я поставлю ссылки на ТГ канал. А по набору 1000 подписчиков, перейду уже на посты с фотками.

🔥17❤3

5 Nov 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,990 views17 reactions1 Starread 15 November 2026
Photo

🧑‍💻 ПРОГРЕВ FACEBOOK 🧑‍💻 💻 На ютубе недавно рассказывал про прогрев инстаграм аккаунтов перед заливом. А что там с ФБ? Нужно ли его тоже греть? ❤️ После реги я обязательно в течение нескольких дней делаю соц активность - лайки, подписки, просмотры. По сути как и в случае инсты. 👍 Если акк не забанился за это время, то переношу его в антик и начинаю с ним работать. Тут главное помнить, что трафик идет с фан пейджей…

🔥9❤3👍3👏1🤔1

31 Oct 2026, 15:45 UTC≈2,520 views13 reactionsread 15 November 2026

​📽 GROK ДЛЯ ГЕНЕРАЦИИ ВИДЕО 📽 💸 С тех пор как грок стал платным, его популярность среди убтшников заметно снизилась. Но я продолжаю его юзать. 🤔 Почему? Да тупо из-за дешевизны. Генерит видео он откровенно не очень, но этого хватает для рилсов в ФБ и инсте. 💰 На самом дешевом тарифе (10$) в месяц получается около 200 генераций по 6 сек. В месяц 200 рилсов можно сделать. Стоимость одного - 5 центов. 📈 Тогда как кр…

🔥5❤3👍3👏1😁1

30 Oct 2026, 10:00 UTC≈2,210 views72 reactions1 Starread 15 November 2026

​🚀 ЗАЛИВ НА ИИ МОДЕЛЬ С НУЛЯ ДО ПЕРВОГО ТРАФИКА 🚀 💡 Пришла в голову мысль сделать цикл видео по УБТ заливам на ИИ модель с нуля и до первого трафика. Для этого я сделал отдельную модельку, буду показывать на ней. 💻 Первый ролик про регистрацию аккаунтов я уже записывал. Как создать ИИ модель с нуля тоже. На очереди ролик про прогрев аккаунтов; он будет буквально на днях. 📲 Далее буду заливать рилсы в инсту/фб и за…

🔥50👍12❤10

27 Oct 2026, 10:03 UTC≈2,310 views6 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Идеальный спай теперь полностью бесплатный 👀 Почему спай идеальный? ➡️В нем только гембла. Больше никаких фильтров по доменам или ключевым словам. 4 независимые ИИ-модели просматривают всю рекламу ФБ и забирают на ваши экраны только гембловые объявления. ➡️Никаких лимитов. Сиди листай хоть 24 часа. ➡️0$ и 0 копеек за все. Полностью бесплатный инструмент, который останется бесплатным и завтра, и через год. Никаких…

👍3❤1🔥1🤔1

26 Oct 2026, 14:30 UTC≈2,190 views21 reactionsread 15 November 2026

​📲 КАК СМЕНИТЬ ПЕРСОНАЖА В ВИДЕО 📲 💻 Еще один способ копирования чужих залетевших рислов и замена в них персонажа на свою AI модель. Уже выложил на ютубе. ▶️ RunningHub: https://www.runninghub.ai?inviteCode=asqltoey - по моей ссылке вы должны получить 500 бесплатных кредитов. ✍️ Промпты, которые я использовал: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dMgdxJxFbERPX8HdFhhcHd12f4cusyFGcTpg9bWCyFQ/edit?usp=sharing ⏬ Ворк…

👍8🔥8❤4💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @afterzavod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @afterzavod as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
15 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Деньги Есть! 🏆 dengi4444
@dengi4444 · 23,541
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
PIRATE CPA // Channel
@piratecpa · 29,444
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 9 September 2026
Traffic Cardinal | Арбитраж трафика
@trafficcardinal · 20,452
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 3 October 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Жизнь после Завода” (@afterzavod), 7,210 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/afterzavod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.