National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
50 measurements spanning 80 days, net -624. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,702–18,655 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 50
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 20:07
17,812
-16
7 Nov 2026, 13:19
17,828
-20
6 Nov 2026, 10:16
17,848
-11
5 Nov 2026, 12:36
17,859
-8
4 Nov 2026, 13:56
17,867
-4
3 Nov 2026, 15:07
17,871
-10
2 Nov 2026, 13:27
17,881
-18
1 Nov 2026, 16:28
17,899
-13
31 Oct 2026, 15:06
17,912
-6
30 Oct 2026, 12:10
17,918
-8
29 Oct 2026, 15:06
17,926
-17
28 Oct 2026, 17:10
17,943
-11
27 Oct 2026, 19:56
17,954
-16
26 Oct 2026, 17:16
17,970
-15
25 Oct 2026, 15:31
17,985
-7
24 Oct 2026, 15:10
17,992
-17
23 Oct 2026, 12:41
18,009
-20
22 Oct 2026, 09:09
18,029
-13
21 Oct 2026, 03:55
18,042
-16
19 Oct 2026, 22:58
18,058
first reading
Engagement
161 posts held, back to 16 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.2%
avg views ÷ 17,812 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,350
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.162%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 161 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
161 (16 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
56,510
Reactions total
86
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 16:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
357 reactions across 112 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
246
68.9%
😁
35
9.80%
👍
29
8.12%
😭
15
4.20%
😢
9
2.52%
🔥
8
2.24%
👎
4
1.12%
💔
4
1.12%
🥰
3
0.84%
👨💻
1
0.28%
🤔
1
0.28%
🤬
1
0.28%
🥱
1
0.28%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 117 of the 161 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 357 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 161 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 160 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @afghnistaninternational. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 161 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
امریکا در نشست وزیران خارجه گروه ۲۰ در اتلانتا، نگرانیهای پاکستان درباره فعالیت گروههای تروریستی در افغانستان را تایید کرد. وزیر خارجه امریکا، در این نشست گفت: «ما با پاکستان موافقیم و نمیخواهیم این کشور هدف تروریسم قرار گیرد.»
علی مهر، پژوهشگر مستقل پاکستانی و تحلیلگر روابط بینالملل، در مقالهای برای افغانستان اینترنشنال مینویسد: سخنان وزیر خارجه امریکا نشان میدهد که واشنگتن نگرانیهای امنیتی پاکستان را جدی م…
عبدالله، جوان ۲۴ ساله، شام دوشنبه (۱۱ عقرب)، هنگام بازگشت از محل کار، در مقابل خانهاش در قلعه بابو واقع در ناحیه ششم شهر کابل از سوی افراد ناشناس به قتل رسید.
یکی از بستگان عبدالله به افغانستان اینترنشنال میگوید که مهاجمان ناشناس او را با ضربات چاقو به قتل رساندهاند.
به گفته اعضای خانواده، عبدالله در یک سلمانی کار میکرد و هنگام وقوع این رویداد تنها ۳۰۰ افغانی پول نقد همراه داشت.
https://afintl.com/202611052310
احمد مسعود، رهبر جبهه مقاومت ملی در مراسم سالگرد ترور مصطفی کاظمی گفت که هزارهها و شیعیان افغانستان با تبعیض، محدودیتهای مذهبی و نقض حقوق اساسی خود روبهرو هستند.
او تأکید کرد که نمیتوان در برابر سرکوب یک گروه سکوت کرد و همزمان مدعی آزادی برای دیگر مردم افغانستان بود.
https://afintl.com/202611059343
مارشال عبدالرشید دوستم، رهبر حزب جنبش ملی افغانستان، در نشستی به مناسبت سالگرد کشتهشدن مصطفی کاظمی گفت که نظام طالبان ماندنی نیست و در نهایت سقوط خواهد کرد.
او تأکید کرد که مردم افغانستان هرگز کسانی را که در راه آزادی کشور جان باختهاند، فراموش نخواهند کرد.
https://afintl.com/202611052772
مجله آتلانتیک گزارش داد که دونالد ترامپ، رئیسجمهور امریکا درباره عملکرد پیت هگست، وزیر جنگ امریکا، و جنرال دن کین، رئیس ستاد مشترک ارتش، از افراد نزدیک به خود نظر خواسته است. بر اساس این گزارش، ترامپ توجه خود را به مشاورانی معطوف کرده که به او اطمینان داده بودند جنگ با جمهوری اسلامی سریع و قاطع خواهد بود.
https://afintl.com/202611024065
دونالد ترامپ، رئیسجمهور امریکا میگوید اگر دموکراتها در انتخابات میاندورهای کنترول کانگرس را به دست بگیرند، ممکن است آنقدر از حق خود برای رد مصوبات کانگرس استفاده کند که به «آقای وتو» تبدیل شود.
ترامپ گفت در صورت پیروزی دموکراتها، ابتدا طرحهای مصوب کانگرس را وتو خواهد کرد و احتمالا پس از یک یا دو ماه، برای دستیابی به توافق با آنها وارد مذاکره خواهد شد.
https://afintl.com/202611026354
سازمان خبرنگاران بدون مرز نام هبتالله آخندزاده و دونالد ترامپ را در فهرست ۳۳ فرد و نهادی قرار داده است که به گفته این سازمان، در سال ۲۰۲۶ آزادی رسانهها را محدود کردهاند.
