Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for الرخصة المهنية ( التربوي ) | منصور شراحيلي

Channel

الرخصة المهنية ( التربوي ) | منصور شراحيلي

@aeel_22

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,317subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002031573699
TypeChannel
Username@aeel_22
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 September 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/aeel_22

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,3082,3212,314.510 September 2026 — 2,308 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,308 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,309 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,314 subscribers19 September 2026 — 2,315 subscribers29 September 2026 — 2,321 subscribers6 October 2026 — 2,317 subscribers2,31710 September 20266 October 2026
7 measurements spanning 26 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,306–2,323 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Oct 2026, 10:402,317-4
29 Sept 2026, 08:202,321+6
19 Sept 2026, 16:212,315+1
15 Sept 2026, 12:182,314+5
12 Sept 2026, 06:002,309+1
10 Sept 2026, 13:222,308no change
10 Sept 2026, 12:472,308first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Sept 2026, 21:01 UTC147 views1 reactionsread 10 September 2026

‏⁧ #الرخصة_المهنية⁩ ‏وضح المعلم فهد لزملائه أن هناك مؤشرات عليهم ملاحظتها عند اختيار طريقة التدريس الفردية أهمها ‏أ) عدم وجود فروق فردية بين المتعلمين ‏ب) وجود عدد قليل من المتعلمين داخل الفصل ✅ ‏ج) توفر دافعية عالية لدى الطلاب للتعلم الذاتي ‏د) تجانس المتعلمين من حيث ارتفاع المستوى

❤1

5 Sept 2026, 11:52 UTC101 viewsread 10 September 2026
Poll

الإجابة:

  1. مثير محايد ( الصوت ) + مثير طبيعي ( طلب المعلمة ) + استجابة شرطية ( الجلوس ) .62%
  2. مثير محايد ( طلب المعلمة ) + مثير طبيعي ( الصوت ) + استجابة شرطية ( الهدوء ) .9%
  3. مثير محايد ( الجلوس ) + مثير طبيعي ( الصوت ) + استجابة شرطية ( النظام ) .16%
  4. مثير محايد ( طلب المعلمة ) + مثير طبيعي ( الجلوس ) + استجابة شرطية ( الاستماع ) .13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Sept 2026, 11:52 UTC113 viewsread 10 September 2026
Poll

الإجابة :

  1. التمييز12%
  2. الإطفاء16%
  3. التعميم50%
  4. الاسترجاع التلقائي22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Sept 2026, 11:52 UTC138 views0 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Poll

يشعر الطالب بالقلق الشديد عند أداء اختبار العلوم ، من المنظور السلوكي شعور هذا الطالب يمثل استجابة :

  1. فطرية .18%
  2. شرطية .59%
  3. طبيعية .21%
  4. علمية .2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Sept 2026, 11:52 UTC104 viewsread 10 September 2026

السؤال : في بداية الفصل الدراسي ، لاحظت المعلمة أن طالباتها لا يلتزمون بالهدوء عند دخول الصف ، فبدأت تُشغل مقطعًا صوتيًا هادئًا وتطلب منهم الجلوس بعده ، وبعد تكرار ذلك أصبحوا يجلسون مباشرة عند سماعه . أي الخيارات التالية يوضّح التحليل الأدق للموقف وفق نظرية بافلوف ؟

5 Sept 2026, 11:52 UTC107 viewsread 10 September 2026

السؤال : بعد تعرّض الطالب خالد لموقف محرج خلال تقديم شفهي ضمن مهمة صفية ، بدأ يُظهر توترًا في مواقف صفية مشابهة لم يظهر فيها سابقًا هذا النوع من السلوك . ما المفهوم الذي يفسّر هذا السلوك وفق نظرية بافلوف؟

5 Sept 2026, 11:28 UTC109 viewsread 10 September 2026
Poll

تركز النظرية السلوكية على مجموعة من المبادئ التي تهدف إلى ضبط سلوك المتعلم من خلال أدوات واضحة و مباشرة . أيّ العبارات التالية لا تنتمي إلى هذه النظرية؟

  1. تعتمد على أهمية التعزيز الإيجابي والتعزيز السلبي لتوجيه السلوك وتقويته .9%
  2. تفسّر التعلّم باعتباره تغيّرًا في السلوك الظاهري القابل للملاحظة .18%
  3. ترى أن المتعلم يبني استجاباته من خلال التحليل الواعي للسلوك والمعززات .45%
  4. تعتمد على التكرار والتدريب في تكوين الاستجابة المطلوبة27%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC188 viewsread 10 September 2026
Poll

