6 measurements spanning 5 days, net -53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,778–39,849 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 10:34
39,786
-18
11 Aug 2026, 11:42
39,804
-30
10 Aug 2026, 08:20
39,834
-4
9 Aug 2026, 09:51
39,838
-3
8 Aug 2026, 08:24
39,841
+2
7 Aug 2026, 10:15
39,839
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.4%
avg views ÷ 39,786 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,500
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
13 (31 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
188,120
Reactions total
9,195
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,970
Videos
≈1,270
Links
≈378
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6m 30s
Average length
1m 38s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,195 reactions across 13 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5424641826260812939
1,735
18.9%
custom 5228762863404867026
1,627
17.7%
🔥
962
10.5%
custom 5192722783506821696
924
10.0%
😱
650
7.07%
custom 5246918085302055728
489
5.32%
custom 5368424269179007919
437
4.75%
👏
365
3.97%
custom 5289641323291224820
334
3.63%
custom 5413671951505851911
308
3.35%
custom 5438106900921090663
151
1.64%
custom 5303411271910052556
139
1.51%
custom 5346098101461459785
117
1.27%
😁
109
1.19%
🙈
102
1.11%
custom 5436095146829578708
85
0.924%
custom 5328310945376642642
75
0.816%
🙏
57
0.62%
custom 5393199225385273538
53
0.576%
custom 5289601633498465475
52
0.566%
25 further kinds
424
4.61%
Custom emoji. 14 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,195reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
25
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 13 we hold a reading for · 85%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @adeltheone. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Так, девочки 😊 у меня тут есть две темы для действительно полезных beauty публикаций: задача выбрать ту, которая наиболее интересна лично вам 🤩
🤩 - волосы (рост/густота)
📎 - ресницы (тушь/пучки)
❤️ - обе темки
P.S. Голосуйте, пожалуйста, за мой канал вот тут 🙏
Сказать «люблю» - это ничего не сказать. Обоих. Сильно. Тотально ❤️ Удивительно, но связь между Ульяной и Дэниелом тоже безумно крепкая. Они обожают друг друга 🌺 В общем, мы счастливы в коммуникации, а значит, очень богаты 😅
А вы заметили, что чем хуже в стране относятся к женщинам, тем беднее эта страна?🙆♂️
P.S. Поэтому если встретишь нищего/жадного мужика, с разгону посылай его на хуй.
Послушайте, что будет, если пренебречь третьим пунктом «ответственность». Если поверить в иллюзию того, что просто он «молодой, из небогатой семьи, из села», но стоит дать ему ресурсы и «Атлант расправит плечи» 😆
P.S. Кровь из ушей от аудио. Позор, просто дикий позор. Этому нет прощения.
Комфортные отношения без выноса мозга, обид и проблем - это всегда коктейль из трех ингредиентов:
1️⃣Хороший секс
2️⃣Близость общения
3️⃣Ответственность
Говоря женским языком⤵️
Если нам хорошо с мужчиной в постели, если нам приятны его прикосновения в повседневной жизни, если нас не отталкивает его запах, если с ним легко и спокойно общаться, если он не утыкается в телефон, когда мы открываем ему душу, и мы не зака…
Печально, но факт: большинство людей даже не задумывается, насколько абсурдно бездумно поклоняться патриотизму.
Ты рождаешься на огромной, прекрасной планете, полной возможностей, культур и горизонтов. А потом тебе включают общественную прошивку - и ты добровольно сжимаешь весь этот мир до размеров куска суши, обнесённого колючей проволокой. Ты сам себя загоняешь в загон и начинаешь искренне ненавидеть тех, кто роди…
Прикиньте, яхуений даже не поздравил сына с ДР 🙈 ни смсиной, ни подарком, ни деньгами, ничем. Честно, я не ожидала такого. Думала, что хоть для галочки закинет пару долларов на карту и подпишет, мол, Happy Birthday, Daniel 🎂 но нет …
Больно и страшно. Преступление, совершенное им, невозможно будет обнулить никогда.
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @adeltheone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Настя Созоник @NASTYASOZONIKK · 184,154 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 August 2026
Sofia Stuzhuk @sofia_stuzhuk_official · 308,202 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Адель Оземпиковна” (@adeltheone), 39,786 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adeltheone.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.