این سازمان از سیاستهای سرکوبگرانه طالبان در افغانستان و محدودیت دسترسی خبرنگاران به نهادهای حکومتی در امریکا انتقاد کرده است.
https://afintl.com/202611010799
خانواده جنرال مطیعالله خان، فرمانده پیشین پولیس ارزگان، ادعای طالبان درباره کشف جنگافزار در خانه او را رد کرد. آنان روز دو شنبه، چهارم عقرب، به افغانستان اینترنشنال گفتند که با وجود داشتن عفونامه، افراد طالبان این خانواده را اذیت میکنند.
فرماندهی پولیس طالبان در ولایت ارزگان روز یکشنبه، سوم عقرب، ادعا کرد که نیروهای این گروه در عملیاتی در شهر ترینکوت، در نزدیکی خانه یکی از مقامهای نظامی حکومت پیشین، چهار میل اسل…
در ۴ عقرب ۱۳۸۰، فرمانده عبدالحق، در حالی که بر اسب سوار بود، تلاش میکرد از محاصره طالبان در ولسوالی ازره ولایت لوگر بیرون شود. در روستای غوگیزی، جنگجویان طالبان در اطراف سنگر گرفته بودند.
تنها چند تن با او همراه بودند و چرخبالهای امریکایی برای کمک بهموقع به او نرسیدند. حوالی ساعت سه شب طالبان او را بازداشت کردند.
عبدالحق در پاییز سال ۱۳۸۰ با طرحی سیاسی برای پایان دادن به حاکمیت طالبان و فراهمکردن زمینه خروج مس…
حضور مدیرعامل شرکت موترسازی آئودی در گردهمایی انتخاباتی رئیسجمهور امریکا در ایالت جورجیا و اعلام برنامه ساخت یک کارخانه چهار میلیارد دالری در این کشور، واکنشهای تندی در آلمان برانگیخته است.
منتقدان میگویند که این اقدام با اصل بیطرفی سیاسی شرکت آئودی مغایرت دارد.
https://afintl.com/202610261780
دونالد ترامپ، رئیسجمهور امریکا در گردهمایی انتخاباتی در میشیگان، عبدل السید، نامزد مسلمان دموکرات برای مجلس سنا را با عاملان حمله ۱۱ سپتامبر مقایسه کرد و از رایدهندگان خواست مانع پیروزی او شوند.
السید اتهام ارتباط با گروههای اسلامگرا، از جمله اخوانالمسلمین را رد کرده است.
https://afintl.com/202610265309
وزارت داخله طالبان روز شنبه دوم عقرب اعلام کرد که دهها دوربین امنیتی به هزینه هفتونیم میلیون افغانی در شهر شرنه، مرکز ولایت پکتیکا نصب کرده است.
روشن نیست که هزینه خرید این دوربینها از بودجه وزارت داخله پرداخت شده یا از مردم محل جمعآوری شده است.
پیش از این طالبان در کابل و برخی شهرهای دیگر باشندگان شهر را به خرید دوربینهای امنیتی وادار کرده بود.
وزارت امور داخله طالبان در خبرنامهای نوشت در مراسم افتتاح دوربی…
❤7😁3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 161 posts we hold for @afghnistaninternational. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @afghnistaninternational as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
31 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
31 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
13 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
طلوع نیوز TOLOnews Plus @Tolo_news · 57,150 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
🔥کابل دالر 🔥هدف @kabulvip · 43,522 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
BBC News فارسی @news_bbc_persian · 50,234 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 October 2026
Amazon Persian @Amazon_Persian1 · 27,123 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
کابل دالر آنلاین 🟢 @kabul_dollar_12 · 54,287 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 August 2026
نرخ لحظه ای اسعار @NERKH_YAB · 84,849 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 August 2026
نرخ اسعار لحظه به لحظه 🇦🇫 ️ @exchange_rate · 70,181 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
دالر کابل @kabul_Doolar · 30,963 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 5 September 2026
تحلیل اصلی بزرگ جهانی♻️ @Goldsilveerrr1 · 52,757 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
پایگاه خبری هرات @HeratNewsCentre · 30,381 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 September 2026
مزار نرخ @Mazar_Nerkh · 29,950 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 8 September 2026
دالر مزار شریف @mzar_dalar · 47,515 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 26 August 2026
کابل نرخ اسعار @kabul0nerkh · 21,329 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 September 2026
کابل نرخ دالر kabul @kabul_dalarr_Toman · 120,443 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
Wazifaha.org @wazifaha · 86,003 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 August 2026
کابل دالر @kabul_dollar · 311,044 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 August 2026
خبرآنلاین هرات🇦🇫 @Newsof_Herat · 105,919 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 29 August 2026
قیمت لحظهای دالر کابل @DollarKabul · 111,895 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 August 2026
صرافی های سرای شهزاده و تحلیل نقره @kabuldollor · 53,885 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
نرخ لحظه به لحظه تومان به افغانی🇦🇫 @rahimallahjan1 · 75,565 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 21 August 2026
نرخ یاب کابل کندهار @kabul_No1 · 19,889 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 September 2026
Scholarship for Afghanistan بورسیه های تحصیلی برای افغانستان @scholarships4af · 67,971 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“افغانستان انترنشنال Afghanistan International” (@afghnistaninternational), 17,812 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/afghnistaninternational.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.