3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,847–6,850 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 03:58
6,847
-3
7 Aug 2026, 10:43
6,850
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:15
6,850
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.7%
avg views ÷ 6,847 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,560
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
15 (16 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
21,791
Reactions total
248
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 02:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 21s
Average length
7m 21s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
259 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
169
65.3%
👍
68
26.3%
❤
12
4.63%
😁
7
2.70%
👏
1
0.386%
🤔
1
0.386%
🥰
1
0.386%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 259reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @afterzavod. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💸 ВЛОЖИЛ $2 - ЗАРАБОТАЛ $80 💸
✍️ Был коммент на ютубе типа что это за бесплатный трафик такой, когда нужно платить за нейронки, прокси, антики и т. д.
👆 На скринах мой средний расход на генерацию в сутки (сервис wavespeed). И доходы с каждого из 3-х каналов AI моделей за один конкретный день 3 августа 2026 года.
💻 Да, конечно, еще нужен антик, который выходит 1$ в день (30 в месяц) и прокси ($2 в месяц). Ну если о…
🚀 Глобальная премьера: AI Future Forum 2026 в Дубае! 🚀
📆 1–2 декабря в рамках Blockchain Life 2026 – одного из самых масштабных мировых событий по Web3, майнингу, криптовалютам и AI, состоится премьера AI Future Forum – международного форума, посвященного искусственному интеллекту, робототехнике, технологиям будущего и новой цифровой экономике.
👥 Форум объединит более 15 000 участников из 130+ стран, 200+ спикеров…
⭐️ ВЫВОД ЗВЕЗД С TELEGRAM ⭐️
❓ Очень часто спрашиваете как я вывожу звезды с телеграм каналов. Вот что нужно сделать.
✅ Выводить можно не ранее чем через 21 день после поступления звезд на баланс. Минималка - 1000 звезд
1️⃣ Жмем кнопку "Вывести звезды" и переходим на официальную биржу Fragment
2️⃣ Проходите KYC. Можно проходить на себя. Фрагменту глубоко пофиг что вы публиковали в ТГ и он это не видит. Со всех ва…
SHOP — инфраструктура под ключ для тех, кто запускает рекламу каждый день
Что есть в наличии:
🔹 Аккаунты FARM Facebook — трастовые профили 2021+ года, с историей активности, привязкой к физическим SIM и полным доступом. Не пустышки — реальные страницы, готовые к работе. У нас их берут даже несколько Агентских компаний.
🔹 Бизнес-менеджеры — проверенные БМ OLD, с пикселями, под залив Тайваня и Сингапура. Без сюрприз…
💸 РАСХОДЫ НА УБТ ТРАФИК 💸
✍️ Получил интересный комментарий на ютубе к недавнему видео про заработок на УБТ и AI моделях:
"За прокси заплати, за браузер заплати, за акк заплати, за нейронки заплати, а по итогу хорошо чтобы на пельмени хватило, ато еще и в минус уйдешь"
💻 Если что, убт - условно-бесплатный трафик. На то он и условный, что платить все равно приходится за инструменты и расходники.
📊 Лично у меня в …
🟢 ПЛЮСЫ ЛИТЬ В ТГ КАНАЛ (НА СЕБЯ) 🟢
💻 В продолжение темы слива УБТ трафика. Почему лить на себя в тг канал выгоднее? Я приведу несколько пунктов:
✅ Вы не зависите от партнерки и рекла - нет отключений офферов и никто вам не срежет пейауты
✅ Один подписчик монетизируется не один раз (как в ПП по CPA модели), а МНОГО раз
✅ При бане ваших источников трафика, доход не проседает моментально, а аудитория сохраняется в ва…
🤔 К ЧЕРТУ ПАРТНЕРКИ? 🤔
💸 На скрине доход с моей самой слабой AI модели за сутки. Внушительно, однако. Смотрю на него и думаю - а нафига мне лить в партнерки, когда можно лить на себя?
🧑💻 Но, как обычно, не все так просто. ПП закрывают вопросы контента, монетизации, обработки трафика и т.д. С вас только трафик.
🧑🔧 А если вы льете на себя, то у вас в х2-х3 раза больше работы. Но и профиты выше (не сразу).
🖥 Короч…
🚀 ИЗ INDIGO В VISION 🚀
⏳ 31 августа 2026 года Indigo Browser официально прекращает работу. Всех планируют перевести в Multilogin по умолчанию.
💻 А это значит, что самое время перейти с Индиго на Vision! Тем более сейчас это можно сделать на супер выгодных условиях.
📩 До 19:00 31.08.2026 (GMT+3) напишите кодовое слово «RIPINDIGO» в саппорт на сайте или в официальном боте поддержки — и вам оформят компенсацию за те…
🚫 БАНЫ ЗА НЕОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЙ КОНТЕНТ 🚫
🤜 Фейсбук серьезно взялся за оригинальность контента. Страницы за это отлетают только так, как горячие пирожки.
⚙️ Причем, видимо, алгоритм еще сырой и часто ошибается. Лично у меня 80% страниц вылетело из рекомендаций именно по причине "неоригинального контента", хотя все фотки я генерил сам лично и нигде они не светились.
✍️ Может быть причина в текстах (они однотипные), может …
🔞 БЕСПЛАТНЫЕ НЕЙРОНКИ ДЛЯ 18+ ФОТО 🔞
💻 Выложил ролик с подборкой 3-х нейронок с бесплатным периодом/токенами для генерации. Подойдут для быстрых тестов или абуза (если практикуете).
👇 Смотреть 👇
https://youtu.be/IspcWWufsxI
➡️ Результаты генерации ТУТ - https://disk.yandex.ru/d/UjMfD9NM6wJ-sg
😕 НЕ СУДЬБА 😕
🤷 Я хз что там ютубу не нравится в этой теме, но он опять снес ролик. Причем в видео не было ни полуголых девиц, ни слов триггеров, вообще ничего! Выкладываю тут файлом для вас, надеюсь, будет полезно.
🤔 Почему-то сочетание "нано банана и 18+" ютуб не любит. Причем сервисы для 18+ генераций когда обозреваешь, все окей. Логика 80 лвл.
🙃 Способ, конечно, скорее такой лайфхак на тему фейсвапа. Если нужн…
🔞 ДЕЛАЕМ 18+ КОНТЕНТ В NANO BANANA 🔞
💻 Ранее выкладывал подобный ролик, но его снес ютуб. Решил записать по-другому. Надеюсь, в этот раз он будет жить. Лайфхак интересный и юзабельный.
👇 Смотреть 👇
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MtZKh4-xCY
☺️ Да, это уловка, но она работает и ее хватает для УБТ трафика с тех же ФБ/инсты. Пользуйтесь!
✅ Промпт для дорисовывания лица из видео:
Complete the image by regenerating …
👍5🔥2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @afterzavod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,132,103 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Жизнь после Завода” (@afterzavod), 6,847 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/afterzavod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.