Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Aviation English for Radiotelephony ©

Channel

Aviation English for Radiotelephony ©

@aeroenglish1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,468subscribers

+94 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001359315870
TypeChannel
Username@aeroenglish1
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/aeroenglish1

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,3743,4753,424.57 August 2026 — 3,374 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,374 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,376 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,392 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,407 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,426 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,432 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,433 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,475 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,439 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,435 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,450 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,460 subscribers14 September 2026 — 3,464 subscribers18 September 2026 — 3,468 subscribers3,4687 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net +94. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,359–3,490 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 10:573,468+4
14 Sept 2026, 08:013,464+4
11 Sept 2026, 02:383,460+10
6 Sept 2026, 05:553,450+15
2 Sept 2026, 10:043,435-4
30 Aug 2026, 19:553,439-36
27 Aug 2026, 14:553,475+42
24 Aug 2026, 22:473,433+1
21 Aug 2026, 01:253,432+6
18 Aug 2026, 02:223,426+19
14 Aug 2026, 17:073,407+15
11 Aug 2026, 16:183,392+16
8 Aug 2026, 16:113,376+2
7 Aug 2026, 20:163,374no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:053,374first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 12 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Apr 2026, 14:15 UTC≈1,950 viewsread 7 August 2026

As for me, I think the internationally recognized emergency frequency is not a TikTok. The availability of this frequency ensures that any aircraft in distress can get the assistance it needs at any time of the day or night, and these two idiots can prevent it.

18 Apr 2026, 14:12 UTC≈1,860 viewsread 7 August 2026

Have you seen this viral video? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ilhM9ZUcCI

28 Mar 2026, 13:33 UTC≈1,730 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

“Examine a system or procedure.” - (Not to be used in any other context. No answer is normally expected.)

  1. Verify25%
  2. Control12%
  3. Check63%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Mar 2026, 13:32 UTC≈1,350 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

“I request verification of: (clearance, instruction, action, information).”

  1. Verify28%
  2. Confirm65%
  3. Say again7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Mar 2026, 13:31 UTC≈1,180 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

“A change has been made to your last clearance and this new clearance supersedes your previous clearance or part thereof.”

  1. Copy a new clearance31%
  2. Recleared69%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Mar 2026, 13:30 UTC≈1,000 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

“Continue in accordance with the condition(s) specified” or in its literal sense, e.g. “Maintain VFR”.

  1. Continue27%
  2. Maintain55%
  3. Follow18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Mar 2026, 13:29 UTC863 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

“Listen out on (frequency).”

  1. Monitor74%
  2. Remain this frequency26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Mar 2026, 13:28 UTC764 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

“I hereby indicate the separation between messages transmitted to different aircraft in a very busy environment.”

  1. Stand by16%
  2. Break break84%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Mar 2026, 13:26 UTC723 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

“I repeat for clarity or emphasis.”

  1. I say again79%
  2. I repeat21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Mar 2026, 13:25 UTC694 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

“Pass me the following information...”

  1. say9%
  2. request31%
  3. report60%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aeroenglish1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 16 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Mar 2026, 13:33 UTCAnonymous Quiz140 voters

“Examine a system or procedure.” - (Not to be used in any other context. No answer is normally expected.)

  1. Verify25%
  2. Control12%
  3. Check63%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Mar 2026, 13:32 UTCAnonymous Quiz152 voters

“I request verification of: (clearance, instruction, action, information).”

  1. Verify28%
  2. Confirm65%
  3. Say again7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Mar 2026, 13:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz126 voters

“A change has been made to your last clearance and this new clearance supersedes your previous clearance or part thereof.”

  1. Copy a new clearance31%
  2. Recleared69%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Mar 2026, 13:30 UTCAnonymous Quiz120 voters

“Continue in accordance with the condition(s) specified” or in its literal sense, e.g. “Maintain VFR”.

  1. Continue27%
  2. Maintain55%
  3. Follow18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Mar 2026, 13:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz128 voters

“Listen out on (frequency).”

  1. Monitor74%
  2. Remain this frequency26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Mar 2026, 13:28 UTCAnonymous Quiz112 voters

“I hereby indicate the separation between messages transmitted to different aircraft in a very busy environment.”

  1. Stand by16%
  2. Break break84%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 12 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Марк Ситдиков 🇷🇺
@MarkSitdikov · 25,314
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Aviation English for Radiotelephony ©” (@aeroenglish1), 3,468 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aeroenglish1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.