Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

нaшеcтвиe гномов 2016

@aedeus00

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,627subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002129498295
TypeChannel
Username@aedeus00
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aedeus00

Growth

2,6272,6372,6327 August 2026 — 2,637 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,637 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,627 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,626–2,639 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:382,627-10
7 Aug 2026, 16:022,637no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:572,637first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 24 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.7%
avg views ÷ 2,627 subscribers
Avg views / post
991
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held14 (24 February 202624 July 2026)
Views total1,981
Reactions total110
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

812 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 546752734958928267833441.1%
💘15519.1%
custom 522872992530066157414117.4%
🍓819.98%
💊536.53%
253.08%
custom 5303001841267647130232.83%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 812reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 14 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aedeus00. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 February 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTC631 views65 reactionsread 7 August 2026

всем привет всем хороших выходных!!!🎀скоро меня выпишут и мы снова будем вместе

custom 522872992530066157449💊13custom 54675273495892826783

9 Apr 2026, 12:03 UTC≈2,390 views29 reactions12 Starsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nile_valleyPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 546752734958928267826💊3

18 Mar 2026, 08:12 UTC≈3,100 views55 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 546752734958928267855

17 Mar 2026, 18:13 UTC≈2,780 views85 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 546752734958928267857💘23💊5

17 Mar 2026, 08:41 UTC≈2,270 views85 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💘41custom 546752734958928267827💊15custom 52287299253006615742

16 Mar 2026, 18:56 UTC≈1,930 views67 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @angelskijdvizh

нормисы никогда не смогут нас понять

🍓32💊17custom 522872992530066157412💘6

7 Mar 2026, 18:52 UTC≈2,420 views43 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @lechereblogPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 546752734958928267831custom 52287299253006615749💘3

5 Mar 2026, 07:40 UTC≈2,390 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 546752734958928267837💘7custom 52287299253006615742

2 Mar 2026, 08:33 UTC≈3,850 views66 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 546752734958928267852custom 522872992530066157414

2 Mar 2026, 05:55 UTC≈3,230 views72 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 546752734958928267843💘20custom 52287299253006615749

27 Feb 2026, 14:17 UTC≈1,720 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fsfmePhoto

prada fw26

custom 5228729925300661574129custom 54675273495892826781

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @aedeus00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“нaшеcтвиe гномов 2016” (@aedeus00), 2,627 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aedeus00.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.