الإجابة:

  1. انخفاض في الدافعية .6%
  2. ضعف في الاستعداد .10%
  3. قصور في مستوى النضج .53%
  4. ضعف في ممارسة المهارة .31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC178 viewsread 10 September 2026

السؤال : خلال تنفيذ مشروع دراسي لاحظ المعلم سالم أن طلاب الصف الأول الابتدائي يتعاملون مع المهام بشكل مجزأ ، ويواجهون صعوبة في ربط الأنشطة ببعضها أو تصور الهدف النهائي من المشروع . ما السبب الأكثر احتمالا لهذه الصعوبات ؟

31 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC160 viewsread 10 September 2026
Poll

الإجابة:

  1. قصور في مستوى النضج الذي يحد من تفاعله الإجتماعي .18%
  2. انخفاض في مستوى الاستعداد العقلي لتلقّي المعلومة .2%
  3. انخفاض في الممارسة والتدريب مما أثر على تفاعل الطالب .25%
  4. غياب الدافعية الذاتيه التي تحرك السلوك نحو التعلم .55%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aeel_22. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Sept 2026, 11:52 UTCAnonymous Quiz45 voters

الإجابة:

  1. مثير محايد ( الصوت ) + مثير طبيعي ( طلب المعلمة ) + استجابة شرطية ( الجلوس ) .62%
  2. مثير محايد ( طلب المعلمة ) + مثير طبيعي ( الصوت ) + استجابة شرطية ( الهدوء ) .9%
  3. مثير محايد ( الجلوس ) + مثير طبيعي ( الصوت ) + استجابة شرطية ( النظام ) .16%
  4. مثير محايد ( طلب المعلمة ) + مثير طبيعي ( الجلوس ) + استجابة شرطية ( الاستماع ) .13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Sept 2026, 11:52 UTCAnonymous Quiz56 voters

يشعر الطالب بالقلق الشديد عند أداء اختبار العلوم ، من المنظور السلوكي شعور هذا الطالب يمثل استجابة :

  1. فطرية .18%
  2. شرطية .59%
  3. طبيعية .21%
  4. علمية .2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Sept 2026, 11:52 UTCAnonymous Quiz50 voters

الإجابة :

  1. التمييز12%
  2. الإطفاء16%
  3. التعميم50%
  4. الاسترجاع التلقائي22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Sept 2026, 11:28 UTCAnonymous Quiz44 voters

تركز النظرية السلوكية على مجموعة من المبادئ التي تهدف إلى ضبط سلوك المتعلم من خلال أدوات واضحة و مباشرة . أيّ العبارات التالية لا تنتمي إلى هذه النظرية؟

  1. تعتمد على أهمية التعزيز الإيجابي والتعزيز السلبي لتوجيه السلوك وتقويته .9%
  2. تفسّر التعلّم باعتباره تغيّرًا في السلوك الظاهري القابل للملاحظة .18%
  3. ترى أن المتعلم يبني استجاباته من خلال التحليل الواعي للسلوك والمعززات .45%
  4. تعتمد على التكرار والتدريب في تكوين الاستجابة المطلوبة27%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTCAnonymous Quiz49 voters

الإجابة:

  1. انخفاض في الدافعية .6%
  2. ضعف في الاستعداد .10%
  3. قصور في مستوى النضج .53%
  4. ضعف في ممارسة المهارة .31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTCAnonymous Quiz51 voters

الإجابة:

  1. قصور في مستوى النضج الذي يحد من تفاعله الإجتماعي .18%
  2. انخفاض في مستوى الاستعداد العقلي لتلقّي المعلومة .2%
  3. انخفاض في الممارسة والتدريب مما أثر على تفاعل الطالب .25%
  4. غياب الدافعية الذاتيه التي تحرك السلوك نحو التعلم .55%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2026 to 7 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

رياضيات 🇸🇦 | أول ثانوي
@KSAMath1 · 34,599
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 10 September 2026
قناة حسن 👁‍🗨التربوي العام👁‍🗨
@alroksahalmhaniah · 19,223
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 October 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الرخصة المهنية ( التربوي ) | منصور شراحيلي” (@aeel_22), 2,317 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aeel_22.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.