Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

aellwtix закрыто

@aellwtix

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

35subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002832837755
TypeChannel
Username@aellwtix
DescriptionПокеда
Created16 September 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/aellwtix

Growth

358 August 2026 — 35 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35 subscribers8 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34–36 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 23:0135no change
8 Aug 2026, 18:4635first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 16 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Videos
8
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 10s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

401 reactions across 13 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11428.4%
🐳6215.5%
🔥307.48%
👍297.23%
custom 5910981034979105632215.24%
custom 5978840642082578896174.24%
🍓163.99%
custom 5420441751972227194143.49%
custom 5426982862610005564133.24%
custom 5897475274093631996122.99%
custom 5978641999845138333122.99%
custom 5402498078689231798112.74%
custom 5791930657567411536102.49%
custom 603709765149996255592.24%
custom 603499183332970071382.00%
custom 547233122326519197361.50%
custom 579845941158425748151.25%
custom 533043687687876236430.748%
custom 547188999697990781730.748%
custom 526043048620696875520.499%
3 further kinds40.998%

Custom emoji. 15 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 401reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2025 to 4 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 13 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aellwtix. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 September 2025 to 4 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Mar 2026, 17:10 UTC82 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

http://tiktok.com/@aellwtix ес кому-то надо

5custom 60349918333297007131

3 Mar 2026, 17:10 UTC84 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Друзья можете отписаться я больше не буду тут активничать

custom 60349918333297007137

22 Jan 2026, 18:25 UTC404 views27 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

Хбд #edit для подружани извиняй в эдите нет чикенбургеров

custom 597884064208257889697custom 60370976514999625556custom 54024980786892317983custom 59786419998451383332

9 Jan 2026, 21:31 UTC≈1,980 views35 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Video

Trade w @kik0u1n #edit

15custom 597864199984513833310custom 59788406420825788967🐳1custom 54024980786892317981custom 60370976514999625551

31 Dec 2025, 21:19 UTC209 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Привет ты классная скажи три цифры на обороте карты @kik0u1n

custom 540249807868923179874custom 60370976514999625551

25 Dec 2025, 20:33 UTC247 views50 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Я болею свэгом #edit

custom 591098103497910563221custom 589747527409363199612custom 542044175197222719495custom 53304368768787623643

10 Dec 2025, 17:32 UTC359 views35 reactions5 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

Practice #edit исходник клипа wanderizm ют

custom 542698286261000556413custom 54723312232651919736custom 54204417519722271945custom 547188999697990781732🐳2custom 52604304862069687552custom 53754986429562533551

29 Nov 2025, 20:25 UTC927 views49 reactions2 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

Мизуки парт @kik0u1n #edit

19custom 579193065756741153610🔥9custom 57984594115842574815🐳3👍2🍾1

22 Nov 2025, 20:57 UTC298 views41 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

#edit

17🐳10👍8🔥5🍾1

Signed Andrew

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @aellwtix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 671,993 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“aellwtix закрыто” (@aellwtix), 35 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aellwtix.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.