Channel
@afddresden
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,323subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001487138086 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @afddresden |
| Created | 18 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/afddresden |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 1,323 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 1,320 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:20 | 1,318 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:19 | 1,318 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 18 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (18 March 2026 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,957 |
| Reactions total | 104 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
714 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 697 | 97.6% | |
| 👎 | 17 | 2.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 714reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Wahlkampfunterstützung in der Lutherstadt Eisleben💪💙 Mitglieder des AfD-KV Dresden sowie AfD-Mitglieder aus Radeberg und Heidenau unterstützten am vergangenen Wochenende im AfD-KV Mansfeld-Südharz Reiner Kretschmann, den Direktkandidaten im WK 30 für die Landtagswahl in Sachsen-Anhalt am 6. September. In der Lutherstadt Eisleben und in den dazugehörigen Ortsteilen verteilten wir mehrere Tausend Flyer des Kandidaten…
👍48
Heute hat das Landgericht Dresden sein Urteil gegen die beiden syrischen Täter Majd A. (22) und Ismail A. (21) gesprochen. Der Amerikaner John Rudat wollte im August 2025 in einer Dresdner Straßenbahn nur zwei Frauen vor Schlägen schützen – und wurde dafür fast getötet: Mit einem Cuttermesser wurde ihm beinahe die Nase abgetrennt, 30 Stiche, lebenslange Narben. Beide Täter waren der Polizei schon vorher bekannt (Die…
👍50👎6
Sie kämpften für ihre Freiheit - gegen Willkür, Bevormundung, Verbote, Enteignung und Misswirtschaft Der #AfD-Kreisverband Dresden erinnert heute gemeinsam mit der AfD-Stadtratsfraktion und den sächsischen AfD-Abgeordneten im Bundestag an die Helden und gedenkt der Opfer des Aufstandes gegen die SED-Diktatur am 17. Juni 1953. In Zeiten, in denen die Altparteien unter dem Deckmantel der Demokratie unsere Freiheit ei…
👍61👎1
🚨 Keine Windräder auf Dresdner Stadtgebiet! Seit dem 07. Mai 2026 liegen die Planungsunterlagen zu den Windkraft-Vorranggebieten in Dresden der Öffentlichkeit aus. So sollen zukünftig Windkraftanlagen in der Dresdner Heide, in Rossendorf und dem Triebenberg entstehen können. Nutzt euer Recht und sendet eure Stellungnahme noch bis zum 06. Juli 2026 an den Regionalen Planungsverband Oberes Elbtal/Osterzgebirge. Damit…
👍50👎4
Angst vor der Demokratie? Realsatire vom Feinsten lieferte gestern das BSZ Bau und Technik Dresden.😉 Fristgerecht wurde für den 11. Mai ein Infostand der AfD Dresden bzw. deren Jugendorganisation „GD Dresden“ beantragt und genehmigt. Die „GD Sachsen" bewarb u.a. auch diesen Infostand (siehe Bild). Die „Welt“ (https://tinyurl.com/44bhwb2b) berichtete schon vorab dazu. Gestern fand nun der Infostand in der Nähe des H…
👍65👎1
Wir haben den Neumarkt blau gefärbt💙 Was für ein Wahnsinn gestern auf dem Dresdner Neumarkt. Bei Sonnenschein und blauem Himmel haben wir gestern gemeinsam mit unseren Gästen Tino Chrupalla, Dr. Rolf Weigand und Jörg Urban den Neumarkt blau gefärbt – die Bilder sprechen für sich.💪💙 Wir danken für das große Interesse und natürlich den vielen fleißigen Helfern und Organisatoren, ohne die dieser schöne Tag nicht möglich…
👍64
Viele Grüße vom Neumarkt im Herzen von Dresden. Bei blauem Himmel, Sonnenschein und bester Unterhaltung feiern wir heute gemeinsam mit vielen gut gelaunten Menschen den 1. Mai. Viel Spaß und natürlich wie immer vielen Dank an die fleißigen Organisatoren. Zeit für Veränderungen! Zeit für die AfD! 💙🇩🇪
👍68
+++ ERINNERUNG +++ 1. MAI IN DRESDEN – WIR FÄRBEN DEN NEUMARKT BLAU! 💙💙💙 Liebe Freunde, am 1. Mai wird von 12-16 Uhr der Dresdner Neumarkt zum Treffpunkt für alle, die gemeinsam ein starkes Zeichen setzen wollen. 💙 Lasst uns zusammenkommen, den Frühling begrüßen – und den Neumarkt blau einfärb…
👍48
1. MAI IN DRESDEN – WIR FÄRBEN DEN NEUMARKT BLAU! 💙💙💙 Liebe Freunde, am 1. Mai wird von 12-16 Uhr der Dresdner Neumarkt zum Treffpunkt für alle, die gemeinsam ein starkes Zeichen setzen wollen. 💙 Lasst uns zusammenkommen, den Frühling begrüßen – und den Neumarkt blau einfärben! 🎤 Unsere Redner auf der Bühne: • Tino Chrupalla • Jörg Urban • Dr. Rolf Weigand 🎶 Die Moderation übernimmt Andre’ Wendt. Für Stimmung …
👍66👎1
Heute in Dresden: Osterfriedensmarsch 🕊️ Zahlreiche Menschen sind auf die Straße gegangen, um ein klares Zeichen für Frieden, Diplomatie und gegen eine weitere Eskalation von Konflikten zu setzen. In bewegter Zeit wurde gemeinsam daran erinnert, wie wichtig Dialog und Vernunft sind. Es wurde auch deutlich, dass Waffenlieferungen in Kriegsgebiete gestoppt werden müssen, da nicht weiter Öl ins Feuer gegossen werden d…
👍50👎2
Mit uns würden die Preise so aussehen! Während Bürger und Unternehmen unter steigenden Energie- und Spritkosten leiden, zeigen wir klar: Es geht auch anders. Bezahlbare Energie ist keine Utopie, sondern eine Frage politischer Entscheidungen. ✔️ Steuern senken ✔️ Energiepolitik neu ausrichten ✔️ Versorgung sichern statt verteuern Deutschland braucht eine Politik, die die Interessen der eigenen Bürger wieder in den …
👍73👎1
Die neue Ausgabe der „Aufrecht“, der Zeitung des AfD-Kreisverbands Dresden, ist ab sofort in unserer Geschäftsstelle oder an einem unserer vielen Infostände im Stadtgebiet erhältlich. Gerne aber auch als PDF auf unserer Webseite zum Herunterladen. 👉https://afdsachsen.de/wp-content/uploads/aufrecht_dresden_maerz2026_.pdf Viel Spaß! #AfD💙
👍54👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @afddresden. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 569,942 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AfD Dresden” (@afddresden), 1,323 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/afddresden.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.