Красивые, посмотрите, какие красивые. 🔥 Как бы женщина ни говорила о том, что не любит цветы и просит не дарить их, считая это лишней тратой денег, — всегда она будет их любить и ждать.
❤6❤🔥3🔥2

Channel
@adskoeplam66
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,247subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002305353105 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @adskoeplam66 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/adskoeplam66 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 2,247 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 2,252 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 2,253 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 2,253 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (25 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,059 |
| Reactions total | 296 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 01:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
296 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 106 | 35.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 104 | 35.1% | |
| 🔥 | 46 | 15.5% | |
| 🤗 | 13 | 4.39% | |
| 🦄 | 13 | 4.39% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 2.70% | |
| 😈 | 6 | 2.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 296reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Красивые, посмотрите, какие красивые. 🔥 Как бы женщина ни говорила о том, что не любит цветы и просит не дарить их, считая это лишней тратой денег, — всегда она будет их любить и ждать.
❤6❤🔥3🔥2
Из новостей, я еле ползу после тренировки, храни Бог моего святого тренера и меня развалину. Аминь. 🙃 А еще я сегодня не прочла норму на сч, но сил нет, а дел вагон. 😠
❤10❤🔥7🔥4
Доброе утро, булочки. Со всем своим темпом в жизни, я совершенно забываю про соц сети. 🫣 Сейчас с девочками читаем "Клуб анонимных Мстителей", Александры Байт. Потом обязательно будет отзыв. Стараюсь наладить сон, пошла по врачам, в зал. 🙃 Короче, куча дел. Как вы там?
❤11❤🔥9🔥5
Со Ван умел делать комплименты так, что Юнхи чувствовала себя особенной. При этом он никогда не перебарщивал, просто отмечал то, что казалось ему привлекательным. Его флирт был искусством, в котором сочетались грация, ум и естественная доброжелательность. Это было флиртовать, не привлекая из- лишнего внимания, но оставлять после себя ярего секретом кий след. #секретарьлиберетвыходной #еленадевальд
❤10❤🔥4🔥1
Эстетика книги 📚 #секретарьлиберетвыходной #еленадевальд
❤🔥8🤗5❤3🔥3
Когда-то Юнхи не представляла без Джихо свою жизнь. Полностью растворившись в нем, она перестала быть собой, живя его интересами и мечтами. Его друзья стали ее друзьями, его ее увлечениями. Пак Джихо был центром ее вселенной, как большая планета, а Юнхо - всего лишь ее спутником, вращающимся вокруг. Она настолько погрузилась в эти отношения, что потеряла себя. #секретарьлиберетвыходной #еленадевальд
❤11❤🔥5🔥1
Это 🤩🤩прочитанная мною книга. Секретарь Ли берёт выходной. Елена Девальд. Очень классная история. Читается на одном дыхании. Я не люблю смотреть дорамы, но вот читать — другое дело. История повествует нам о том, как молодая девушка строит карьеру секретаря в крупной компании. У неё за плечами неудачные отношения, затем упорный карьерный рост, и вот однажды она вынуждена взять выходной для того, чтобы сходить на с…
❤7❤🔥6🔥1
Для поддержания вселенского равновесия и космической гармонии человечество давно должно было придумать определенные законы, которые свели бы вероятность встречи с козлом бывшим к нулю. Например, можно сажать таких в ракету и запускать в космос. Или отправлять на самое дно самого дна в подводной лодке. В общем, сослать так далеко, чтобы не было слышно их жалких криков отчаяния и мольбы о прощении. #секретарьлиберетвы…
❤🔥7❤4🔥3
Доброе понедельничное🤗 Всем замечательного дня, мои прекрасные. 🫶 Сегодня будет отзыв. 🤗
❤11❤🔥7🔥1
Чтиво Адского Пламени 18+ pinned a photo
Итак, победитель выбран.🫶 Решила устроить ежемесячный актив с вашими хотелками на август. 🔥 Условия: 1⃣. Под данным постом, вы пишете по одной книге, которую хотели бы получить от меня и порядковый номер рядом с данным комментарием. Пример: Мара и Морок, Лия Арден. 1. Безмолвный крик. Саша Хеллмейстер. 2. 2⃣. Колличество комментариев от одного подписчика 5⃣, добавить хотелки с номерами можно с учётом репоста на …
❤12❤🔥8🔥5🦄5
Всем добрейшее утречко, булки. Совсем с этим интернетом и событиями в городе, забросила группу. 🫣 Сегодня будут итоги, успевайте. А завтра будет отзыв. 🙃
❤12❤🔥7🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @adskoeplam66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 689,357 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чтиво Адского Пламени 18+” (@adskoeplam66), 2,247 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adskoeplam66.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.