Channel
@afonina_enjoyer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
271subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001854911569 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @afonina_enjoyer |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/afonina_enjoyer |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 271 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 272 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 272 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
115 reactions across 8 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 70 | 60.9% | |
| 🍓 | 10 | 8.70% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 6.09% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 5.22% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 5.22% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 4.35% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 2.61% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 2.61% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 2.61% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.87% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.87% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 30 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Чистила зубы с утра и ощутила всем телом, что означает поддержка. Решила поделиться. Новый проект начинается не с документов. Не со стандартов/регламентов и бизнес-процессов. Безусловно, всё это важно. Новый проект начинается с внутреннего преодоления: входить в новую команду новую культуру/новый мир всегда непросто. Даже если за плечами большой опыт, даже если понимаешь, как должны работать процессы, всё равно вп…
❤13🕊2
Одно наблюдение, которое преследует меня в отелях. Дизайнеры не любят навигацию. Она «портит» картинку, перегружает стены, мешает концепции. И всё же - сколько раз вы сами шли по коридору и мечтали увидеть нужную стрелку? Когда мы обновляли навигацию у себя, не гадали и не опирались только на планировку. Спросили сотрудников. Именно они знают, в каких точках холла гости чаще всего останавливаются с растерянным видо…
🍓5👍5❤1🔥1
Стейкейшн - это когда отдыхаешь дома. Не дома в четырёх стенах, а в своём месте проживания - но как турист. Снять отель, отключиться от быта, не думать о готовке и уборке. Всё то же самое ощущение отпуска - без перелётов и чемоданов. Недавно побывала в Carina Park Hotel - и это именно такая история. Концепция вокруг природы: живые деревья внутри здания в полную высоту, амфитеатр, парк снаружи. Пространство, где чув…
❤10🥰4🕊1
Иногда я балуюсь - смотрю интересные отели. Особенно люблю проекты-переделки. Есть отели, куда едут переночевать. А есть - ради которых летят в страну. Именно так появляются destination-отели: когда архитектура становится главным маркетингом, а пространство само объясняет ценность. Yangshuo Sugar House - бывший сахарный завод в карстовых горах Китая, который не снесли и не «осовременили». Индустриальные корпуса …
❤9🔥4🍓3
Проснуться в отеле. Чувствовать хрустящее белье и кофе кажется особенно вкусным. Моя любовь к отелям безмерна
❤17🐳3🍓2
Когда вы обычно бронируете отель?
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Коллеги, есть ощущение, что глубина бронирования снова схлопывается. Последние месяцы в нескольких городских отелях, с которыми работаю, вижу одну и ту же картину: основной поток бронирований приходит за 5-7 дней до заезда. То есть мы снова живём в режиме “решил - поехал - забронировал”. При этом, отраслевые отчёты говорят другое: средняя глубина бронирования по миру - около 30 дней. Но если честно - в операционно…
💯4👌3🔥2🤝1😐1
Мы имеем уже устойчивый новый слой гостеприимства - рынок апарт-отелей. Меняется наш образ жизни как гостя. И вместе с этим растёт этот сегмент. Апарт-отели начинают выглядеть выгоднее традиционных отелей: # ниже операционная нагрузка на персонал # быстрее запуск # гибче продукт # проще адаптация под реальный запрос, а не под стандарт звёздности. Это не про моду. Это про экономику и логику времени. Но для меня важн…
❤7💯2
По мотивам морозного, снежного загородного отдыха. Сценарий отдыха с семьёй, особенно со взрослыми родителями, совсем иной. Когда путешествуешь с детьми, ты ценишь внимание к ним. Но когда видишь искреннюю заботу о своих родителях - это трогает глубже. После мороза - тёплый холл без суеты. Не торопят. Спокойно объясняют. Предлагают удобное кресло. В номере - свет, тепло и продуманные детали. В такие моменты понимаеш…
❤13🥰2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @afonina_enjoyer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Когда вы обычно бронируете отель?
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 30 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,366,099 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“В гостях у Афониной | сила сервиса” (@afonina_enjoyer), 271 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/afonina_enjoyer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.