Channel
@adlunam_ann
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
22,623subscribers
-75 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001565791741 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @adlunam_ann |
| Description | Engage to Earn NFT-integrated Proof of Attention IDO Launchpad. Announcement channel for @adlunamchat |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/adlunam_ann |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 22,623 | -10 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 22,633 | -8 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 22,641 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 22,649 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 22,659 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 22,663 | -25 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:51 | 22,688 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:51 | 22,692 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 22,696 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 22,698 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Where do you think XRP goes from here ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Is Bitcoin a Safe Haven during Global Crises?
The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Jason Fernandes, Co-Founder of AdLunam Inc., tells CoinDesk From speculation to optimization Bitcoin is becoming an efficiency enhancer in modern portfolios.Read More: https://sl1nk.com/ag6gdnx
Which crypto event are you planning to attend in April? 👀
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Crypto Classroom 🎓✨ Market Cap = Price × Supply 🧮 Not all “cheap coins” are undervalued 💰 💡 A low price doesn’t mean high potential — always look at market cap. #CryptoClassroom #AdLunam Spread the word! https://x.com/AdLunamSocial/status/2037588601429500124 AdLunam: Website 🔗 Our Social Media Links Discord | Twitter | Instagram | Telegram Ann | Telegram Chat | LinkedIn | Medium | Facebook
Your market mood today? 📊
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
The real drivers behind Bitcoin’s next move 👀 Jason Fernandes, Co-Founder of AdLunam Inc & Altcoin Observer, breaks down how liquidity, interest rates, and global risk are shaping $BTC in his interview on 3.0 TV 🌍 Full interview 👇 https://youtu.be/N1UCV3mjUi0 #CryptoMarket Spread the word! https://x.com/AdLunamSocial/status/2036885978955092052 AdLunam: Website 🔗 Our Social Media Links Discord | Twitter | Ins…
Pick your crypto superpower 🦸♂️⚡️
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📣 Big news: CoinDepo appoints Nadja Bester, co-founder of AdLunam Inc & Altcoin Observer, to its Advisory Board 🔥— bringing expertise in strategy, communications, and Web3 growth 📈 Full story 👉 https://altcoin.observer/coindepo-names-nadja-bester-to-advisory-board/ #Web3 #Crypto 🚀 Spread the word! https://x.com/AltcoinObserve/status/2036116108504146414 AdLunam: Website 🔗 Our Social Media Links Discord | Twitte…
Would you use stablecoins for everyday payments if widely accepted?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🪙 Bitcoin’s recent strength comes despite ongoing downside warnings. 📉 In a forklog report, Jason Fernandes, Co-founder of AdLunam Inc, said BTC could fall to $28K only under extreme financial stress, not a typical slowdown. 🔗 Full article: https://forklog.com/en/bitcoin-tests-71000-defying-analysts-expectations/ #Crypto Spread the word! https://x.com/AdLunamSocial/status/2034646863240949908 AdLunam: Website 🔗…
Where do you get crypto news? 📰
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @adlunam_ann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Where do you think XRP goes from here ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Is Bitcoin a Safe Haven during Global Crises?
The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Which crypto event are you planning to attend in April? 👀
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Your market mood today? 📊
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Pick your crypto superpower 🦸♂️⚡️
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Would you use stablecoins for everyday payments if widely accepted?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 13 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 995,630 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AdLunam Official Announcements” (@adlunam_ann), 22,623 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adlunam_ann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.